HP ProDisplay P232 vs Lenovo X24

HP ProDisplay P232

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 2 days ago
Overstock
Checked 1 day ago
B&H Photo
Checked 1 day ago
In stock
Best Buy
Checked 11 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Adorama
Checked 23 hours ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
40% faster response time Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the Lenovo X24 (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

VESA mounting Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 supports VESA mounting, but the Lenovo X24 does not support VESA mounting.
8% lighter Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a 3.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 270g lighter than the Lenovo X24 (3.9kg).
$125 cheaper
The HP ProDisplay P232 is $125 cheaper than the Lenovo X24.
Available from 3 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Cheaper to run by $16.33
The HP ProDisplay P232 only costs $30.84 to run over five years however the Lenovo X24 costs $47.17 to run (53% more). Read more
8 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 23.8" PC monitor. That's 0.8" bigger than the HP ProDisplay P232 (23.8"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Marginally bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 296.5mm viewable height PC monitor, whereas the HP ProDisplay P232 is only a 286.4mm viewable height PC monitor (10.1mm smaller).
Bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
Lenovo X24 is 527mm viewable width. That's 17.8mm bigger than the HP ProDisplay P232 (527mm).
18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the HP ProDisplay P232 is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the HP ProDisplay P232 (178°).
4% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 60.45cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 2.03cm bigger than the HP ProDisplay P232 (60.45cm).
Two displayPorts quantitys Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a two displayPorts quantity PC monitor, whereas the HP ProDisplay P232 only has one displayPorts quantity.
3W lower power consumption (max) Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 27W maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 3W lower than the HP ProDisplay P232 (27W).

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
0.8" smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 has a display diagonal of 23", whereas the Lenovo X24 is a 23.8" PC monitor (0.8" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a 286.4mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 10.1mm smaller than the Lenovo X24 (296.5mm).
17.8mm smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
HP ProDisplay P232 is only 509.2mm viewable width, but the Lenovo X24 is a 527mm viewable width PC monitor (17.8mm bigger).
18° narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the Lenovo X24 (178°).
8° narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the Lenovo X24 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
Slightly smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a 58.42cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the Lenovo X24 is a 60.45cm display diagonal PC monitor (2.03cm bigger).
One less displayPorts quantity Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a one displayPorts quantity PC monitor, whereas the Lenovo X24 only has two displayPorts quantitys.
A bit higher power consumption (max) Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a 30W maximum power consumption PC monitor, whereas the Lenovo X24 is a 27W maximum power consumption PC monitor (3W lower).
7 Reasons Against
2ms slower response time Edit
The Lenovo X24 has a response time of 7ms, however the HP ProDisplay P232 is a 5ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not support VESA mounting Edit
The Lenovo X24 does not support VESA mounting, whereas the HP ProDisplay P232 supports VESA mounting.
270g heavier Edit
The Lenovo X24 has a weight of 3.9kg, whereas the HP ProDisplay P232 is a 3.6kg weight PC monitor (270g lighter).
More expensive by $125
The Lenovo X24 is $125 more expensive than the HP ProDisplay P232.
Fewer sellers
The Lenovo X24 is only stocked by 2 retailers, but the HP ProDisplay P232 is stocked by 5 sellers. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Older by one month
The Lenovo X24 is one month older than the HP ProDisplay P232.
$16.33 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs over five years of the Lenovo X24 are $47.17 which is $16.33 more than the HP ProDisplay P232. Show assumptions.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

21 months Ago 22 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 28.58
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 30.84
Purchase price $ 99.99
Total cost of ownership $ 130.83
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 45.28
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.89
Total running cost $ 47.17
Purchase price $ 224.99
Total cost of ownership $ 272.16
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.32T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.32 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
23" 23.8"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 5000000:1
BEST
 5000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1366 х 768
 720 x 400
 640 x 350
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1366 х 768
 720 x 400
 640 x 350
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Response Time (3D)
Unknown - Click to provide data 7
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 604.5mm
Viewable Size, Vertical
286.4mm 296.5mm
BEST
Viewable Size, Horizontal
509.2mm 527mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
24 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.265 x 0.265 0.2745 x 0.2745
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
58.42cm 60.45cm
BEST
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
7ms
Color Gamut
72% 72%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
96 Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
1 2
BEST
HDMI Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating Systems Supported
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise
NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data
 NVIDIA G-SYNC

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 22 -5 - 22
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
 Power LED
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
Number of OSD Languages
10 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (typical)
24W 24W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption (max)
30W 27W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
20 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
20 - 70 8 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
5 - 35 0 - 45

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Height
422mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
140mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
632mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width (side)
Unknown - Click to provide data 3,900mm
Weight With Stand
5.7kg 540.9g
BEST
Height (with Stand)
408.3mm
BEST
412.8mm
Depth (with Stand)
185mm
BEST
220mm
Width (with Stand)
548.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
3.6kg
BEST
3.9kg
Height
346.3mm 540.9mm
Depth
55mm 220mm
Width
548.6mm 412.8mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
Manual
 Manual
 Manual
Feedback