HP Z22n vs Samsung S22E650D

HP Z22n
Samsung S22E650D

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 2 days ago
excessbuy
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
PC Rush
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
Checked 10 hours ago
In stock (371 available)
Factory Outlet Store
Checked 6 hours ago
In stock
Overstock
Checked 23 hours ago
PC Rush
Checked 48 minutes ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
Moderately bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The HP Z22n has a viewable size, horizontal of 476.06mm, however the Samsung S22E650D is only a 473.76mm viewable width PC monitor (2.3mm smaller).
Three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The HP Z22n has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the Samsung S22E650D only has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
20mm higher height adjustment Edit
The HP Z22n is a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 20mm higher than the Samsung S22E650D (130mm).
Lighter Edit
The HP Z22n is a 2.8kg weight PC monitor. That's 2.1kg lighter than the Samsung S22E650D (4.9kg).
$17 cheaper
The HP Z22n costs $149.99, whereas the Samsung S22E650D is $166.60.
5 Reasons For
Bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The Samsung S22E650D has a viewable size, vertical of 268.11mm. That's 0.31999999999999mm bigger than the HP Z22n (268.11mm).
Marginally bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Samsung S22E650D has a display diagonal (metric) of 54.61cm, however the HP Z22n is only a 54.6cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.009999999999998cm smaller).
75% faster response time Edit
The Samsung S22E650D is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the HP Z22n (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Available from 2 shops
A greater number of stores increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
15% cheaper to run
The Samsung S22E650D only costs $25.06 to run over five years but the HP Z22n costs $29.53 to run (18% more). Read more

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
1% smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
HP Z22n is only 267.79mm viewable height. That's 0.31999999999999mm smaller than the Samsung S22E650D (268.11mm).
0.009999999999998cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
HP Z22n is only 54.6cm display diagonal, but the Samsung S22E650D is a 54.61cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.009999999999998cm bigger).
Slower response time Edit
The HP Z22n is a 7ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Samsung S22E650D (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Not as many stockists
Only 4 shops sells the HP Z22n, however 6 retailers sell the Samsung S22E650D. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
18% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the HP Z22n costs $29.53 to run which is $4.47 more to run than the Samsung S22E650D. Show assumptions.
6 Reasons Against
2.3mm smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
The Samsung S22E650D is a 473.76mm viewable width PC monitor, whereas the HP Z22n is a 476.06mm viewable width PC monitor (2.3mm bigger).
Only two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The Samsung S22E650D is a two USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the HP Z22n only has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Lower height adjustment Edit
Samsung S22E650D is only 130mm maximum height adjustment. That's 20mm lower than the HP Z22n (130mm).
44% heavier Edit
The Samsung S22E650D is a 4.9kg weight PC monitor. That's 2.1kg heavier than the HP Z22n (4.9kg).
$17 more expensive
The Samsung S22E650D is more expensive than the HP Z22n by $16.61.
Seven months older
The Samsung S22E650D is older than the HP Z22n by seven months.

Date Released

15 months Ago 21 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 27.27
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 29.53
Purchase price $ 149.99
Total cost of ownership $ 179.52
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 25.01
Electricity cost - standby $ 0.05
Total running cost $ 25.06
Purchase price $ 166.60
Total cost of ownership $ 191.66
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
21.5" 21.5"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 5000000:1
BEST
 5000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Viewable Size, Vertical
267.79mm 268.11mm
BEST
Viewable Size, Horizontal
476.06mm
BEST
473.76mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.248 x 0.248 0.24825 x 0.24825
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
54.6cm 54.61cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
7ms 4ms
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data 200
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
3
BEST
2
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Number of Upstream Ports
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Recyclable Material
Unknown - Click to provide data 30%
Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Card reader integrated
Windows Operating Systems Supported
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 -1 - 95
Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
130mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 30 -3 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
-45 - 45 -45 - 45
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Power Consumption (off)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.01W
Power Consumption (typical)
22.9W 21W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.01W
BEST
Power Consumption (max)
34.7W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3

Operational Conditions

Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 95 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
20 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
5 - 35 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.2kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 375mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 185mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 577mm
Weight With Stand
4.8kg
BEST
4.9kg
Height (with Stand)
477.4mm
BEST
489.4mm
Depth (with Stand)
189mm
BEST
210mm
Width (with Stand)
488.1mm
BEST
504.3mm
Weight
2.8kg
BEST
4.9kg
Height
293.6mm 301.9mm
Depth
52.2mm 55.4mm
Width
488.1mm 504.3mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 VGA
 VGA
BEST
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User Guide on CD-ROM

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
No Flickering
Unknown - Click to provide data
 No flickering
Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback