Share on
HP Pavilion 25xw vs LG 24MP48HQ-P

HP Pavilion 25xw vs LG 24MP48HQ-P

HP Pavilion 25xw
LG 24MP48HQ-P

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 13 hours ago
B&H Photo
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
Checked 4 hours ago
In stock
Newegg US
Checked 11 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP Pavilion 25xw is a 25" PC monitor. That's 1.2" bigger than the LG 24MP48HQ-P (23.8"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

One more HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the HP Pavilion 25xw is two, but the LG 24MP48HQ-P only has one HDMI port.
4 Reasons For
A lot faster response time Edit
The LG 24MP48HQ-P has a response time of 5ms, but the HP Pavilion 25xw is a 7ms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Cheaper by $110
The LG 24MP48HQ-P costs $110 less than the HP Pavilion 25xw.
24% cheaper to run
Over five years the LG 24MP48HQ-P is $14.08 cheaper to run than the HP Pavilion 25xw. Read more
Vastly better user reviews
The average user review score of the LG 24MP48HQ-P is 100% based on 1 review, however the average rating of the HP Pavilion 25xw is 60% (based on 1 review).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
2ms slower response time Edit
The HP Pavilion 25xw has a response time of 7ms, whereas the LG 24MP48HQ-P is a 5ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

More expensive by $110
The HP Pavilion 25xw is $110 more expensive than the LG 24MP48HQ-P.
Older by six months
The HP Pavilion 25xw is six months older than the LG 24MP48HQ-P.
$14.08 more expensive to run over five years
The HP Pavilion 25xw costs $58.32 to run which is $14.08 more to run than the LG 24MP48HQ-P over five years. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is hugely Worse
The HP Pavilion 25xw only has an average user score of 60%, but the LG 24MP48HQ-P has an average user rating of 100% (based on 1 review).
2 Reasons Against
6% smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 24MP48HQ-P is a 23.8" PC monitor. That's 1.2" smaller than the HP Pavilion 25xw (23.8"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

One less HDMI port Edit
The LG 24MP48HQ-P has one HDMI port, however the HP Pavilion 25xw only has two HDMI ports.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

22 months Ago 16 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 56.31
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 58.32
Purchase price $ 229.99
Total cost of ownership $ 288.31
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 44.24
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 44.24
Purchase price $ 119.99
Total cost of ownership $ 164.23
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.37T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.37 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.28T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.28 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
25"
BEST
23.8"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
308.64mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
552.96mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.288 x 0.286 0.2745 x 0.2745
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
7ms 5ms
BEST
Color Gamut
72% 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
88.1ppi Unknown - Click to provide data
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

HDMI Port
2
BEST
1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture Support
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture-in-Picture support
Tilt Angle
-2 - 25 Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug & Play
 Plug & Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Power Consumption (typical)
28W 22W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (max)
30W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
20 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
20 - 70 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
Unknown - Click to provide data
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.1kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 399mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 114.3mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 620mm
Weight With Stand
4.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
424.9mm 188mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
164.1mm
BEST
409mm
Width (with Stand)
576.5mm 548.64mm
BEST
Weight
3.8kg 2.8kg
BEST
Height
434.9mm 63.5mm
Depth
50.6mm 330mm
Width
576.5mm 548.64mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback