Share on
HP ProDisplay P17A vs Neovo SC-17

HP ProDisplay P17A vs Neovo SC-17

HP ProDisplay P17A
Neovo SC-17

Top Prices

Overstock
Checked 2 days ago
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
RAM Computers and Games
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
PC Rush
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
bzbexpress
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
Cheaper by $105
The HP ProDisplay P17A costs $74.13, whereas the Neovo SC-17 is $179.30.
6 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
$5.63 cheaper to run
Over five years the HP ProDisplay P17A is $5.63 cheaper to run than the Neovo SC-17. Read more
2 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Neovo SC-17 is a 3ms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the HP ProDisplay P17A (3ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Neovo SC-17 has a built-in speaker(s), however the HP ProDisplay P17A does not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Reasons Against

2 Reasons Against
A lot slower response time Edit
The HP ProDisplay P17A has a response time of 5ms, whereas the Neovo SC-17 is a 3ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The HP ProDisplay P17A does not have a built-in speaker(s), whereas the Neovo SC-17 has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

4 Reasons Against
$105 more expensive
The Neovo SC-17 is more expensive than the HP ProDisplay P17A by $105.17.
Less retailers
Only 3 shops sells the Neovo SC-17, whereas 9 retailers sell the HP ProDisplay P17A. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Over one year older
The Neovo SC-17 is older than the HP ProDisplay P17A by 14 months.
18% higher running costs over five years
The running costs over five years of the Neovo SC-17 are $36.20 which is $5.63 more than the HP ProDisplay P17A. Show assumptions.

Date Released

21 months Ago 36 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 30.57
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 30.57
Purchase price $ 74.13
Total cost of ownership $ 104.70
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 36.20
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 36.20
Purchase price $ 179.30
Total cost of ownership $ 215.50
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.19T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.19 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.23T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.23 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
17" 17"
Display Resolution
 1280 x 1024
 1280 x 1024
Display
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
BEST
HD Type
 Not supported
 Not supported
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
270.3mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
337.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 5:4
 5:4
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
24 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.264 x 0.264 0.264 x 0.264
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 160°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 170°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
43.2cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 3ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 5:4
 4:3
BEST
 5:4
 4:3
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

BNC Input Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (typical)
15.2W
BEST
18W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 32kWh
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 RoHS
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 3.7kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 467mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 138mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 450mm
Weight With Stand
3.7kg 2.9kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
387.2mm 385.2mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
206.3mm 184mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
377.2mm 372mm
BEST
Weight
3.2kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height
316.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth
57mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width
377.2mm 372mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 VGA
 AC
 VGA
 AC
BEST
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Feedback