Share on
Asus VG248QE vs DELL U2415 vs DELL UltraSharp 24 vs HP Pavilion 22xw

Asus VG248QE vs DELL U2415 vs DELL UltraSharp 24 vs HP Pavilion 22xw

(774)
(306)
(306)
(26)
Asus VG248QE
DELL U2415
DELL UltraSharp 24
HP Pavilion 22xw

Top Prices

Best Buy
Checked 6 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
Checked 1 day ago
Standard delivery: $59.99
Amazon US
Checked 18 hours ago
Delivery unknown
No prices found
iSave Super Store
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
No prices found

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
3D Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 3D PC monitor, but the DELL U2415, the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw are not 3D. Read more

Monitors that are 3D compatible are able to display 3D images. Some monitors will require you to wear special glasses to appreciate the 3D affect.

A 3D monitor allows you to view 3D content on the monitor such as 3D films, 3D games or 3D applications.

7ms faster response time Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 1ms response time PC monitor. That's 5ms faster than the DELL U2415 (7ms), 7ms faster than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (7ms) and 6ms faster than the HP Pavilion 22xw (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a built-in speaker(s), whereas the DELL U2415, the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw do not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

$67 cheaper
The Asus VG248QE is $66.76 cheaper than the DELL UltraSharp 24.
Available from 19 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Fourteen more awards
The Asus VG248QE has 15 awards, but the DELL U2415 has 1 award and the DELL UltraSharp 24 has 1 award.
User reviews are a bit better
Based on 729 user reviews, the Asus VG248QE has an average review score of 91%, whereas the HP Pavilion 22xw has an average rating of 87% (based on 26 reviews).
6 Reasons For
2.6" bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 24.1" PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 0.1" bigger than the Asus VG248QE (21.5") and 2.6" bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (21.5"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (as do the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw), whereas the Asus VG248QE is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw. That's 8° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°).
One more HDMI port Edit
The DELL U2415 is a two HDMI port PC monitor (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), whereas the HP Pavilion 22xw only has one HDMI port.
Better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the DELL U2415 is 87% based on 3 reviews, whereas the average rating of the Asus VG248QE is 78% (based on 45 reviews).
Moderately better user reviews
The average user review score of the DELL U2415 is 91% based on 303 reviews, whereas the average rating of the HP Pavilion 22xw is 87% (based on 26 reviews).
7 Reasons For
11% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 24.1" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 0.1" bigger than the Asus VG248QE (21.5") and 2.6" bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (21.5"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

11% wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a viewing angle, vertical of 178° (as do the DELL U2415 and the HP Pavilion 22xw), however the Asus VG248QE is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178°, and so do the DELL U2415 and the HP Pavilion 22xw. That's 8° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°).
One more HDMI port Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has two HDMI ports (as does the DELL U2415), however the HP Pavilion 22xw only has one HDMI port.
Better selling
The DELL UltraSharp 24 ranks No. 50 by number of sales, however the Asus VG248QE ranks No. 109 and the HP Pavilion 22xw ranks No. 4935.
Better expert reviews
Based on 3 reviews, the average expert review score of the DELL UltraSharp 24 is 87%, however the average rating of the Asus VG248QE is 78% (based on 45 reviews).
A little better user reviews
Based on 303 reviews, the average user review score of the DELL UltraSharp 24 is 91%, however the average rating of the HP Pavilion 22xw is 87% (based on 26 reviews).
3 Reasons For
Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
HP Pavilion 22xw is 178° vertical viewing angle, and so do the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 18° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°).
8° wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
HP Pavilion 22xw is 178° horizontal viewing angle (as do the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24), but the Asus VG248QE is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
$42.34 cheaper to run
The HP Pavilion 22xw only costs $48.16 to run over five years whereas the Asus VG248QE costs $90.50 to run (88% more), the DELL U2415 costs $48.26 to run (0% more) and the DELL UltraSharp 24 costs $48.26 to run (0% more). Read more

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
A bit smaller display diagonal Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a display diagonal of 24", whereas the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 24.1" PC monitors (0.1" bigger) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 21.5" PC monitor (2.5" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18° narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the DELL U2415, the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw (178°).
Moderately narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2415, the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw are all 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
Only one HDMI port Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a one HDMI port PC monitor, and so does the HP Pavilion 22xw, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has two HDMI ports.
Over two years older
The Asus VG248QE is older than the DELL U2415 by 22 months, older than the DELL UltraSharp 24 by 22 months and older than the HP Pavilion 22xw by three years.
88% higher running costs over five years
The running costs over five years of the Asus VG248QE are $90.50 which is $42.24 more than the DELL U2415, $42.24 more than the DELL UltraSharp 24 and $42.34 more than the HP Pavilion 22xw. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Asus VG248QE ranks No. 109 by sales volume, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 ranks No. 50.
Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the Asus VG248QE is only 78%, whereas the average expert rating of the DELL U2415 is 87% (based on 3 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 24 is 87% (based on 3 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
Vastly slower response time Edit
The DELL U2415 has a response time of 6ms, however the Asus VG248QE is a 1ms response time PC monitor (5ms faster), the DELL UltraSharp 24 is an 8ms response time PC monitor (2ms slower) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 7ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The DELL U2415 does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As do the the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw), however the Asus VG248QE has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by nine months
The DELL U2415 is nine months older than the HP Pavilion 22xw. The DELL U2415 is the same age as the DELL UltraSharp 24.
Higher running costs over five years by $0.10
The DELL U2415 costs $48.26 to run which is $0.10 more to run than the HP Pavilion 22xw over five years. Show assumptions.
Fourteen less awards
The DELL U2415 has only received 1 award, but the Asus VG248QE has received 15 awards.
7 Reasons Against
7ms slower response time Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a response time of 8ms, but the Asus VG248QE is a 1ms response time PC monitor (7ms faster), the DELL U2415 is a 6ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 7ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As do the the DELL U2415 and the HP Pavilion 22xw), but the Asus VG248QE has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

More expensive by $67
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is $66.76 more expensive than the Asus VG248QE.
Less retailers
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is only stocked by 1 shop, whereas the Asus VG248QE is stocked by 20 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by nine months
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is nine months older than the HP Pavilion 22xw. The DELL UltraSharp 24 is the same age as the DELL U2415.
$0.10 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the running costs of the DELL UltraSharp 24 are $48.26 which is $0.10 more than the HP Pavilion 22xw. Show assumptions.
Fourteen less awards
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has only received 1 award, whereas the Asus VG248QE has received 15 awards.
7 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a display diagonal of 21.5", but the Asus VG248QE is a 24" PC monitor (2.5" bigger) and the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 24.1" PC monitors (2.6" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

86% slower response time Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw is a 7ms response time PC monitor. That's 6ms slower than the Asus VG248QE (7ms), 1ms slower than the DELL U2415 (7ms) and 1ms faster than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the HP Pavilion 22xw is one, and so does the Asus VG248QE, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has two HDMI ports.
Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw does not have a built-in speaker(s) (As do the the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24), whereas the Asus VG248QE has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Worse selling
The HP Pavilion 22xw ranks No. 4935 by sales volume, but the Asus VG248QE ranks No. 109 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 ranks No. 50.
Slightly Lower user review Score
The HP Pavilion 22xw has an average user rating of 87%, but the Asus VG248QE has an average user rating of 91% (based on 729 reviews), the DELL U2415 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 303 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 24 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 303 reviews).

Awards

15 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
computershopper.com: Editor's Choice
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
hardware.info: Silver Award
hardwareviews.com: Gold
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
moddingmx.com: Gold
ozeros.com: Recommended
profesionalreview.com: Gold
Techsweden.org: Value for Money
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

54 months Ago 31 months Ago 32 months Ago 22 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 90.50
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 90.50
Purchase price $ 229.99
Total cost of ownership $ 320.49
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 46.25
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 48.26
Electricity cost - switched on $ 46.25
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 48.26
Purchase price $ 296.75
Total cost of ownership $ 345.01
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 46.15
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 48.16

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.57T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.57 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
15
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.31T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.31 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.31T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.31 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.31T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.31 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
24" 24.1"
BEST
24.1"
BEST
21.5"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
BEST
 3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
 W-LED
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 144 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 140 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 611mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 324mm
BEST
324mm
BEST
267.79mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm
BEST
518.4mm
BEST
476.06mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.2768 x 0.2768 0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27 0.248 x 0.248
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
Unknown - Click to provide data 61.1cm
BEST
61.1cm
BEST
54.6cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
6ms 8ms 7ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 91%
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 102ppi
SRGB Coverage (typical)
Unknown - Click to provide data 99 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

PC Audio in
 PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
 Audio output
Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
2
BEST
1
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 6
BEST
5 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
15 - 5 Unknown - Click to provide data -21 - 5 -2 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug & Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug & Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.23W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
45W 23W
BEST
23W
BEST
23W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30kWh
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 75W 75W 24W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90 5 - 90 20 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80 10 - 80 20 - 70
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40 0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.1kg
BEST
8.4kg 8.4kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Height
413mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
221mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
674mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 3.5kg
Height (with Stand)
499.9mm 517.9mm 517.9mm 384.4mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
231mm 205mm 205mm 150.8mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
569.4mm 532.2mm 532.2mm 498.5mm
BEST
Weight
5.5kg 4.3kg 4.3kg 2.8kg
BEST
Height
340.4mm 350.6mm 350.6mm 303.4mm
Depth
57.3mm 45.7mm 45.7mm 50.6mm
Width
569.4mm 532.2mm 532.2mm 498.5mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
Feedback