Share on
Acer XB270H vs Acer XB271HU

Acer XB270H vs Acer XB271HU

(272)
Acer XB270H
Acer XB271HU

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 24 hours ago
No prices found

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Acer XB270H is a 1ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the Acer XB271HU (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Cheaper to run by $6.23
The Acer XB270H only costs $76.22 to run over five years however the Acer XB271HU costs $82.45 to run (8% more). Read more
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Acer XB270H is "B", whereas the rating of the Acer XB271HU is "B".
Seventeen more awards
The Acer XB270H has 18 awards, but the Acer XB271HU has 1 award.
User reviews are a little better
The Acer XB270H has an average user review score of 82%, whereas the Acer XB271HU has an average rating of 80% (based on 1 review).
2 Reasons For
Better selling
The Acer XB271HU ranks No. 1153 by number of sales, but the Acer XB270H ranks No. 7039.
Energy efficiency rating is higher
The Acer XB271HU has an energy efficiency rating of "B", but the Acer XB270H has a rating of "B".

Reasons Against

2 Reasons Against
Over two years older
The Acer XB270H is older than the Acer XB271HU by two years.
Worse selling
The Acer XB270H ranks No. 7039 by sales volume, whereas the Acer XB271HU ranks No. 1153.
5 Reasons Against
3ms slower response time Edit
The Acer XB271HU has a response time of 4ms, whereas the Acer XB270H is a 1ms response time PC monitor (3ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
$6.23 more expensive to run over five years
The Acer XB271HU costs $82.45 to run which is $6.23 more to run than the Acer XB270H over five years. Show assumptions.
Seventeen less awards
The Acer XB271HU has only received 1 award, however the Acer XB270H has received 18 awards.
User review Rating is moderately Worse
The Acer XB271HU has an average user score of 80%, but the Acer XB270H has an average user rating of 82% (based on 236 reviews).

Awards

18 Awards
3dnews.ru: Innovative Design
benchmark.pl: Great Product
chip.com.my: Outstanding
Digital Versus: 5 Star
Expert Reviews: Recommended
gamestar.de: Platinum
hardware.info: Gold Award
hardwarecanucks.com: Dam Innovative
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
pclab.pl: Power Award
pcper.com: Editor's Choice
prohardver.hu: Recommended
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Recommended
tomshardware.com: Editor Recommended
tomshw.it: Editor Recommended
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
uk.hardware.info: Gold
XSreviews.co.uk: Editor's Choice
1 Award
XSreviews.co.uk: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

36 months Ago 10 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 74.41
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.81
Total running cost $ 76.22
Purchase price $ 60.00
Total cost of ownership $ 136.22
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 82.45
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 82.45

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.48T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.48 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.52T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.52 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 2560 x 1400
 1920 x 1080
 2560 x 1400
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 2560 x 1440
BEST
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Viewing Angle, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.6cm 68.6cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
1ms
BEST
4ms
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
82ppi Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
1 1
HDMI Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
USB Upstream Port Type
 USB Type-B
 USB Type-B

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
4W 4W
Loudspeaker
2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 Black
 Black/Red
 Black
 Black/Red
Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
30,000h Unknown - Click to provide data
NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
NVIDIA 3D Vision
Unknown - Click to provide data 1

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
150mm 150mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 35 -5 - 35
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
Power Consumption (off)
0.45W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
37W
BEST
41W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.45W Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption
55kWh
BEST
60kWh
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 MPR II
 TCO
 RoHS
 MPR II
 TCO
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
10.6kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Height
515mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
199mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
706mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
7.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
558mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (with Stand)
245mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width (with Stand)
640mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
5.4kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height
381mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth
62mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width
639.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 HDMI

Other Features

Quantity Per Pallet
40 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback