DELL P2715Q vs DELL U2713H vs DELL U2715H

(119)
(281)
(140)
DELL U2713H
DELL U2715H

Top Prices

B&H Photo
Checked 19 hours ago
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 13 hours ago
Out of stock
Adorama
Checked 7 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
Amazon US
Checked 22 hours ago
Out of stock
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
Amazon US
Checked 13 hours ago
Out of stock
ClaimThis Computer Warehouse
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
A bit bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
DELL P2715Q is 596.74mm viewable width (as does the DELL U2715H), but the DELL U2713H is only a 596.7mm viewable width PC monitor (0.039999999999964mm smaller).
One more displayPorts quantity Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a two displayPorts quantity PC monitor (as does the DELL U2715H), whereas the DELL U2713H only has one displayPorts quantity.
Available from 7 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Expert reviews are marginally better
Based on 2 expert reviews, the DELL P2715Q has an average review score of 85%, whereas the DELL U2713H has an average rating of 82% (based on 35 reviews) and the DELL U2715H has an average rating of 80% (based on 5 reviews).
4 Reasons For
Moderately bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
DELL U2713H is 335.7mm viewable height, but the DELL P2715Q and the DELL U2715H are both only 335.66mm viewable height PC monitors (0.039999999999964mm smaller).
1% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
DELL U2713H is 68.58cm display diagonal. That's 0.11cm bigger than the DELL P2715Q (68.5cm) and 0.079999999999998cm bigger than the DELL U2715H (68.5cm).
Cheaper by $66
The DELL U2713H costs $412.54, whereas the DELL P2715Q is $479.00 and the DELL U2715H is $519.99.
Fourteen more awards
The DELL U2713H has 15 awards from expert review sites, however the DELL P2715Q has 1 award.
10 Reasons For
0.039999999999964mm bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The DELL U2715H is a 596.74mm viewable width PC monitor (as does the DELL P2715Q), whereas the DELL U2713H is only a 596.7mm viewable width PC monitor (0.039999999999964mm smaller).
Eight times faster response time Edit
The DELL U2715H is an 8ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the DELL P2715Q (8ms) and 60.58ms faster than the DELL U2713H (8ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more displayPorts quantity Edit
The DELL U2715H has two displayPorts quantitys (as does the DELL P2715Q), however the DELL U2713H only has one displayPorts quantity.
Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The DELL U2715H has two HDMI ports quantitys, however the DELL U2713H only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Six USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The DELL U2715H is a six USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL P2715Q only has four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys and the DELL U2713H only has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
A lot lower power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL U2715H has a power consumption (max) of 88W, however the DELL P2715Q is a 95W maximum power consumption PC monitor (7W higher) and the DELL U2713H is a 130W maximum power consumption PC monitor (42W higher).
15% lighter Edit
The DELL U2715H is a 4.9kg weight PC monitor. That's 120g lighter than the DELL P2715Q (4.9kg) and 690g lighter than the DELL U2713H (4.9kg).
55% cheaper to run
The DELL U2715H only costs $45.13 to run over five years but the DELL P2715Q costs $100.02 to run (122% more) and the DELL U2713H costs $73.71 to run (63% more). Read more
More popular
The DELL U2715H is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 129 by sales volume in our PC monitors, however the DELL P2715Q ranks No. 130 and the DELL U2713H ranks No. 6378.
User reviews are better
The DELL U2715H has an average user review score of 94%, however the DELL P2715Q has an average rating of 88% (based on 117 reviews) and the DELL U2713H has an average rating of 80% (based on 246 reviews).

Reasons Against

12 Reasons Against
1% smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 335.66mm viewable height PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2715H. That's 0.039999999999964mm smaller than the DELL U2713H (335.66mm).
0.11cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 68.47cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2713H is a 68.58cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.11cm bigger) and the DELL U2715H is a 68.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.030000000000001cm bigger).
12% slower response time Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 9ms response time PC monitor. That's 59.58ms faster than the DELL U2713H (8ms) and 1ms slower than the DELL U2715H (8ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2713H, whereas the DELL U2715H only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Only four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the DELL P2715Q is four, but the DELL U2713H only has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys and the DELL U2715H only has six USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
7W higher power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 95W maximum power consumption PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2713H is a 130W maximum power consumption PC monitor (35W higher) and the DELL U2715H is an 88W maximum power consumption PC monitor (7W lower).
Heavier Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 5kg weight PC monitor. That's 570g lighter than the DELL U2713H (4.9kg) and 120g heavier than the DELL U2715H (4.9kg).
$66 more expensive
The DELL P2715Q is more expensive than the DELL U2713H by $66.46.
122% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the DELL P2715Q are $100.02 which is $26.31 more than the DELL U2713H and $54.89 more than the DELL U2715H over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The DELL P2715Q ranks No. 130 by sales volume, whereas the DELL U2715H ranks No. 129.
Fewer awards
Whilst the DELL P2715Q has received 1 award, the DELL U2713H has received 15 awards.
Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the DELL P2715Q is 88%, whereas the average user rating of the DELL U2715H is 94% (based on 135 reviews).
13 Reasons Against
Smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
The DELL U2713H has a viewable size, horizontal of 596.7mm. That's 0.039999999999964mm smaller than the DELL P2715Q and the DELL U2715H (596.74mm).
60.58ms slower response time Edit
The DELL U2713H has a response time of 68.58ms, whereas the DELL P2715Q is a 9ms response time PC monitor (59.58ms faster) and the DELL U2715H is an 8ms response time PC monitor (60.58ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one displayPorts quantity Edit
The number of displayPorts quantitys on the DELL U2713H is one, but the DELL U2715H only has two displayPorts quantitys.
One less HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL U2713H is one (as does the DELL P2715Q), but the DELL U2715H only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
One less USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The DELL U2713H has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the DELL U2715H only has six USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
33% higher power consumption (max) Edit
DELL U2713H is 130W maximum power consumption. That's 35W higher than the DELL P2715Q (88W) and 42W higher than the DELL U2715H (88W).
Heavier Edit
The DELL U2713H has a weight of 5.6kg, but the DELL P2715Q is a 5kg weight PC monitor (570g lighter) and the DELL U2715H is a 4.9kg weight PC monitor (690g lighter).
Not as many stockists
The DELL U2713H is only stocked by 2 retailers, however the DELL P2715Q is stocked by 9 stores and the DELL U2715H is stocked by 5 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by three months
The DELL U2713H is three months older than the DELL P2715Q and two months older than the DELL U2715H.
$28.58 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the running costs of the DELL U2713H are $73.71 which is $28.58 more than the DELL U2715H. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The DELL U2713H is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 6378 by number of sales in our PC monitors, but the DELL P2715Q ranks No. 130 and the DELL U2715H ranks No. 129.
Expert review Rating is a little Worse
The DELL U2713H has an average expert score of 82%, but the DELL P2715Q has an average expert rating of 85% (based on 2 reviews).
User review Rating is much Worse
The DELL U2713H has an average user score of 80%, but the DELL P2715Q has an average user rating of 88% (based on 117 reviews) and the DELL U2715H has an average user rating of 94% (based on 135 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
Smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The DELL U2715H has a viewable size, vertical of 335.66mm, and so does the DELL P2715Q. That's 0.039999999999964mm smaller than the DELL U2713H (335.66mm).
Slightly smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL U2715H has a display diagonal (metric) of 68.5cm, however the DELL P2715Q is a 68.47cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.030000000000001cm smaller) and the DELL U2713H is a 68.58cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.079999999999998cm bigger).
$107 more expensive
The DELL U2715H is more expensive than the DELL P2715Q by $40.99 and more expensive than the DELL U2713H by $107.45.
Less retailers
Only 5 sellers sells the DELL U2715H, whereas 9 sellers sell the DELL P2715Q. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
One month older
The DELL U2715H is older than the DELL P2715Q by one month.
Lower expert review Score
The DELL U2715H's average expert rating is 80%, however the DELL P2715Q's is 85% (based on 2 reviews) and the DELL U2713H's is 82% (based on 35 reviews).

Awards

1 Award
Digitaltrends.com: Editor's Choice
15 Awards
CNET.com: Editor's Choice
CNET.com.au: Editor's Choice
cnews.cz: Smart Buy
Expert Reviews: Ultimate
flatpanels.dk: Top Recommendation
flatpanelshd.com: Highly Recommended
hardware.info: Gold Award
hardwarecanucks.com: Dam Good
hwt.dk: Gold Product of the Year
itproportal.com: Best Buy
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
prad.de: Very Good
SweClockers.com: Good Product
ua.gecid.com: Gamer's Choice
vido.com.ua: Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

26 months Ago 29 months Ago 27 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 98.06
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.96
Total running cost $ 100.02
Purchase price $ 479.00
Total cost of ownership $ 579.02
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 71.45
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 73.71
Purchase price $ 412.54
Total cost of ownership $ 486.25
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 42.87
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 45.13
Purchase price $ 519.99
Total cost of ownership $ 565.12
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.65T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.65 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.49T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.49 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.3T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27" 27"
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3840 x 2160
 1600 x 900
 2560 x 1440
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 1600 x 900
 2560 x 1440
 3840 x 2160
 1600 x 900
 2560 x 1440
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 2160p
 1440p
BEST
 2160p
 1440p
 2160p
 1440p
Product Type
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Viewable Size, Vertical
335.66mm 335.7mm
BEST
335.66mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
596.74mm
BEST
596.7mm 596.74mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.1554 x 0.1554 0.23 x 0.23 0.2331 x 0.2331
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.47cm 68.58cm
BEST
68.5cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
9ms 68.58ms 8ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 91%
SmartResponse
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6ms
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Audio Output
 Audio output
 Audio output
 Audio output
DisplayPorts Quantity
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1 2
BEST
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
4 5 6
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Number of Upstream Ports
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 Black
 Silver
 Black
 Silver
 Black
 Silver
Colour of Product
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Card reader integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
Linux Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Linux operating systems supported
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 90 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 114mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 21
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 45 - 45
Wall Mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wall mountable
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators
 LED indicators

Power

Input Current
1.8A 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A
Power Consumption (typical)
50W 42W 36W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption (max)
95W 130W 88W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 0 - 5000 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 0 - 12192 0 - 12192
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 90 5 - 90 5 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 35 0 - 40 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
10.7kg 10.2kg
BEST
10.5kg
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 10.2kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
423.86mm
BEST
538.9mm 524.9mm
Depth (with Stand)
203.86mm 200.3mm
BEST
205mm
Width (with Stand)
640.74mm 639.3mm 612.7mm
BEST
Weight
5kg 5.6kg 4.9kg
BEST
Height
379.66mm 378.2mm 363.4mm
Depth
51.5mm 65.6mm 46.4mm
Width
640.74mm 639.3mm 612.7mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
Manual
 Manual
 Manual
 Manual
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
 AC adapter included
Feedback