Acer B276H vs Acer B286HK vs Acer XB280HK vs Acer XG270HU

(3)
(64)
(66)
(62)
Acer B276H
Acer B286HK
Acer XB280HK
Acer XG270HU

Top Prices

No prices found
Overstock
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
PC Rush
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
Newegg UK
Checked 1 day ago
Overstock
Checked 2 days ago
Delivery unknown
eBay
Checked 4 hours ago
Best Buy
Checked 3 hours ago
In stock
Amazon US
Checked 3 hours ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Acer B276H is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Acer XB280HK ().
Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Acer B276H has a built-in speaker(s) (as do the Acer B286HK and the Acer XG270HU), whereas the Acer XB280HK does not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Height adjustment Edit
The Acer B276H has a height adjustment, and so does the Acer XB280HK, however the Acer XG270HU does not.
21% lower power consumption (off) Edit
The Acer B276H has a power consumption (off) of 0.35W, however the Acer B286HK is a 0.4W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.05W higher) and the Acer XB280HK is a 0.42W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.07W higher).
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Acer B276H is "C", whereas the rating of the Acer B286HK is "C".
8 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer B286HK is a 28" PC monitor, and so does the Acer XB280HK. That's 1" bigger than the Acer B276H and the Acer XG270HU (27"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

4% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Acer B286HK has a display diagonal (metric) of 71.1cm, and so does the Acer XB280HK. That's 2.5cm bigger than the Acer B276H and the Acer XG270HU (68.6cm).
5x faster response time Edit
The Acer B286HK has a response time of 1ms (as do the Acer XB280HK and the Acer XG270HU), but the Acer B276H is a 6ms response time PC monitor (5ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Acer B286HK has a built-in speaker(s), and so do the Acer B276H and the Acer XG270HU, however the Acer XB280HK does not. Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer B286HK is a 66kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 9kWh lower than the Acer B276H ().
Cheaper by $69
The Acer B286HK costs $150.99 less than the Acer XB280HK and costs $68.76 less than the Acer XG270HU.
11% cheaper to run
Over five years the Acer B286HK only costs $48.70 to run but the Acer B276H costs $54.79 to run (13% more) and the Acer XB280HK costs $50.61 to run (4% more). Read more
Energy efficiency rating is better
The Acer B286HK has an energy efficiency rating of "C", however the Acer B276H has a rating of "C".
8 Reasons For
4% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer XB280HK is a 28" PC monitor, and so does the Acer B286HK. That's 1" bigger than the Acer B276H and the Acer XG270HU (27"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Acer XB280HK has a display diagonal (metric) of 71.1cm, and so does the Acer B286HK. That's 2.5cm bigger than the Acer B276H and the Acer XG270HU (68.6cm).
5x faster response time Edit
The Acer XB280HK has a response time of 1ms (as do the Acer B286HK and the Acer XG270HU), but the Acer B276H is a 6ms response time PC monitor (5ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Moderately higher height adjustment Edit
Acer XB280HK is 155mm maximum height adjustment, but the Acer B276H is only a 150mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (5mm lower).
Height adjustment Edit
The Acer XB280HK has a height adjustment (as does the Acer B276H), but the Acer XG270HU does not have a height adjustment.
VESA mounting Edit
The Acer XB280HK supports VESA mounting, whereas the Acer B276H does not.
Nine more awards
The Acer XB280HK has 12 awards from expert review sites, whereas the Acer B286HK has 3 awards and the Acer XG270HU has 8 awards.
Moderately better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Acer XB280HK is 81%, however the average rating of the Acer B286HK is 80% (based on 4 reviews) and the average rating of the Acer XG270HU is 70% (based on 21 reviews).
7 Reasons For
15% brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer XG270HU is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Acer B276H, the Acer B286HK and the Acer XB280HK (350 cd/m²).
5x faster response time Edit
The Acer XG270HU has a response time of 1ms (as do the Acer B286HK and the Acer XB280HK), but the Acer B276H is a 6ms response time PC monitor (5ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Acer XG270HU has a built-in speaker(s), and so do the Acer B276H and the Acer B286HK, however the Acer XB280HK does not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

A lot lighter Edit
The Acer XG270HU has a weight of 3.5kg, however the Acer B276H is a 5kg weight PC monitor (1.5kg heavier).
9 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Better selling
The Acer XG270HU ranks No. 1290 by number of sales, however the Acer B276H ranks No. 324795, the Acer B286HK ranks No. 5907 and the Acer XB280HK ranks No. 10720.
Better user reviews
The average user review score of the Acer XG270HU is 92% based on 41 reviews, however the average rating of the Acer B276H is 67% (based on 3 reviews), the average rating of the Acer B286HK is 72% (based on 60 reviews) and the average rating of the Acer XB280HK is 83% (based on 39 reviews).

Reasons Against

13 Reasons Against
Slightly smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer B276H has a display diagonal of 27" (as does the Acer XG270HU), whereas the Acer B286HK and the Acer XB280HK are both 28" PC monitors (1" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

2.5cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Acer B276H is a 68.6cm display diagonal PC monitor (as does the Acer XG270HU), whereas the Acer B286HK and the Acer XB280HK are both 71.1cm display diagonal PC monitors (2.5cm bigger).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer B276H has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as do the Acer B286HK and the Acer XB280HK), whereas the Acer XG270HU is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The Acer B276H is a 6ms response time PC monitor. That's 5ms slower than the Acer B286HK, the Acer XB280HK and the Acer XG270HU (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lower height adjustment Edit
The Acer B276H has a height adjustment of 150mm. That's 5mm lower than the Acer XB280HK ().
Does not support VESA mounting Edit
The Acer B276H does not support VESA mounting, whereas the Acer XB280HK supports VESA mounting.
12% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer B276H has an annual energy consumption of 75kWh, however the Acer B286HK is a 66kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (9kWh lower).
Heavier Edit
The Acer B276H is a 5kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.5kg heavier than the Acer XG270HU (3.5kg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Two months older
The Acer B276H is older than the Acer XG270HU by two months.
13% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the Acer B276H costs $54.79 to run which is $6.09 more to run than the Acer B286HK and $4.18 more to run than the Acer XB280HK. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Acer B276H ranks No. 324795 by sales volume, whereas the Acer B286HK ranks No. 5907, the Acer XB280HK ranks No. 10720 and the Acer XG270HU ranks No. 1290.
Significantly Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Acer B276H is only 67%, whereas the average user rating of the Acer B286HK is 72% (based on 60 reviews), the Acer XB280HK is 83% (based on 39 reviews) and the Acer XG270HU is 92% (based on 41 reviews).
8 Reasons Against
17% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer B286HK is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Acer B276H and the Acer XB280HK. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer XG270HU (350 cd/m²).
Higher power consumption (off) Edit
Acer B286HK is 0.4W power consumption when off. That's 0.05W higher than the Acer B276H () and 0.02W lower than the Acer XB280HK ().
Less retailers
The Acer B286HK is only stocked by 2 shops, whereas the Acer XB280HK is stocked by 4 retailers and the Acer XG270HU is stocked by 11 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by seven months
The Acer B286HK is five months older than the Acer B276H, two months older than the Acer XB280HK and seven months older than the Acer XG270HU.
Less popular
The Acer B286HK is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 5907 by number of sales in our PC monitors, however the Acer XG270HU ranks No. 1290.
Nine less awards
The Acer B286HK has only received 3 awards, whereas the Acer XB280HK has received 12 awards and the Acer XG270HU has received 8 awards.
Expert review Rating is moderately Worse
The Acer B286HK's average expert score is 80%, however the Acer XB280HK's is 81% (based on 27 reviews).
User review Rating is vastly Worse
The Acer B286HK's average user score is only 72%, however the Acer XB280HK's is 83% (based on 39 reviews) and the Acer XG270HU's is 92% (based on 41 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
12% narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Acer XB280HK has a viewing angle, vertical of 160°, however the Acer B276H is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
17% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer XB280HK is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Acer B276H and the Acer B286HK. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer XG270HU (350 cd/m²).
Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Acer XB280HK does not have a built-in speaker(s), but the Acer B276H, the Acer B286HK and the Acer XG270HU have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Higher power consumption (off) Edit
Acer XB280HK is 0.42W power consumption when off. That's 0.07W higher than the Acer B276H () and 0.02W higher than the Acer B286HK ().
More expensive by $151
The Acer XB280HK is $150.99 more expensive than the Acer B286HK and $82.23 more expensive than the Acer XG270HU.
Less retailers
The Acer XB280HK is only stocked by 4 stores, whereas the Acer XG270HU is stocked by 11 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by five months
The Acer XB280HK is three months older than the Acer B276H and five months older than the Acer XG270HU.
Higher running costs over five years by $1.91
The Acer XB280HK costs $50.61 to run which is $1.91 more to run than the Acer B286HK over five years. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The Acer XB280HK is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 10720 by number of sales in our PC monitors, however the Acer B286HK ranks No. 5907 and the Acer XG270HU ranks No. 1290.
User review Rating is Worse
The Acer XB280HK's average user score is 83%, however the Acer XG270HU's is 92% (based on 41 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
4% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer XG270HU is a 27" PC monitor, and so does the Acer B276H. That's 1" smaller than the Acer B286HK and the Acer XB280HK (27"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Acer XG270HU has a display diagonal (metric) of 68.6cm, and so does the Acer B276H. That's 2.5cm smaller than the Acer B286HK and the Acer XB280HK (68.6cm).
Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The Acer XG270HU does not have a height adjustment, whereas the Acer B276H and the Acer XB280HK do.
More expensive by $69
The Acer XG270HU is $68.76 more expensive than the Acer B286HK.
Four less awards
The Acer XG270HU has only received 8 awards, whereas the Acer XB280HK has received 12 awards.
Expert review Rating is considerably Worse
The Acer XG270HU's average expert score is only 70%, however the Acer B286HK's is 80% (based on 4 reviews) and the Acer XB280HK's is 81% (based on 27 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 3 Awards
Digitaltrends.com: Recommended Product
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
tomsguide.com: Editor's Choice
12 Awards
benchmark.pl: Good Product
Digitaltrends.com: Editor's Choice
hardware.info: Great Value
hothardware.com: Editor's Choice
insidehardware.it: Gold
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
nordichardware.se: Best Product
pcper.com: Gold
SweClockers.com: Good Product
thg.ru: Recommended
tomshw.it: Editor Recommended
vido.com.ua: Recommended
8 Awards
guru3d.com: Recommended
HEXUS.net: Approved
hispazone.com: Best for Games
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Recommended
tomshardware.com: Editor Recommended
tomshw.it: Editor Recommended
ua.gecid.com: The Choice of Gamers
vido.com.ua: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

24 months Ago 29 months Ago 27 months Ago 22 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 52.75
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.04
Total running cost $ 54.79
Electricity cost - switched on $ 46.44
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.26
Total running cost $ 48.70
Purchase price $ 388.99
Total cost of ownership $ 437.69
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 50.61
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 50.61
Purchase price $ 539.98
Total cost of ownership $ 590.59
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.37T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.37 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.33T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.33 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.34T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.34 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 28"
BEST
28"
BEST
27"
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.16 x 0.16 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178°
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 160° Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° Unknown - Click to provide data 178° Unknown - Click to provide data
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 900:1
 900:1
 900:1
BEST
 900:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.6cm 71.1cm
BEST
71.1cm
BEST
68.6cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms 1ms
BEST
1ms
BEST
1ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DC-In Jack
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DC-in jack
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1 1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 1 1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Grey
 Grey
 Grey
 Grey

Performance

NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
150mm Unknown - Click to provide data 155mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
BEST
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 35 -5 - 35 -5 - 35 -5 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
BEST
 C
BEST
 C
 C
Power Consumption (off)
0.35W
BEST
0.4W 0.42W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
44.3W 39W
BEST
42.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (standby)
0.45W
BEST
0.5W 0.48W Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption
75kWh 66kWh
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Voltage
 110
 220
 110-220
 110
 220
 110-220
 110
 220
 110-220
 110
 220
 110-220

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 MPR II
 TCO
 MPR II
 TCO
 MPR II
 TCO
 MPR II
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
7.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 3.9kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
550mm Unknown - Click to provide data 558.5mm 451mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
247mm 247.2mm 244.7mm 206mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
624mm 658.7mm 658.7mm 614mm
BEST
Weight
5kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 3.5kg
BEST
Height
370mm 381.9mm 381.8mm 368mm
Depth
64mm 64.5mm 64.5mm 37.5mm
Width
624mm 658.7mm 658.7mm 614mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
Feedback