Asus VG248QE vs DELL U2415 vs DELL UltraSharp 24 vs HP Pavilion 22xw

(357)
(169)
(169)
(23)
Asus VG248QE
DELL U2415
DELL UltraSharp 24
HP Pavilion 22xw

Top Prices

Best Buy
Checked 17 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Factory Outlet Store
Checked 1 day ago
In stock
B&H Photo
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found
Amazon US
Checked 2 hours ago
Out of stock
Adorama
Checked 16 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
PC Rush
Checked 19 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Newegg US
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
A lot brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a display brightness of 350 cd/m², whereas the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both only 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² dimmer) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² dimmer).
7ms faster response time Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 1ms response time PC monitor. That's 5ms faster than the DELL U2415 (7ms), 7ms faster than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (7ms) and 6ms faster than the HP Pavilion 22xw (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a built-in speaker(s), whereas the DELL U2415 and the HP Pavilion 22xw do not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Available from 5 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
More popular
The Asus VG248QE is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 92 by sales volume in our PC monitors, whereas the HP Pavilion 22xw ranks No. 1388.
Twelve more awards
The Asus VG248QE has 13 awards, but the DELL U2415 has 1 award and the DELL UltraSharp 24 has 1 award.
User reviews are a bit better
Based on 319 user reviews, the Asus VG248QE has an average review score of 94%, whereas the DELL U2415 has an average rating of 91% (based on 166 reviews), the DELL UltraSharp 24 has an average rating of 91% (based on 166 reviews) and the HP Pavilion 22xw has an average rating of 85% (based on 23 reviews).
10 Reasons For
2.6" bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 24.1" PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 0.1" bigger than the Asus VG248QE (21.5") and 2.6" bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (21.5"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (as do the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw), whereas the Asus VG248QE is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw. That's 8° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°).
6.5cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 61.1cm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 6.5cm bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (54.6cm).
19% larger color gamut Edit
The DELL U2415 has a color gamut of 91%, whereas the HP Pavilion 22xw is only a 72% color gamut PC monitor (19% smaller).
Two displayPorts quantitys Edit
The DELL U2415 is a two displayPorts quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has one displayPorts quantity. Read more

We do not know the number of displayPorts quantitys on the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that it does not have any displayPorts quantitys.

One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The DELL U2415 is a two HDMI ports quantity PC monitor (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), whereas the HP Pavilion 22xw only has one HDMI ports quantity.
One more USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the DELL U2415 is six, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Asus VG248QE or the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

Cheaper to run by $23.94
Over five years the DELL U2415 is $23.94 cheaper to run than the Asus VG248QE. Read more
Better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the DELL U2415 is 87% based on 3 reviews, whereas the average rating of the Asus VG248QE is 78% (based on 38 reviews).
9 Reasons For
11% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 24.1" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 0.1" bigger than the Asus VG248QE (21.5") and 2.6" bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (21.5"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18% bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a viewable size, vertical of 324mm, however the HP Pavilion 22xw is only a 267.79mm viewable height PC monitor (56.21mm smaller).
Bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 518.4mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 42.34mm bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (476.06mm).
11% wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a viewing angle, vertical of 178° (as do the DELL U2415 and the HP Pavilion 22xw), however the Asus VG248QE is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178°, and so do the DELL U2415 and the HP Pavilion 22xw. That's 8° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°).
11% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a display diagonal (metric) of 61.1cm, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 6.5cm bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (54.6cm).
One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has two HDMI ports quantitys (as does the DELL U2415), however the HP Pavilion 22xw only has one HDMI ports quantity.
45% cheaper to run
Over five years the DELL UltraSharp 24 only costs $29.65 to run but the Asus VG248QE costs $53.59 to run (81% more). Read more
Better expert reviews
Based on 3 reviews, the average expert review score of the DELL UltraSharp 24 is 87%, however the average rating of the Asus VG248QE is 78% (based on 38 reviews).
7 Reasons For
Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
HP Pavilion 22xw is 178° vertical viewing angle, and so do the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 18° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°).
8° wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
HP Pavilion 22xw is 178° horizontal viewing angle (as do the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24), but the Asus VG248QE is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Significantly lower power consumption (off) Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw is a 0.23W power consumption when off PC monitor, whereas the Asus VG248QE is a 0.5W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.27W higher).
Three times lower power consumption (max) Edit
HP Pavilion 22xw is 24W maximum power consumption, but the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 75W maximum power consumption PC monitors (51W higher).
96% lighter Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw is a 2.8kg weight PC monitor. That's 2.7kg lighter than the Asus VG248QE (2.8kg) and 1.4kg lighter than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (2.8kg).
$94 cheaper
The HP Pavilion 22xw costs $124.99, whereas the Asus VG248QE is $269.00 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 is $219.00.
$23.94 cheaper to run
The HP Pavilion 22xw only costs $29.65 to run over five years whereas the Asus VG248QE costs $53.59 to run (81% more). Read more

Reasons Against

11 Reasons Against
A bit smaller display diagonal Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a display diagonal of 24", whereas the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 24.1" PC monitors (0.1" bigger) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 21.5" PC monitor (2.5" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18° narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the DELL U2415, the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw (178°).
Moderately narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2415, the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw are all 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
One less displayPorts quantity Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a one displayPorts quantity PC monitor (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), whereas the DELL U2415 only has two displayPorts quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of displayPorts quantitys on the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that it does not have any displayPorts quantitys.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, and so does the HP Pavilion 22xw, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Vastly higher power consumption (off) Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a power consumption (off) of 0.5W, however the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 0.23W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.27W lower).
Heavier Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.3kg heavier than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (2.8kg) and 2.7kg heavier than the HP Pavilion 22xw (2.8kg).
$144 more expensive
The Asus VG248QE is more expensive than the DELL UltraSharp 24 by $50 and more expensive than the HP Pavilion 22xw by $144.01.
One year older
The Asus VG248QE is older than the DELL U2415 by three months, older than the DELL UltraSharp 24 by three months and older than the HP Pavilion 22xw by one year.
81% higher running costs over five years
The running costs over five years of the Asus VG248QE are $53.59 which is $23.94 more than the DELL U2415, $23.94 more than the DELL UltraSharp 24 and $23.94 more than the HP Pavilion 22xw. Show assumptions.
Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the Asus VG248QE is only 78%, whereas the average expert rating of the DELL U2415 is 87% (based on 3 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 24 is 87% (based on 3 reviews).
9 Reasons Against
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VG248QE (250 cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP Pavilion 22xw (250 cd/m²).
Vastly slower response time Edit
The DELL U2415 has a response time of 6ms, however the Asus VG248QE is a 1ms response time PC monitor (5ms faster), the DELL UltraSharp 24 is an 8ms response time PC monitor (2ms slower) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 7ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The DELL U2415 does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As does the the HP Pavilion 22xw), however the Asus VG248QE has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Higher power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 75W maximum power consumption PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 51W higher than the HP Pavilion 22xw (24W).
A lot heavier Edit
The DELL U2415 has a weight of 4.3kg (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), whereas the Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor (1.3kg heavier) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 2.8kg weight PC monitor (1.4kg lighter).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by nine months
The DELL U2415 is nine months older than the HP Pavilion 22xw. The DELL U2415 is the same age as the DELL UltraSharp 24.
Twelve less awards
The DELL U2415 has only received 1 award, but the Asus VG248QE has received 13 awards.
User review Rating is moderately Worse
The average user rating of the DELL U2415 is 91%, whereas the average user rating of the Asus VG248QE is 94% (based on 319 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
17% dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VG248QE (250 cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP Pavilion 22xw (250 cd/m²).
7ms slower response time Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a response time of 8ms, but the Asus VG248QE is a 1ms response time PC monitor (7ms faster), the DELL U2415 is a 6ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 7ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one displayPorts quantity Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has one displayPorts quantity, and so does the Asus VG248QE, however the DELL U2415 only has two displayPorts quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of displayPorts quantitys on the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that it does not have any displayPorts quantitys.

One less USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a five USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2415 only has six USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Asus VG248QE or the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

68% higher power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a power consumption (max) of 75W, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 51W higher than the HP Pavilion 22xw (24W).
1.4kg heavier Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a weight of 4.3kg (as does the DELL U2415), however the Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor (1.3kg heavier) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 2.8kg weight PC monitor (1.4kg lighter).
More expensive by $94
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is $94.01 more expensive than the HP Pavilion 22xw.
Less retailers
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is only stocked by 3 shops, whereas the Asus VG248QE is stocked by 6 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by nine months
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is nine months older than the HP Pavilion 22xw. The DELL UltraSharp 24 is the same age as the DELL U2415.
Twelve less awards
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has only received 1 award, whereas the Asus VG248QE has received 13 awards.
User review Rating is a little Worse
The DELL UltraSharp 24's average user score is 91%, however the Asus VG248QE's is 94% (based on 319 reviews).
12 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a display diagonal of 21.5", but the Asus VG248QE is a 24" PC monitor (2.5" bigger) and the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 24.1" PC monitors (2.6" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
HP Pavilion 22xw is only 267.79mm viewable height. That's 56.21mm smaller than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (267.79mm).
42.34mm smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a viewable size, horizontal of 476.06mm, however the DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 518.4mm viewable width PC monitor (42.34mm bigger).
Smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
HP Pavilion 22xw is only 54.6cm display diagonal, but the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 61.1cm display diagonal PC monitors (6.5cm bigger).
100 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², but the Asus VG248QE is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² brighter) and the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² brighter).
86% slower response time Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw is a 7ms response time PC monitor. That's 6ms slower than the Asus VG248QE (7ms), 1ms slower than the DELL U2415 (7ms) and 1ms faster than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Smaller color gamut Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw is a 72% color gamut PC monitor. That's 19% smaller than the DELL U2415 (72%).
Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the HP Pavilion 22xw is one, and so does the Asus VG248QE, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As does the the DELL U2415), whereas the Asus VG248QE has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Not as many stockists
Only 1 shop sell the HP Pavilion 22xw, however 6 shops sell the Asus VG248QE and 3 retailers sell the DELL UltraSharp 24. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Worse selling
The HP Pavilion 22xw ranks No. 1388 by sales volume, but the Asus VG248QE ranks No. 92.
Lower user review Score
The HP Pavilion 22xw has an average user rating of 85%, but the Asus VG248QE has an average user rating of 94% (based on 319 reviews), the DELL U2415 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 166 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 24 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 166 reviews).

Awards

13 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
hardware.info: Silver Award
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
moddingmx.com: Gold
ozeros.com: Recommended
profesionalreview.com: Gold
Techsweden.org: Value for Money
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

31 months Ago 28 months Ago 28 months Ago 19 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 53.59
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 53.59
Purchase price $ 269.00
Total cost of ownership $ 322.59
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 27.39
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 29.65
Electricity cost - switched on $ 27.39
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 29.65
Purchase price $ 219.00
Total cost of ownership $ 248.65
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 27.39
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 29.65
Purchase price $ 124.99
Total cost of ownership $ 154.64
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.36T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.36 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
24" 24.1"
BEST
24.1"
BEST
21.5"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
 W-LED
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 144 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 140 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 611mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 324mm
BEST
267.79mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm
BEST
476.06mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.2768 x 0.2768 0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27 0.248 x 0.248
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
Unknown - Click to provide data 61.1cm
BEST
61.1cm
BEST
54.6cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
6ms 8ms 7ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 91%
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 102

Ports & Interfaces

PC Audio in
 PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
 Audio output
Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPorts Quantity
1 2
BEST
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 2
BEST
2
BEST
1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 6
BEST
5 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
 Built-in speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 Unknown - Click to provide data -21 - 5 -2 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (off)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.23W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
45W 23W
BEST
23W
BEST
23W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30kWh
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 75W 75W 24W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90 5 - 90 20 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80 10 - 80 20 - 70
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40 0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.1kg
BEST
8.4kg 8.4kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Height
413mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
221mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
674mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 3.5kg
Height (with Stand)
499.9mm 517.9mm 517.9mm 384.4mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
231mm 205mm 205mm 150.8mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
569.4mm 532.2mm 532.2mm 498.5mm
BEST
Weight
5.5kg 4.3kg 4.3kg 2.8kg
BEST
Height
340.4mm 350.6mm 350.6mm 303.4mm
Depth
57.3mm 45.7mm 45.7mm 50.6mm
Width
569.4mm 532.2mm 532.2mm 498.5mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
Feedback