AOC U3477 vs LG 34UM95 vs Samsung S34E790C

(49)
(192)
(71)
AOC u3477
LG 34UM95
Samsung S34E790C

Top Prices

Best Buy
Checked 17 hours ago
In stock
Factory Outlet Store
Checked 2 days ago
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
No prices found
Factory Outlet Store
Checked 13 hours ago
In stock
Overstock
Checked 1 day ago
Amazon US
Checked 17 hours ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

10 Reasons For
Slightly bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
AOC u3477 is 86.7cm display diagonal, but the Samsung S34E790C is only an 86cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.7cm smaller).
20 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The AOC u3477 has a display brightness of 320 cd/m² (as does the LG 34UM95), but the Samsung S34E790C is only a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² dimmer).
Two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The AOC u3477 has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the Samsung S34E790C only has one USB Type-A downstream ports quantity. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the LG 34UM95. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

30mm higher height adjustment Edit
The AOC u3477 is a 130mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 30mm higher than the Samsung S34E790C (100mm).
Height adjustment Edit
The AOC u3477 has a height adjustment, and so does the Samsung S34E790C, whereas the LG 34UM95 does not have a height adjustment.
Four times lower power consumption (off) Edit
The AOC u3477 is a 0.1W power consumption when off PC monitor, whereas the LG 34UM95 is a 0.5W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.4W higher).
$419 cheaper
The AOC u3477 costs $599.99, whereas the Samsung S34E790C is $1,018.95.
Available from 2 shops
The more stores stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Eight more awards
The AOC u3477 has 12 awards, however the LG 34UM95 has 4 awards and the Samsung S34E790C has 4 awards.
Expert reviews are marginally better
The AOC u3477 has an average expert review score of 83%, but the LG 34UM95 has an average rating of 78% (based on 48 reviews) and the Samsung S34E790C has an average rating of 80% (based on 22 reviews).
5 Reasons For
7% brighter display brightness Edit
The LG 34UM95 is a 320 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the AOC u3477. That's 20 cd/m² brighter than the Samsung S34E790C (300 cd/m²).
Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The LG 34UM95 has a built-in speaker(s), and so does the Samsung S34E790C, whereas the AOC u3477 does not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

A lot lighter Edit
The LG 34UM95 has a weight of 6.7kg, whereas the AOC u3477 is a 10kg weight PC monitor (3.3kg heavier) and the Samsung S34E790C is a 7.4kg weight PC monitor (700g heavier).
Better selling
The LG 34UM95 ranks No. 3536 by number of sales, whereas the AOC u3477 ranks No. 60821 and the Samsung S34E790C ranks No. 3620.
Marginally better user reviews
The average user review score of the LG 34UM95 is 86% based on 144 reviews, whereas the average rating of the AOC u3477 is 85% (based on 13 reviews) and the average rating of the Samsung S34E790C is 83% (based on 49 reviews).
5 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung S34E790C is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the AOC u3477 and the LG 34UM95 (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The Samsung S34E790C has two HDMI ports quantitys, however the LG 34UM95 only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Samsung S34E790C has a built-in speaker(s) (as does the LG 34UM95), however the AOC u3477 does not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Height adjustment Edit
The Samsung S34E790C has a height adjustment, and so does the AOC u3477, but the LG 34UM95 does not.
22% cheaper to run
The Samsung S34E790C is $6.25 cheaper to run than the AOC u3477 and $22.23 cheaper to run than the LG 34UM95 over five years. Read more

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
1ms slower response time Edit
The AOC u3477 is a 5ms response time PC monitor, and so does the LG 34UM95. That's 1ms slower than the Samsung S34E790C (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the AOC u3477 is one, and so does the LG 34UM95, but the Samsung S34E790C only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The AOC u3477 does not have a built-in speaker(s), whereas the LG 34UM95 and the Samsung S34E790C have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

33% heavier Edit
The AOC u3477 is a 10kg weight PC monitor. That's 3.3kg heavier than the LG 34UM95 (7.4kg) and 2.6kg heavier than the Samsung S34E790C (7.4kg).
Five months older
The AOC u3477 is older than the Samsung S34E790C by five months.
More expensive to run over five years by 8%
The running costs of the AOC u3477 are $84.72 which is $6.25 more than the Samsung S34E790C over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The AOC u3477 ranks No. 60821 by sales volume, but the LG 34UM95 ranks No. 3536 and the Samsung S34E790C ranks No. 3620.
Marginally Lower user review Score
The AOC u3477 has an average user rating of 85%, but the LG 34UM95 has an average user rating of 86% (based on 144 reviews).
9 Reasons Against
20% slower response time Edit
The LG 34UM95 has a response time of 5ms (as does the AOC u3477), however the Samsung S34E790C is a 4ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI ports quantity Edit
The LG 34UM95 is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor (as does the AOC u3477), whereas the Samsung S34E790C only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The LG 34UM95 does not have a height adjustment, but the AOC u3477 and the Samsung S34E790C do.
80% higher power consumption (off) Edit
The LG 34UM95 has a power consumption (off) of 0.5W. That's 0.4W higher than the AOC u3477 ().
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by nine months
The LG 34UM95 is four months older than the AOC u3477 and nine months older than the Samsung S34E790C.
Higher running costs over five years by $22.23
The running costs of the LG 34UM95 are $100.70 which is $15.98 more than the AOC u3477 and $22.23 more than the Samsung S34E790C over five years. Show assumptions.
Eight less awards
The LG 34UM95 has only received 4 awards, but the AOC u3477 has received 12 awards.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The average expert rating of the LG 34UM95 is only 78%, whereas the average expert rating of the AOC u3477 is 83% (based on 36 reviews) and the Samsung S34E790C is 80% (based on 22 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
0.7cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Samsung S34E790C has a display diagonal (metric) of 86cm, however the AOC u3477 is an 86.7cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.7cm bigger).
Slightly dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S34E790C has a display brightness of 300 cd/m², however the AOC u3477 and the LG 34UM95 are both 320 cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (20 cd/m² brighter).
Only one USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The Samsung S34E790C is a one USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the AOC u3477 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the LG 34UM95. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.

Lower height adjustment Edit
Samsung S34E790C is only 100mm maximum height adjustment. That's 30mm lower than the AOC u3477 (100mm).
Heavier Edit
The Samsung S34E790C is a 7.4kg weight PC monitor. That's 2.6kg lighter than the AOC u3477 (7.4kg) and 700g heavier than the LG 34UM95 (7.4kg).
$419 more expensive
The Samsung S34E790C is more expensive than the AOC u3477 by $418.96.
Less retailers
Only 3 shops sells the Samsung S34E790C, whereas 5 sellers sell the AOC u3477. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Worse selling
The Samsung S34E790C ranks No. 3620 by sales volume, however the LG 34UM95 ranks No. 3536.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Samsung S34E790C has received 4 awards, the AOC u3477 has received 12 awards.
A bit Lower expert review Score
The Samsung S34E790C's average expert rating is 80%, however the AOC u3477's is 83% (based on 36 reviews).
A bit Lower user review Score
The Samsung S34E790C's average user rating is 83%, however the AOC u3477's is 85% (based on 13 reviews) and the LG 34UM95's is 86% (based on 144 reviews).

Awards

12 Awards
altomdata.dk: Recommended
benchmark.pl: Good Product
elektroniktest.dk: Gold
gamezoom.net: Recommended
hardware.info: Silver Award
kitguru.net: Must Have
mobimaniak.pl: Good Buy
nikktech.com: Silver
pcforalla.idg.se: Good Choice
pcgameware.co.uk: Gold
pclab.pl: Recommended
xtremehardware.com: Gold
4 Awards
Expert Reviews: Recommended
hardware.info: Silver Award
hotcases.de: Gold
vido.com.ua: Recommended
4 Awards
avforums.com: Recommended
benchmark.pl: Good Product
Trusted Reviews: Recommended
vido.com.ua: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

32 months Ago 36 months Ago 27 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 83.36
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.36
Total running cost $ 84.72
Purchase price $ 599.99
Total cost of ownership $ 684.71
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 95.27
Electricity cost - standby $ 5.43
Total running cost $ 100.70
Electricity cost - switched on $ 76.21
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 78.47
Purchase price $ 1,018.95
Total cost of ownership $ 1,097.42
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.57T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.57 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
15
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.67T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.67 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.52T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.52 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
34" 34" 34"
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3440 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
334.8mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
799.8mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
Vertical Scan Range
23 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 160 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.2325 x 0.2325 0.2325 x 0.2325 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 3000:1
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
86.7cm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 86cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
320 cd/m²
BEST
320 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 5ms 4ms
BEST
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 99% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Thunderbolt Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
 Headphone out
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Audio Output
 Audio output
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1 2
BEST
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 14W 14W
Number of Loudspeakers
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
 Card reader integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Mac Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating systems supported
Windows Operating Systems Supported
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
130mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 100mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
BEST
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 24 5 - 15 -2 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Indicators
 LED indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
 C
 C
BEST
Power Consumption (off)
0.1W
BEST
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
70W 80W 64W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.3W
BEST
1.2W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 93kWh
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 77W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
13.7kg 10.1kg
BEST
14.4kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 513mm
BEST
531mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 177mm
BEST
339mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 904mm 899mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.7kg
BEST
9.9kg
Height (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 468.9mm 452mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 172.9mm
BEST
275.5mm
Width (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 829.9mm 821.5mm
BEST
Weight
10kg 6.7kg
BEST
7.4kg
Height
624.5mm 379.8mm 364mm
Depth
229.2mm 82.9mm 51.5mm
Width
828mm 829.9mm 821.5mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
BEST
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
BEST
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 User Guide on CD-ROM

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
No Flickering
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 No flickering
Feedback