DELL E2416H vs DELL SE2416H vs HP Pavilion 23xw

(4)
DELL E2416H
HP Pavilion 23xw

Top Prices

Amazon US
Checked 9 hours ago
Out of stock
Adorama
Checked 20 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Newegg US
Checked 13 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
Tech For Less
Checked 13 hours ago
In stock
Overstock
Checked 16 hours ago
Simple Cell Inc
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
Newegg US
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
Amazon US
Checked 1 day ago
Out of stock
B&H Photo
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
1" bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL E2416H has a display diagonal of 24", but the DELL SE2416H is only a 23.8" PC monitor (0.2" smaller) and the HP Pavilion 23xw is only a 23" PC monitor (1" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

40% faster response time Edit
The DELL E2416H is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the DELL SE2416H (7ms) and 2ms faster than the HP Pavilion 23xw (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

VESA mounting Edit
The DELL E2416H supports VESA mounting (as does the HP Pavilion 23xw), however the DELL SE2416H does not support VESA mounting.
Lighter Edit
The DELL E2416H is a 2.9kg weight PC monitor. That's 290g lighter than the DELL SE2416H (3.3kg) and 340g lighter than the HP Pavilion 23xw (3.3kg).
$12.43 cheaper to run
The DELL E2416H only costs $27.56 to run over five years whereas the DELL SE2416H costs $39.99 to run (45% more) and the HP Pavilion 23xw costs $32.03 to run (16% more). Read more
10 Reasons For
A little bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a viewable size, vertical of 296.46mm, however the HP Pavilion 23xw is only a 286.42mm viewable height PC monitor (10.04mm smaller).
Bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The DELL SE2416H is a 527.04mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 17.86mm bigger than the HP Pavilion 23xw (509.18mm).
11% wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a viewing angle, vertical of 178° (as does the HP Pavilion 23xw), however the DELL E2416H is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178°, and so does the HP Pavilion 23xw. That's 8° wider than the DELL E2416H (178°).
4% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a display diagonal (metric) of 60.5cm. That's 2.1cm bigger than the HP Pavilion 23xw (58.4cm).
15% larger color gamut Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a color gamut of 84%, however the HP Pavilion 23xw is only a 72% color gamut PC monitor (12% smaller).
8% lower power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a power consumption (max) of 25W. That's 2W lower than the HP Pavilion 23xw (27W).
Cheaper by $23
The DELL SE2416H costs $23 less than the DELL E2416H and costs $53 less than the HP Pavilion 23xw.
12 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Better selling
The DELL SE2416H ranks No. 138 by number of sales, however the HP Pavilion 23xw ranks No. 1250.
6 Reasons For
18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (as does the DELL SE2416H), whereas the DELL E2416H is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the DELL SE2416H. That's 8° wider than the DELL E2416H (178°).
One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a two HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL SE2416H only has one HDMI ports quantity. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL E2416H. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

VESA mounting Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw supports VESA mounting, and so does the DELL E2416H, but the DELL SE2416H does not.
37% lower power consumption (off) Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a power consumption (off) of 0.22W. That's 0.08W lower than the DELL SE2416H (0.22W).
Better user reviews
The average user review score of the HP Pavilion 23xw is 100%, whereas the average rating of the DELL E2416H is 95% (based on 4 reviews).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
DELL E2416H is only 160° vertical viewing angle. That's 18° narrower than the DELL SE2416H and the HP Pavilion 23xw (178°).
8° narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
DELL E2416H is only 170° horizontal viewing angle, but the DELL SE2416H and the HP Pavilion 23xw are both 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
$23 more expensive
The DELL E2416H is more expensive than the DELL SE2416H by $23.
Not as many stockists
Only 10 retailers sells the DELL E2416H, however 16 stores sell the DELL SE2416H. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Four months older
The DELL E2416H is older than the DELL SE2416H by four months.
Lower user review Score
The DELL E2416H has an average user rating of 95%, but the HP Pavilion 23xw has an average user rating of 100% (based on 1 review).
7 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL SE2416H is a 23.8" PC monitor. That's 0.2" smaller than the DELL E2416H (23") and 0.8" bigger than the HP Pavilion 23xw (23"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slower response time Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a response time of 6ms, but the DELL E2416H is a 5ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster) and the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 7ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI ports quantity Edit
The DELL SE2416H has one HDMI ports quantity, however the HP Pavilion 23xw only has two HDMI ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL E2416H. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

Does not support VESA mounting Edit
The DELL SE2416H does not support VESA mounting, however the DELL E2416H and the HP Pavilion 23xw support VESA mounting.
Higher power consumption (off) Edit
DELL SE2416H is 0.3W power consumption when off. That's 0.08W higher than the HP Pavilion 23xw (0.22W).
290g heavier Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a weight of 3.2kg, however the DELL E2416H is a 2.9kg weight PC monitor (290g lighter) and the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 3.3kg weight PC monitor (50g heavier).
$12.43 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs of the DELL SE2416H are $39.99 which is $12.43 more than the DELL E2416H and $7.96 more than the HP Pavilion 23xw over five years. Show assumptions.
13 Reasons Against
5% smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 23" PC monitor. That's 1" smaller than the DELL E2416H (23") and 0.8" smaller than the DELL SE2416H (23"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

10.04mm smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 286.42mm viewable height PC monitor, whereas the DELL SE2416H is a 296.46mm viewable height PC monitor (10.04mm bigger).
4% smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
HP Pavilion 23xw is only 509.18mm viewable width. That's 17.86mm smaller than the DELL SE2416H (509.18mm).
Smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 58.4cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 2.1cm smaller than the DELL SE2416H (58.4cm).
A lot slower response time Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a response time of 7ms, however the DELL E2416H is a 5ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster) and the DELL SE2416H is a 6ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

12% smaller color gamut Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a color gamut of 72%, whereas the DELL SE2416H is an 84% color gamut PC monitor (12% larger).
Higher power consumption (max) Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 27W maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 2W higher than the DELL SE2416H (27W).
340g heavier Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a weight of 3.3kg, whereas the DELL E2416H is a 2.9kg weight PC monitor (340g lighter) and the DELL SE2416H is a 3.2kg weight PC monitor (50g lighter).
More expensive by $53
The HP Pavilion 23xw is $30 more expensive than the DELL E2416H and $53 more expensive than the DELL SE2416H.
Fewer sellers
The HP Pavilion 23xw is only stocked by 4 shops, but the DELL E2416H is stocked by 10 retailers and the DELL SE2416H is stocked by 16 sellers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by six months
The HP Pavilion 23xw is two months older than the DELL E2416H and six months older than the DELL SE2416H.
Higher running costs over five years by $4.47
Over five years the HP Pavilion 23xw costs $32.03 to run which is $4.47 more to run than the DELL E2416H. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 1250 by number of sales in our PC monitors, whereas the DELL SE2416H ranks No. 138.

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

17 months Ago 13 months Ago 18 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 26.20
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.36
Total running cost $ 27.56
Purchase price $ 109.99
Total cost of ownership $ 137.55
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 38.83
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.16
Total running cost $ 39.99
Purchase price $ 86.99
Total cost of ownership $ 126.98
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 29.77
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 32.03
Purchase price $ 139.99
Total cost of ownership $ 172.02
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.18T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.18 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.26T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.26 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
24"
BEST
23.8" 23"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 296.46mm
BEST
286.42mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 527.04mm
BEST
509.18mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.27675 x 0.27675 0.2745 x 0.2745 0.265 x 0.265
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
Unknown - Click to provide data 60.5cm
BEST
58.4cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
6ms 7ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 84%
BEST
72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 96

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1 1
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Feet Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Card reader integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 22 -2 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
 Power LED
 Power LED
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
BEST
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
BEST
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
16.3W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W 0.22W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
22W 20W
BEST
25W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 32kWh
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 25W
BEST
27W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 90 5 - 90 20 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 10 - 80 20 - 70
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 40 0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.2kg
BEST
6.2kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.3kg 4kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
427.58mm 423.1mm 403.2mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
180mm 179.9mm 150.8mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
566.96mm 556.6mm 531.8mm
BEST
Weight
2.9kg
BEST
3.2kg 3.3kg
Height
334.58mm 330.1mm 322.2mm
Depth
50.5mm 55mm 50.6mm
Width
566.96mm 556.6mm 531.8mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
 Manual
Stand Included
 Stand included
 Stand included
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
User Guide On CD-ROM
 User Guide on CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback