Share on
AOC Q2778 vs LG 27MP67

AOC Q2778 vs LG 27MP67

(38)
(5)
AOC Q2778
LG 27MP67

Top Prices

Overstock
Checked 21 hours ago
eBay
Checked 14 hours ago
Best Buy
Checked 6 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 7 hours ago
Out of stock
No prices found

Reasons For

1 Reason For
Four times faster response time Edit
The AOC Q2778 has a response time of 1ms, but the LG 27MP67 is a 5ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

4 Reasons For
Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
LG 27MP67 is 178° vertical viewing angle. That's 18° wider than the AOC Q2778 (178°).
A bit wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
LG 27MP67 is 178° horizontal viewing angle, but the AOC Q2778 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
$6.89 cheaper to run
The LG 27MP67 is $6.89 cheaper to run than the AOC Q2778 over five years. Read more
User reviews are appreciably better
Based on 5 user reviews, the LG 27MP67 has an average review score of 96%, but the AOC Q2778 has an average rating of 81% (based on 26 reviews).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
12% narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The AOC Q2778 has a viewing angle, vertical of 160°, however the LG 27MP67 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
Narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The AOC Q2778 has a viewing angle, horizontal of 170°. That's 8° narrower than the LG 27MP67 (178°).
$6.89 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs of the AOC Q2778 are $60.35 which is $6.89 more than the LG 27MP67 over five years. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is much Worse
The AOC Q2778's average user score is 81%, however the LG 27MP67's is 96% (based on 5 reviews).
3 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The LG 27MP67 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the AOC Q2778 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
One month older
The LG 27MP67 is older than the AOC Q2778 by one month.

Awards

5 Awards
HEXUS.net: Recommended
in4.pl: Best Buy
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
pcgameware.co.uk: Gold
pcmasters.de: Value for Money
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

27 months Ago 28 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 58.34
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 60.35
Purchase price $ 269.99
Total cost of ownership $ 330.34
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 52.29
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.17
Total running cost $ 53.46

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.38T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.38 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
10
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.34T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.34 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
Display
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.2331 x 0.2331 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.5cm 69cm
BEST
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
5ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-4 - 21 -3 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Child Lock
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Child lock
Plug & Play
 Plug & Play
 Plug & Play
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Power Consumption (off)
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
29.01W 26W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.29W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 94kWh
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
Unknown - Click to provide data
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
6.8kg 6.3kg
BEST
Package Height
555mm 442mm
BEST
Package Depth
215mm 154mm
BEST
Package Width
729mm 689mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
4.7kg 4.6kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
470.7mm 470mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
299.1mm 205mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
640.3mm 614mm
BEST
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.3kg
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 369mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 52mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 614mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included

Technical Details

Auto Power Off
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Auto power off
Feedback