AOC I2757F vs Asus MX279H vs DELL S2715H vs Samsung S27D590

(562)
(318)
(20)
(99)
AOC I2757F
Asus MX279H
Samsung S27D590

Top Prices

Best Buy
Checked 1 hour ago
Next day delivery: $26.81
In stock
Best Buy
Checked 23 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Factory Outlet Store
Checked 1 day ago
In stock
PC Rush
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found
eBay
Checked 23 hours ago
Amazon US
Checked 14 hours ago
Delivery unknown
world-bestbuy
Checked 23 hours ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
1ms faster response time Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 5ms response time PC monitor, and so do the Asus MX279H and the Samsung S27D590. That's 1ms faster than the DELL S2715H (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$70 cheaper
The AOC I2757F costs $169.99, whereas the Asus MX279H is $239.99 and the Samsung S27D590 is $299.99.
Eleven more awards
The AOC I2757F has 15 awards, however the Asus MX279H has 10 awards and the Samsung S27D590 has 4 awards.
Expert reviews are slightly better
The AOC I2757F has an average expert review score of 83% based on 38 reviews, but the Asus MX279H has an average rating of 80% (based on 35 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590 has an average rating of 81% (based on 20 reviews).
User reviews are slightly better
The AOC I2757F has an average user review score of 92% based on 524 reviews, but the Asus MX279H has an average rating of 88% (based on 283 reviews), the DELL S2715H has an average rating of 88% (based on 19 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590 has an average rating of 91% (based on 79 reviews).
5 Reasons For
HDCP Edit
The Asus MX279H has an HDCP, however the AOC I2757F does not have an HDCP.
Faster response time Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 5ms response time PC monitor, and so do the AOC I2757F and the Samsung S27D590. That's 1ms faster than the DELL S2715H (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The Asus MX279H has two HDMI ports quantitys, and so does the Samsung S27D590, however the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Available from 4 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
More popular
The Asus MX279H is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 3986 by sales volume in our PC monitors, however the AOC I2757F ranks No. 4238 and the Samsung S27D590 ranks No. 6602.
4 Reasons For
Two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The DELL S2715H has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the AOC I2757F only has one USB Type-A downstream ports quantity. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Asus MX279H or the Samsung S27D590. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

Vastly higher RMS rated power Edit
The DELL S2715H has an RMS rated power of 18W, however the Asus MX279H is only a 6W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (12W lower) and the Samsung S27D590 is only a 10W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (8W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Cable lock slot Edit
The DELL S2715H has a cable lock slot, whereas the AOC I2757F does not have a cable lock slot.
VESA mounting Edit
The DELL S2715H supports VESA mounting, however the AOC I2757F and the Asus MX279H do not support VESA mounting.
6 Reasons For
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m², however the AOC I2757F, the Asus MX279H and the DELL S2715H are all only 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 5ms response time PC monitor, and so do the AOC I2757F and the Asus MX279H. That's 1ms faster than the DELL S2715H (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has two HDMI ports quantitys, and so does the Asus MX279H, however the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI ports quantity.
25W lower power consumption (max) Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a power consumption (max) of 30W, however the DELL S2715H is a 55W maximum power consumption PC monitor (25W higher).
Lighter Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 4.4kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.3kg lighter than the AOC I2757F (4.4kg), 840g lighter than the Asus MX279H (4.4kg) and 500g lighter than the DELL S2715H (4.4kg).
35% cheaper to run
The Samsung S27D590 is $15.31 cheaper to run than the Asus MX279H and $11.37 cheaper to run than the DELL S2715H over five years. Read more

Reasons Against

10 Reasons Against
Does not have an HDCP Edit
The AOC I2757F does not have an HDCP, whereas the Asus MX279H does.
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The AOC I2757F has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as do the Asus MX279H and the DELL S2715H), but the Samsung S27D590 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the AOC I2757F is one, and so does the DELL S2715H, but the Samsung S27D590 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Only one USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The AOC I2757F has one USB Type-A downstream ports quantity, however the DELL S2715H only has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the Asus MX279H or the Samsung S27D590. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

Does not have a cable lock slot Edit
The AOC I2757F does not have a cable lock slot, however the DELL S2715H has a cable lock slot.
Does not support VESA mounting Edit
The AOC I2757F does not support VESA mounting (As does the the Asus MX279H), but the DELL S2715H does.
Heavier Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 5.7kg weight PC monitor. That's 500g heavier than the Asus MX279H (4.4kg), 840g heavier than the DELL S2715H (4.4kg) and 1.3kg heavier than the Samsung S27D590 (4.4kg).
Not as many stockists
Only 1 store sell the AOC I2757F, however 5 sellers sell the Asus MX279H and 3 sellers sell the Samsung S27D590. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Over two years older
The AOC I2757F is older than the Asus MX279H by six months, older than the DELL S2715H by two years and older than the Samsung S27D590 by 22 months.
Worse selling
The AOC I2757F ranks No. 4238 by sales volume, but the Asus MX279H ranks No. 3986.
10 Reasons Against
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus MX279H has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as do the AOC I2757F and the DELL S2715H), however the Samsung S27D590 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Two times lower RMS rated power Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 6W RMS rated audio power PC monitor, whereas the DELL S2715H is an 18W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (12W higher) and the Samsung S27D590 is a 10W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (4W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Does not support VESA mounting Edit
The Asus MX279H does not support VESA mounting (As does the the AOC I2757F), however the DELL S2715H supports VESA mounting.
17% heavier Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 5.2kg weight PC monitor. That's 500g lighter than the AOC I2757F (4.4kg), 340g heavier than the DELL S2715H (4.4kg) and 840g heavier than the Samsung S27D590 (4.4kg).
$70 more expensive
The Asus MX279H is more expensive than the AOC I2757F by $70.
Over one year older
The Asus MX279H is older than the DELL S2715H by 23 months and older than the Samsung S27D590 by 16 months.
53% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the running costs of the Asus MX279H are $44.06 which is $3.94 more than the DELL S2715H and $15.31 more than the Samsung S27D590. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards, the AOC I2757F has received 15 awards.
A little Lower expert review Score
The Asus MX279H's average expert rating is 80%, however the AOC I2757F's is 83% (based on 38 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590's is 81% (based on 20 reviews).
A little Lower user review Score
The Asus MX279H's average user rating is 88%, however the AOC I2757F's is 92% (based on 524 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590's is 91% (based on 79 reviews).
8 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL S2715H has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² (as do the AOC I2757F and the Asus MX279H), but the Samsung S27D590 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
1ms slower response time Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 6ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the AOC I2757F, the Asus MX279H and the Samsung S27D590 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL S2715H is one, and so does the AOC I2757F, but the Samsung S27D590 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
A lot higher power consumption (max) Edit
DELL S2715H is 55W maximum power consumption, but the Samsung S27D590 is a 30W maximum power consumption PC monitor (25W lower).
Heavier Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 4.9kg weight PC monitor. That's 840g lighter than the AOC I2757F (4.4kg), 340g lighter than the Asus MX279H (4.4kg) and 500g heavier than the Samsung S27D590 (4.4kg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
More expensive to run over five years by 40%
The running costs of the DELL S2715H are $40.12 which is $11.37 more than the Samsung S27D590 over five years. Show assumptions.
Marginally Lower user review Score
The DELL S2715H has an average user rating of 88%, but the AOC I2757F has an average user rating of 92% (based on 524 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 79 reviews).
8 Reasons Against
8W lower RMS rated power Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 10W RMS rated audio power PC monitor, whereas the Asus MX279H is a 6W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (4W lower) and the DELL S2715H is an 18W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (8W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

$130 more expensive
The Samsung S27D590 is more expensive than the AOC I2757F by $130 and more expensive than the Asus MX279H by $60.
Less retailers
Only 3 shops sells the Samsung S27D590, whereas 5 sellers sell the Asus MX279H. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Seven months older
The Samsung S27D590 is older than the DELL S2715H by seven months.
Worse selling
The Samsung S27D590 ranks No. 6602 by sales volume, however the AOC I2757F ranks No. 4238 and the Asus MX279H ranks No. 3986.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Samsung S27D590 has received 4 awards, the AOC I2757F has received 15 awards and the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards.
A bit Lower expert review Score
The Samsung S27D590's average expert rating is 81%, however the AOC I2757F's is 83% (based on 38 reviews).
A bit Lower user review Score
The Samsung S27D590's average user rating is 91%, however the AOC I2757F's is 92% (based on 524 reviews).

Awards

15 Awards
altomdata.dk: Recommended
elchapuzasinformatico.com: Silver
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hispazone.com: Recommended Product
in4.pl: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
macworld.co.uk: Editor's Choice
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Patented Design
thg.ru: Smart Buy
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
Tweak.dk: Great Product
10 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
ferra.ru: Recommended
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hardware.info: Silver Award
hardwaremx.com: Editor's Choice
techno-labs.com: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Editor's Choice
uk.hardware.info: Silver
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
No awards found 4 Awards
3dnews.ru: Innovative Design
gagadget.com: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
vido.com.ua: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

55 months Ago 49 months Ago 26 months Ago 34 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 44.06
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 44.06
Purchase price $ 239.99
Total cost of ownership $ 284.05
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 38.21
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.91
Total running cost $ 40.12
Electricity cost - switched on $ 27.39
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.36
Total running cost $ 28.75
Purchase price $ 299.99
Total cost of ownership $ 328.74
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.27T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.27 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.19T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.19 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
 Gloss
 Gloss
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Full HD
 Full HD
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 81
Viewable Size, Vertical
336.31mm Unknown - Click to provide data 336.31mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
597.89mm Unknown - Click to provide data 597.89mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178° 178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.6cm 68.6cm 68.6cm 68.6cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms
BEST
5ms
BEST
6ms 5ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 2
BEST
1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1 1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio System
Unknown - Click to provide data Bang & Olufsen ICEpower Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 6W 18W
BEST
10W
Number of Loudspeakers
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Built-In Subwoofer
 Built-in subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour of Product
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Mac Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating systems supported
Windows Operating Systems Supported
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 20 - -5 Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Tilt adjustment
Wall Mountable
 Wall mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
Number of OSD Languages
16 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
40W 37W 20W
BEST
23W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 44kWh
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 55W 30W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90 5 - 95
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 45
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8kg 8kg 8.8kg 6.8kg
BEST
Package Height
490mm 537mm Unknown - Click to provide data 132mm
BEST
Package Depth
140mm 114mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 439mm
Package Width
714mm 700mm Unknown - Click to provide data 689mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6.7kg 5kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 445mm
BEST
465mm
Depth (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 196mm 169.2mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 611.2mm
BEST
619.5mm
Weight
5.7kg 5.2kg 4.9kg 4.4kg
BEST
Height
449mm 441.3mm 361.5mm 388.6mm
Depth
130mm 225.2mm 46.1mm 58.5mm
Width
622mm 622.6mm 611.2mm 619.5mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 User Guide on CD-ROM

Other Features

Video Dot Rate
170MHz Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Volume Control
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital

Technical Details

Auto Power Off
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback