Share on
Asus PB278Q vs DELL U2715H

Asus PB278Q vs DELL U2715H

(509)
(138)
Asus PB278Q
DELL U2715H

Top Prices

No prices found
Amazon US
Checked 18 hours ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
Hugely faster response time Edit
The Asus PB278Q has a response time of 5ms, but the DELL U2715H is an 8ms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Asus PB278Q has a built-in speaker(s), however the DELL U2715H does not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

A bit better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Asus PB278Q is 84%, however the average rating of the DELL U2715H is 80% (based on 4 reviews).
3 Reasons For
Two HDMI ports Edit
The DELL U2715H is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Asus PB278Q only has one HDMI port.
Cheaper to run by $48.26
The DELL U2715H is $48.26 cheaper to run than the Asus PB278Q over five years. Read more
User reviews are a little better
Based on 134 user reviews, the DELL U2715H has an average review score of 94%, whereas the Asus PB278Q has an average rating of 90% (based on 454 reviews).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
One less HDMI port Edit
The Asus PB278Q has one HDMI port, however the DELL U2715H only has two HDMI ports.
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by over two years
The Asus PB278Q is three years older than the DELL U2715H.
Higher running costs over five years by $48.26
The running costs over five years of the Asus PB278Q are $122.67 which is $48.26 more than the DELL U2715H. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is a bit Worse
The Asus PB278Q's average user score is 90%, however the DELL U2715H's is 94% (based on 134 reviews).
3 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The DELL U2715H is an 8ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Asus PB278Q (8ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The DELL U2715H does not have a built-in speaker(s), however the Asus PB278Q does. Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

A little Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the DELL U2715H is 80%, whereas the average expert rating of the Asus PB278Q is 84% (based on 55 reviews).

Awards

12 Awards
01net.com: 4 Star
chinese.vr-zone.com: Editor's Choice
datormagazin.se: Recommended
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
ferra.ru: Best Product
Good Gear Guide.com.au: Editor's Choice
hardware.info: Silver Award
hothardware.com: Recommended
noticias3d.com: Good Choice
overclock3d.net: Gold Award
technopat.net: Performance Award
uk.hardware.info: Silver
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

57 months Ago 27 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 120.66
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 122.67
Electricity cost - switched on $ 72.40
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.01
Total running cost $ 74.41

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.78T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.78 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
20
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.47T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.47 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27"
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
BEST
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1440p
 1440p
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
Full HD
 Full HD
Unknown - Click to provide data
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Display SRGB
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
24 - 89 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
684.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.66mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 596.74mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
24 - 89 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.233 x 0.233 0.2331 x 0.2331
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
Unknown - Click to provide data 68.58cm
Display Technology
 PLS
 PLS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms
BEST
8ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 91%
SmartResponse
Unknown - Click to provide data 6ms
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

PC Audio in
 PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
3W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 Silver
 Silver
Colour
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 90 - 90
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 5 - 21
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 45 - 45
Wall Mountable
 Wall mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
60W 36W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 88W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
12kg 10.5kg
BEST
Package Height
470mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
224mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
755mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
8.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
552.3mm 524.9mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
218mm 205mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
643mm 612.7mm
BEST
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.9kg
Height
386.2mm 363.4mm
Depth
69.6mm 46.4mm
Width
643mm 612.7mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 USB
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 USB
 AC
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
Feedback