DELL U2415 vs DELL UltraSharp 25

(169)
(229)
DELL U2415
DELL UltraSharp 25

Top Prices

No prices found
Best Buy
Checked 20 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 1 day ago
Out of stock
Adorama
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
34% faster response time Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 6ms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the DELL UltraSharp 25 (8ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more displayPorts quantity Edit
The number of displayPorts quantitys on the DELL U2415 is two, but the DELL UltraSharp 25 only has one displayPorts quantity.
Six USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The DELL U2415 has six USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the DELL UltraSharp 25 only has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Lower power consumption (max) Edit
DELL U2415 is 75W maximum power consumption, but the DELL UltraSharp 25 is an 87W maximum power consumption PC monitor (12W higher).
4% lighter Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 4.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 150g lighter than the DELL UltraSharp 25 (4.4kg).
$14.29 cheaper to run
The DELL U2415 only costs $29.65 to run over five years whereas the DELL UltraSharp 25 costs $43.94 to run (48% more). Read more
7 Reasons For
4% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is a 25" PC monitor. That's 0.9" bigger than the DELL U2415 (25"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has a display diagonal (metric) of 63.44cm. That's 2.34cm bigger than the DELL U2415 (63.44cm).
15% brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the DELL U2415 (350 cd/m²).
8% larger color gamut Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has a color gamut of 99%, however the DELL U2415 is only a 91% color gamut PC monitor (8% smaller).
One more awards
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has 2 awards from expert review sites, whereas the DELL U2415 has 1 award.
Considerably better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the DELL UltraSharp 25 is 100%, however the average rating of the DELL U2415 is 87% (based on 3 reviews).
Marginally better user reviews
The average user review score of the DELL UltraSharp 25 is 94%, however the average rating of the DELL U2415 is 91% (based on 166 reviews).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
0.9" smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2415 has a display diagonal of 24.1", but the DELL UltraSharp 25 is a 25" PC monitor (0.9" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A little smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
DELL U2415 is only 61.1cm display diagonal, but the DELL UltraSharp 25 is a 63.44cm display diagonal PC monitor (2.34cm bigger).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL U2415 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m², but the DELL UltraSharp 25 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Smaller color gamut Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 91% color gamut PC monitor. That's 8% smaller than the DELL UltraSharp 25 (99%).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Three months older
The DELL U2415 is older than the DELL UltraSharp 25 by three months.
Fewer awards
Whilst the DELL U2415 has received 1 award, the DELL UltraSharp 25 has received 2 awards.
A lot Lower expert review Score
The DELL U2415 has an average expert rating of 87%, but the DELL UltraSharp 25 has an average expert rating of 100% (based on 4 reviews).
Slightly Lower user review Score
The DELL U2415 has an average user rating of 91%, but the DELL UltraSharp 25 has an average user rating of 94% (based on 225 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has a response time of 8ms, but the DELL U2415 is a 6ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one displayPorts quantity Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has one displayPorts quantity, however the DELL U2415 only has two displayPorts quantitys.
One less USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is a five USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2415 only has six USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
14% higher power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has a power consumption (max) of 87W. That's 12W higher than the DELL U2415 (87W).
A little heavier Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has a weight of 4.4kg, however the DELL U2415 is a 4.3kg weight PC monitor (150g lighter).
Higher running costs over five years by $14.29
The running costs of the DELL UltraSharp 25 are $43.94 which is $14.29 more than the DELL U2415 over five years. Show assumptions.

Awards

1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
2 Awards
cnews.cz: Smart Buy
SweClockers.com: Good Product

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

28 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 27.39
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 29.65
Electricity cost - switched on $ 41.68
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 43.94
Purchase price $ 323.95
Total cost of ownership $ 367.89
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
24.1" 25"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
BEST
 1920 x 1200
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Display SRGB
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
611mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
Pixel Pitch
0.27 x 0.27 0.216 x 0.216
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
61.1cm 63.44cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms
BEST
8ms
Color Gamut
91% 99%
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:9
BEST
 16:10
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Audio Output
 Audio output
 Audio output
DisplayPorts Quantity
2
BEST
1
HDMI Ports Quantity
2 2
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
6
BEST
5
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Feet Colour
 Silver
 Silver
Colour of Product
 Silver
 Silver

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
115mm 115mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -21 - 5
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A
Power Consumption (typical)
23W
BEST
35W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption (max)
75W
BEST
87W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 90 5 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 40 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.4kg
BEST
9.8kg
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.8kg
Height (with Stand)
517.9mm 512.5mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
205mm 205mm
Width (with Stand)
532.2mm
BEST
569mm
Weight
4.3kg
BEST
4.4kg
Height
350.6mm 338.7mm
Depth
45.7mm 46.4mm
Width
532.2mm 569mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included

Technical Details

Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 311.04 x 552.96
Feedback