It looks like you are browsing from
Go to Close
TVs & Displays
Photography & Video
Cooking Appliances
White Goods
Household
Technology
Home Latest Articles Irons 5 Best Irons Under $50 in the US - July 2020

5 Best Irons Under $50 in the US - July 2020

Matthew
Updated 05 June 2020
Share on


5 best irons under $50

What Iron Under $50 to Buy in June 2020?

Best Buy Great Price
Conair DPP143 Russell Hobbs 24820 Philips GC16002 Breville VIN369 Swan SI3070N
Conair DPP143 Russell Hobbs 24820 Philips GC16002 Breville VIN369 Swan SI3070N
$20.00 Buy Now
eBay
Buy Now
$20.09 Buy Now
4indoors Shop
Buy Now
$31.47 Buy Now
K.K. Electronics
Buy Now
$21.40 Buy Now
eBay
Buy Now
$13.75 Buy Now
Appliances Connection
Buy Now
800W
50g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
$62
OVER 5 YEARS
2,400W
90g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
0.24L
WATER TANK
1.4kg
1,200W
130g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
$92
OVER 5 YEARS
2,200W
30g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
0.25L
WATER TANK
900W
100g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
0.1L
WATER TANK
500g
$69
OVER 5 YEARS
94
Reviews
61 Reviews
87
Features
Fully-Featured
87
Popularity
Quite Popular
86
Value for Money
Very Good
97
Running Costs
$61 Over 5 Years
88
Kagoo Score
Excellent
96
Reviews
4 Reviews
86
Features
Fully-Featured
79
Popularity
Quite Popular
86
Value for Money
Very Good
87
Running Costs
$180 Over 5 Years
86
Kagoo Score
Excellent
96
Reviews
244 Reviews
86
Features
Fully-Featured
79
Popularity
Quite Popular
86
Value for Money
Very Good
96
Running Costs
$92 Over 5 Years
87
Kagoo Score
Excellent
97
Reviews
20 Reviews
87
Features
Fully-Featured
81
Popularity
Quite Popular
87
Value for Money
Very Good
94
Running Costs
$170 Over 5 Years
88
Kagoo Score
Excellent
94
Reviews
306 Reviews
84
Features
Fully-Featured
84
Value for Money
Very Good
97
Running Costs
$69 Over 5 Years
84
Kagoo Score
Excellent
A classic and staggeringly economical to run 800W traditional iron, with a good price and a very good spec. Our review analysis indicates that this iron isvery easy to use, a good size and really lightweight, and easy to handle. A positively reviewed and very economical to run 2,400W traditional iron, with a very good spec and an affordable price. It has a vertical steam function, a steam boost function and a steam generating capacity of 90g/min and supports variable steam function. An astoundingly economical to run and classic 1,200W traditional iron, with a good price and steam generating capacity. Our review analysis indicates that this iron isreally easy to use, lightweight and easy to handle and comfortable, and easy to hold. A classic and very economical to run 2,200W traditional iron, with a very good spec and a fair price. It has a vertical steam function and an anti-drip function, is self-cleaning and supports variable steam function. Customers report that it has good features and it's very easy to use. A classic and astoundingly economical to run 900W traditional iron, with an affordable price and a very good spec. Multiple reviews mentioned that it's very easy to use, a superb size but heavy and unwieldy.
5 Reasons For
Steam Boost Function
Better Kagoo Score
More Shops Are Selling It
$120 Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
Better in Terms of Size
5 Reasons For
Steam Boost Function
Vertical Steam Function
Variable Steam Function
Two Years Newer
User Reviews Are a Bit Better
5 Reasons For
100g/min More Steam Generating Capacity
Better Brand
More Reasonably Priced
Easier to Use
More Lightweight and Easy to Handle
7 Reasons For
A Lot Bigger Water Tank Capacity
Anti-Drip Function
Spray Function
Self-Cleaning
Vertical Steam Function
Variable Steam Function
Better Kagoo Score
1 Reason For
$6 Cheaper
6 Reasons Against
80g/min Less Steam Generating Capacity
$6 More Expensive
Over Six Years Older
Appreciably Lower User Review Score
Appreciably Lower Overall Review Score
Worse Brand
8 Reasons Against
40g/min Less Steam Generating Capacity
A Little Smaller Water Tank Capacity
Not Cordless
Worse Kagoo Score
$6 More Expensive
Fewer Sellers
200% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
Worse Brand
11 Reasons Against
Does Not Have an Automatic Shut Off System
Does Not Have an Auto Power Off Function
Not Cordless
Does Not Have a Steam Boost Function
Worse Kagoo Score
$18 More Expensive
Fewer Sellers
Over Four Years Older
50% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
Slightly Lower User Review Score
Slightly Lower Overall Review Score
8 Reasons Against
100g/min Less Steam Generating Capacity
$8 More Expensive
Less Retailers
Over Two Years Older
175% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
Lower User Review Score
Lower Overall Review Score
Worse Brand
15 Reasons Against
30g/min Less Steam Generating Capacity
910g Lighter
0.15L Smaller Water Tank Capacity
Not Cordless
Worse Kagoo Score
Less Retailers
Over Two Years Older
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 12%
Lower User Review Score
Lower Overall Review Score
Worse Brand
Less Reasonably Priced
Worse in Terms of Size
Harder to Use
Less Lightweight and Easy to Handle
 Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted
Full Details
Full Details
Full Details
Full Details
Full Details

Conair DPP143

$20.00
eBay

Conair DPP143

Buy Now
Conair DPP143
800W
50g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
$62
OVER 5 YEARS

The Conair DPP143 has a Kagoo Score of 88. With a price tag of $20.00 this iron is fair value for money. For further details check out our full review of the Conair DPP143.

Features We Love:
Steam boost function

A classic and staggeringly economical to run 800W traditional iron, with a good price and a very good spec. Our review analysis indicates that this iron isvery easy to use, a good size and really lightweight, and easy to handle.

94
Reviews
61 Reviews
87
Features
Fully-Featured
87
Popularity
Quite Popular
86
Value for Money
Very Good
97
Running Costs
$61 Over 5 Years
88
Kagoo Score
Excellent

Our review analysis indicates that Conair DPP143 has great user reviews with 80% of buyers recommending this iron to others.

5 Reasons For for Choosing the Conair DPP143

Steam Boost Function

The Conair DPP143 has a steam boost function (as does the Russell Hobbs 24820), whereas the Breville VIN369, the Philips GC16002 and the Swan SI3070N do not have this feature. More ...

A steam boost function allows the iron to temporarily dispense a more powerful blast of steam at the press of a button.

Steam boost serves to better iron extremely stubborn creases.

Better Kagoo Score

The Conair DPP143 has received a Kagoo Score of 88, but the Philips GC16002 scored 87, the Russell Hobbs 24820 scored 86 and the Swan SI3070N scored 84.

More Shops Are Selling It

A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this iron and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.

$120 Cheaper to Run Over Five Years

The Conair DPP143 is $108 cheaper to run than the Breville VIN369, $31 cheaper to run than the Philips GC16002, $123 cheaper to run than the Russell Hobbs 24820 and $8 cheaper to run than the Swan SI3070N over five years. More ...

Better in Terms of Size

Our analysis of the Conair DPP143 reviews indicates that more reviewers thought the Conair DPP143 was better in terms of size. Several people thought that it was a good size, was a big size and was compact.

6 Reasons Against for Choosing the Conair DPP143

80g/min Less Steam Generating Capacity

The Conair DPP143 has a steam generating capacity of 50, however the Breville VIN369 is a 30g/min steam capacity iron (20g/min less), the Philips GC16002 is a 130g/min steam capacity iron (80g/min more), the Russell Hobbs 24820 is a 90g/min steam capacity iron (40g/min more) and the Swan SI3070N is a 100g/min steam capacity iron (50g/min more). More ...

'Steam Generating Capacit' indicates how much steam the iron is capable of generating, measured in grams per minute (g/min).

A larger steam flow means that the iron is capable of more powerful steam blasts for longer, meaning the iron is more efficient at tackling stubborn creases and difficult fabrics.

$6 More Expensive

The Conair DPP143 is more expensive than the Swan SI3070N by $6.

Over Six Years Older

The Conair DPP143 is older than the Breville VIN369 by four years, older than the Philips GC16002 by 19 months, older than the Russell Hobbs 24820 by six years and older than the Swan SI3070N by four years.

Appreciably Lower User Review Score

The Conair DPP143 has an average user rating of 81%, but the Breville VIN369 has an average user rating of 88% (based on 20 reviews), the Philips GC16002 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 244 reviews), the Russell Hobbs 24820 has an average user rating of 95% (based on 4 reviews) and the Swan SI3070N has an average user rating of 86% (based on 306 reviews).

Appreciably Lower Overall Review Score

The Conair DPP143 has an average overall rating of 81%, but the Breville VIN369 has an average overall rating of 88% (based on 20 reviews), the Philips GC16002 has an average overall rating of 91% (based on 244 reviews), the Russell Hobbs 24820 has an average overall rating of 93% (based on 4 reviews) and the Swan SI3070N has an average overall rating of 86% (based on 306 reviews).

Worse Brand

Conair irons have an average rating of only 76.8%, however Breville has an average rating of 80.3%, Philips has an average rating of 95% and Russell Hobbs has an average rating of 89.7%.

The cheapest price that we could find for the DPP143 in the US is $20.00 and in total we found 5 prices for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$20.00
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$26.98
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$28.34
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$32.29
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$40.61
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
5 Prices from 5 Stores | $20.00 - $40.61
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices

Russell Hobbs 24820

$20.09
4indoors Shop

Russell Hobbs 24820

Buy Now
Russell Hobbs 24820
2,400W
90g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
0.24L
WATER TANK
1.4kg
$185
OVER 5 YEARS

The Russell Hobbs 24820 has a Kagoo Score of 86. With a price tag of $20.09 this iron is fair value for money. For further details check out our full review of the Russell Hobbs 24820 or read our article on whether you should buy a Russell Hobbs iron.

Features We Love:
Auto Steam Control
Many steam generating capacity (90g/min)
Steam boost function
Vertical steam function
Supports variable steam function

A positively reviewed and very economical to run 2,400W traditional iron, with a very good spec and an affordable price. It has a vertical steam function, a steam boost function and a steam generating capacity of 90g/min and supports variable steam function.

96
Reviews
4 Reviews
86
Features
Fully-Featured
79
Popularity
Quite Popular
86
Value for Money
Very Good
87
Running Costs
$180 Over 5 Years
86
Kagoo Score
Excellent

Owners report that Russell Hobbs 24820 has superb user reviews with an average user rating of 95%.

5 Reasons For for Choosing the Russell Hobbs 24820

Steam Boost Function

The Russell Hobbs 24820 has a steam boost function (as does the Conair DPP143), however the Breville VIN369, the Philips GC16002 and the Swan SI3070N do not have this feature. More ...

A steam boost function allows the iron to temporarily dispense a more powerful blast of steam at the press of a button.

Steam boost serves to better iron extremely stubborn creases.

Vertical Steam Function

The Russell Hobbs 24820 has a vertical steam function (as does the Breville VIN369), but the Conair DPP143, the Philips GC16002 and the Swan SI3070N do not have this feature. More ...

'Vertical Steam' denotes whether the iron has the capacity to produce a sustained burst of steam from the top of the device.

This is very helpful for hanging fabrics - such as giving hung-up shirts a quick steam to help get the creases out.

Variable Steam Function

The Russell Hobbs 24820 supports variable steam function (as does the Breville VIN369), but the Conair DPP143, the Philips GC16002 and the Swan SI3070N do not support this feature. More ...

'Variable Steam Function' indicates whether the iron has the capability of altering the power of the steam being released.

Some fabrics require more powerful steam blasts to best tame very stubborn creases.

Two Years Newer

The Russell Hobbs 24820 is two years newer than the Breville VIN369, six years newer than the Conair DPP143, five years newer than the Philips GC16002 and three years newer than the Swan SI3070N

User Reviews Are a Bit Better

Based on 4 reviews, the average user review score of the Russell Hobbs 24820 is 95%, whereas the average rating of the Breville VIN369 is 88% (based on 20 reviews), the average rating of the Conair DPP143 is 81% (based on 61 reviews), the average rating of the Philips GC16002 is 91% (based on 244 reviews) and the average rating of the Swan SI3070N is 86% (based on 306 reviews).

8 Reasons Against for Choosing the Russell Hobbs 24820

40g/min Less Steam Generating Capacity

Russell Hobbs 24820 is only 90 steam capacity, but the Breville VIN369 is a 30g/min steam capacity iron (60g/min less), the Conair DPP143 is a 50g/min steam capacity iron (40g/min less), the Philips GC16002 is a 130g/min steam capacity iron (40g/min more) and the Swan SI3070N is a 100g/min steam capacity iron (10g/min more). More ...

'Steam Generating Capacit' indicates how much steam the iron is capable of generating, measured in grams per minute (g/min).

A larger steam flow means that the iron is capable of more powerful steam blasts for longer, meaning the iron is more efficient at tackling stubborn creases and difficult fabrics.

A Little Smaller Water Tank Capacity

The Russell Hobbs 24820 has a water tank capacity of 0.24, however the Breville VIN369 and the Swan SI3070N are both 0.1L water tank capacity irons (0.14L smaller). More ...

'Capacity' indicates how much water the iron can hold at a single time.

A bigger tank capacity means the iron can be used longer before it needs to be refilled with water.

Not Cordless

The Russell Hobbs 24820 is not cordless (As do the the Philips GC16002 and the Swan SI3070N), whereas the Breville VIN369 and the Conair DPP143 are. More ...

'Cordless' denotes whether the iron has a power cord or not.

Cordless irons are far easier to use, and won't get twisted up and tangled. However they only have a limited life before they need to be recharged, whereas traditional corded irons can go on as long as you need.

Worse Kagoo Score

The Russell Hobbs 24820 has received a Kagoo Score of 86, whereas the Breville VIN369 scored 88, the Conair DPP143 scored 88 and the Philips GC16002 scored 87.

$6 More Expensive

The Russell Hobbs 24820 is more expensive than the Swan SI3070N by $6.

Fewer Sellers

Only 2 shops sells the Russell Hobbs 24820, but 5 shops sell the Conair DPP143. More ...

The smaller the number of retailers that stock this iron, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
200% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years

The running costs over five years of the Russell Hobbs 24820 are $185 which is $15 more than the Breville VIN369, $123 more than the Conair DPP143, $92 more than the Philips GC16002 and $116 more than the Swan SI3070N. Show assumptions.

Worse Brand

Russell Hobbs irons have an average rating of only 89.7%, but Philips has an average rating of 95%.

The cheapest price that we could find for the 24820 in the US is $20.09 but in total we found only 2 prices for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
loading image
Store
$20.09
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$22.30
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | $20.09 - $22.30
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices

Philips GC16002

$31.47
K.K. Electronics

Philips GC16002

Buy Now
Philips GC16002
1,200W
130g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
$92
OVER 5 YEARS

The Philips GC16002 has a Kagoo Score of 87. However with a price tag of $31.47 this iron is a bit expensive. For further details check out our full review of the Philips GC16002 or read our article on whether you should buy a Philips iron.

Features We Love:
Many steam generating capacity (130g/min)
Features soft grip

An astoundingly economical to run and classic 1,200W traditional iron, with a good price and steam generating capacity. Our review analysis indicates that this iron isreally easy to use, lightweight and easy to handle and comfortable, and easy to hold.

96
Reviews
244 Reviews
86
Features
Fully-Featured
79
Popularity
Quite Popular
86
Value for Money
Very Good
96
Running Costs
$92 Over 5 Years
87
Kagoo Score
Excellent

Owners report that Philips GC16002 has brilliant user reviews with an average user rating of 91%, based on 244 reviews.

REVIEW PHILIPS, SETRIKA #05 Setrika GC160 Affinia
REVIEW PHILIPS, SETRIKA #05 Setrika GC160 Affinia

5 Reasons For for Choosing the Philips GC16002

100g/min More Steam Generating Capacity

Philips GC16002 is 130 steam capacity, but the Breville VIN369 is only a 30g/min steam capacity iron (100g/min less), the Conair DPP143 is only a 50g/min steam capacity iron (80g/min less), the Russell Hobbs 24820 is only a 90g/min steam capacity iron (40g/min less) and the Swan SI3070N is only a 100g/min steam capacity iron (30g/min less). More ...

'Steam Generating Capacit' indicates how much steam the iron is capable of generating, measured in grams per minute (g/min).

A larger steam flow means that the iron is capable of more powerful steam blasts for longer, meaning the iron is more efficient at tackling stubborn creases and difficult fabrics.

Better Brand

Philips irons have an average rating of 95%, but Breville only has an average rating of 80.3%, Conair only has an average rating of 76.8%, Russell Hobbs only has an average rating of 89.7% and Swan only has an average rating of 75.7%.

More Reasonably Priced

Our analysis of the Philips GC16002 reviews indicates that more reviewers thought the Philips GC16002 was more reasonably priced.

Easier to Use

Our analysis of the Philips GC16002 reviews indicates that more reviewers thought the Philips GC16002 was easier to use. Over 20 people thought that it was very easy to use and seven people thought that it was also comfortable and easy to hold.

More Lightweight and Easy to Handle

On average reviewers thought the Philips GC16002 was more lightweight and easy to handle. Over 20 people thought that it was lightweight and easy to handle and five people thought that it also wasn't heavy and unwieldy.

11 Reasons Against for Choosing the Philips GC16002

Does Not Have an Automatic Shut Off System

The Philips GC16002 does not have an automatic shut off system, whereas the Breville VIN369, the Conair DPP143, the Russell Hobbs 24820 and the Swan SI3070N do. More ...

'Automatic Shut Off System' denotes whether the iron has a safety system to automatically cut the power to the iron if it detects a fault (such as a power surge, wire fault, water leak, etc). It can also kill the power after a certain time, in cause you've left the iron unattended by accident.

An automatic shut off system helps keep you safe by removing the power during a potential accident, of if you leave the iron unattended.

Does Not Have an Auto Power Off Function

The Philips GC16002 does not have an auto power off function, however the Breville VIN369, the Conair DPP143, the Russell Hobbs 24820 and the Swan SI3070N do. More ...

'Auto Power-Off Function' denotes whether the iron has a safety system to automatically cut the power to the iron if it detects a fault (such as a power surge, wire fault, water leak, etc). It can also kill the power after a certain time, in cause you've left the iron unattended by accident.

An automatic shut off system helps keep you safe by removing the power during a potential accident, of if you leave the iron unattended.

Not Cordless

The Philips GC16002 is not cordless (As do the the Russell Hobbs 24820 and the Swan SI3070N), whereas the Breville VIN369 and the Conair DPP143 are. More ...

'Cordless' denotes whether the iron has a power cord or not.

Cordless irons are far easier to use, and won't get twisted up and tangled. However they only have a limited life before they need to be recharged, whereas traditional corded irons can go on as long as you need.

Does Not Have a Steam Boost Function

The Philips GC16002 does not have a steam boost function, but the Breville VIN369, the Conair DPP143, the Russell Hobbs 24820 and the Swan SI3070N do. More ...

A steam boost function allows the iron to temporarily dispense a more powerful blast of steam at the press of a button.

Steam boost serves to better iron extremely stubborn creases.

Worse Kagoo Score

The Philips GC16002 has received a Kagoo Score of 87, whereas the Breville VIN369 scored 88 and the Conair DPP143 scored 88.

$18 More Expensive

The Philips GC16002 is more expensive than the Breville VIN369 by $10, more expensive than the Conair DPP143 by $11, more expensive than the Russell Hobbs 24820 by $11 and more expensive than the Swan SI3070N by $18.

Fewer Sellers

Only 2 stores sells the Philips GC16002, but 5 stores sell the Conair DPP143. More ...

The smaller the number of retailers that stock this iron, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Over Four Years Older

The Philips GC16002 is older than the Breville VIN369 by three years, older than the Russell Hobbs 24820 by five years and older than the Swan SI3070N by two years.

50% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years

Over five years the Philips GC16002 costs $92 to run which is $31 more than the Conair DPP143 and $23 more than the Swan SI3070N. Show assumptions.

Slightly Lower User Review Score

The average user rating of the Philips GC16002 is 91%, whereas the average user rating of the Russell Hobbs 24820 is 95% (based on 4 reviews).

Slightly Lower Overall Review Score

The average overall rating of the Philips GC16002 is 91%, whereas the average overall rating of the Russell Hobbs 24820 is 93% (based on 4 reviews).

The cheapest price that we could find for the GC16002 in the US is $31.47 but in total we found only 2 prices for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
loading image
Official Outlet
$31.47
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$35.88
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | $31.47 - $35.88
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices

Breville VIN369

$21.40
eBay

Breville VIN369

Buy Now
Breville VIN369
2,200W
30g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
0.25L
WATER TANK
$170
OVER 5 YEARS

The Breville VIN369 has a Kagoo Score of 88. With a price tag of $21.40 this iron is fair value for money. For further details check out our full review of the Breville VIN369 or read our article on whether you should buy a Breville iron.

Features We Love:
Vertical steam function
Supports variable steam function
Self-cleaning
Anti-drip function
Spray function

A classic and very economical to run 2,200W traditional iron, with a very good spec and a fair price. It has a vertical steam function and an anti-drip function, is self-cleaning and supports variable steam function. Customers report that it has good features and it's very easy to use.

97
Reviews
20 Reviews
87
Features
Fully-Featured
81
Popularity
Quite Popular
87
Value for Money
Very Good
94
Running Costs
$170 Over 5 Years
88
Kagoo Score
Excellent

Multiple reviews mentioned that Breville VIN369 has great user reviews with an average user rating of 88%, based on 20 reviews.

7 Reasons For for Choosing the Breville VIN369

A Lot Bigger Water Tank Capacity

The Breville VIN369 has a water tank capacity of 0.25, but the Russell Hobbs 24820 and the Swan SI3070N are both only 0.1L water tank capacity irons (0.15L smaller). More ...

'Capacity' indicates how much water the iron can hold at a single time.

A bigger tank capacity means the iron can be used longer before it needs to be refilled with water.

Anti-Drip Function

The Breville VIN369 has an anti-drip function, but the Conair DPP143, the Philips GC16002, the Russell Hobbs 24820 and the Swan SI3070N do not. More ...

'Anti-Drip Function' denotes whether the iron has a special function to stop water from dripping from the iron after you've used the steam function.

An anti-drip system can help stop you making a mess while ironing.

Spray Function

The Breville VIN369 has an spray function, however the Conair DPP143, the Philips GC16002, the Russell Hobbs 24820 and the Swan SI3070N do not have this feature. More ...

'Spray Function' indicates whether the iron has the ability to spray out a fine mist of water.

Spraying water on fabric serves to moisten it, making it easier to iron.

Self-Cleaning

The Breville VIN369 is self-cleaning, but the Conair DPP143, the Philips GC16002, the Russell Hobbs 24820 and the Swan SI3070N are not. More ...

'Self-Cleaning' indicates whether the iron has a special cycle to clean itself after a set amount of time (e.g - 2 weeks). It works by flushing through the iron and soleplate with very hot water, removing any impurities that have built up.

A self-cleaning iron can help prolong the life of the appliance, and keep it in peak condition for longer.

Vertical Steam Function

The Breville VIN369 has a vertical steam function (as does the Russell Hobbs 24820), whereas the Conair DPP143, the Philips GC16002 and the Swan SI3070N do not have this feature. More ...

'Vertical Steam' denotes whether the iron has the capacity to produce a sustained burst of steam from the top of the device.

This is very helpful for hanging fabrics - such as giving hung-up shirts a quick steam to help get the creases out.

Variable Steam Function

The Breville VIN369 supports variable steam function (as does the Russell Hobbs 24820), whereas the Conair DPP143, the Philips GC16002 and the Swan SI3070N do not support this feature. More ...

'Variable Steam Function' indicates whether the iron has the capability of altering the power of the steam being released.

Some fabrics require more powerful steam blasts to best tame very stubborn creases.

Better Kagoo Score

The Breville VIN369 has received a Kagoo Score of 88, however the Philips GC16002 scored 87, the Russell Hobbs 24820 scored 86 and the Swan SI3070N scored 84.

8 Reasons Against for Choosing the Breville VIN369

100g/min Less Steam Generating Capacity

The Breville VIN369 is a 30 steam capacity iron, whereas the Conair DPP143 is a 50g/min steam capacity iron (20g/min more), the Philips GC16002 is a 130g/min steam capacity iron (100g/min more), the Russell Hobbs 24820 is a 90g/min steam capacity iron (60g/min more) and the Swan SI3070N is a 100g/min steam capacity iron (70g/min more). More ...

'Steam Generating Capacit' indicates how much steam the iron is capable of generating, measured in grams per minute (g/min).

A larger steam flow means that the iron is capable of more powerful steam blasts for longer, meaning the iron is more efficient at tackling stubborn creases and difficult fabrics.

$8 More Expensive

The Breville VIN369 is more expensive than the Swan SI3070N by $8.

Less Retailers

Only 2 stores sells the Breville VIN369, whereas 5 sellers sell the Conair DPP143. More ...

Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this iron and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Over Two Years Older

The Breville VIN369 is older than the Russell Hobbs 24820 by two years.

175% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years

Over five years the Breville VIN369 costs $170 to run which is $108 more than the Conair DPP143, $77 more than the Philips GC16002 and $100 more than the Swan SI3070N. Show assumptions.

Lower User Review Score

The Breville VIN369's average user rating is 88%, however the Philips GC16002's is 91% (based on 244 reviews) and the Russell Hobbs 24820's is 95% (based on 4 reviews).

Lower Overall Review Score

The Breville VIN369's average overall rating is 88%, however the Philips GC16002's is 91% (based on 244 reviews) and the Russell Hobbs 24820's is 93% (based on 4 reviews).

Worse Brand

Breville irons have an average rating of only 80.3%, whereas Philips has an average rating of 95% and Russell Hobbs has an average rating of 89.7%.

The cheapest price that we could find for the VIN369 in the US is $21.40 but in total we found only 2 prices for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$21.40
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$22.61
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | $21.40 - $22.61
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices

Swan SI3070N

$13.75
Appliances Connection

Swan SI3070N

Buy Now
Swan SI3070N
900W
100g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
0.1L
WATER TANK
500g
$69
OVER 5 YEARS

The Swan SI3070N has a Kagoo Score of 84. With a price tag of $13.75 this iron is good value for money. For further details check out our full review of the Swan SI3070N.

Features We Love:
Many steam generating capacity (100g/min)
Adjustable thermostat

A classic and astoundingly economical to run 900W traditional iron, with an affordable price and a very good spec. Multiple reviews mentioned that it's very easy to use, a superb size but heavy and unwieldy.

94
Reviews
306 Reviews
84
Features
Fully-Featured
84
Value for Money
Very Good
97
Running Costs
$69 Over 5 Years
84
Kagoo Score
Excellent

Purchasers report that Swan SI3070N has very good user reviews with an average user rating of 86%, based on 306 reviews.

1 Reason For for Choosing the Swan SI3070N

$6 Cheaper

The Swan SI3070N costs $7.65 less than the Breville VIN369, costs $6.25 less than the Conair DPP143, costs $17.72 less than the Philips GC16002 and costs $6.34 less than the Russell Hobbs 24820.

15 Reasons Against for Choosing the Swan SI3070N

30g/min Less Steam Generating Capacity

The Swan SI3070N is a 100 steam capacity iron, whereas the Breville VIN369 is a 30g/min steam capacity iron (70g/min less), the Conair DPP143 is a 50g/min steam capacity iron (50g/min less), the Philips GC16002 is a 130g/min steam capacity iron (30g/min more) and the Russell Hobbs 24820 is a 90g/min steam capacity iron (10g/min less). More ...

'Steam Generating Capacit' indicates how much steam the iron is capable of generating, measured in grams per minute (g/min).

A larger steam flow means that the iron is capable of more powerful steam blasts for longer, meaning the iron is more efficient at tackling stubborn creases and difficult fabrics.

910g Lighter

The Swan SI3070N has a weight of 500, however the Russell Hobbs 24820 is a 1.4kg iron (910g heavier). More ...

'Weight' denotes how heavy the iron is, measured in grams (g).

A heavier iron can be an advantage as it makes it easier to press the clothes.

0.15L Smaller Water Tank Capacity

The Swan SI3070N has a water tank capacity of 0.1, but the Breville VIN369 and the Russell Hobbs 24820 are both 0.24L water tank capacity irons (0.14L bigger). More ...

'Capacity' indicates how much water the iron can hold at a single time.

A bigger tank capacity means the iron can be used longer before it needs to be refilled with water.

Not Cordless

The Swan SI3070N is not cordless (As do the the Philips GC16002 and the Russell Hobbs 24820), however the Breville VIN369 and the Conair DPP143 are. More ...

'Cordless' denotes whether the iron has a power cord or not.

Cordless irons are far easier to use, and won't get twisted up and tangled. However they only have a limited life before they need to be recharged, whereas traditional corded irons can go on as long as you need.

Worse Kagoo Score

The Swan SI3070N has received a Kagoo Score of 84, however the Breville VIN369 scored 88, the Conair DPP143 scored 88, the Philips GC16002 scored 87 and the Russell Hobbs 24820 scored 86.

Less Retailers

Only 2 stores sells the Swan SI3070N, whereas 5 shops sell the Conair DPP143. More ...

Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this iron and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Over Two Years Older

The Swan SI3070N is older than the Breville VIN369 by four months and older than the Russell Hobbs 24820 by three years.

More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 12%

Over five years the Swan SI3070N costs $69 to run which is $8 more than the Conair DPP143. Show assumptions.

Lower User Review Score

The Swan SI3070N's average user rating is 86%, however the Breville VIN369's is 88% (based on 20 reviews), the Philips GC16002's is 91% (based on 244 reviews) and the Russell Hobbs 24820's is 95% (based on 4 reviews).

Lower Overall Review Score

The Swan SI3070N's average overall rating is 86%, however the Breville VIN369's is 88% (based on 20 reviews), the Philips GC16002's is 91% (based on 244 reviews) and the Russell Hobbs 24820's is 93% (based on 4 reviews).

Worse Brand

Swan irons have an average rating of only 75.7%, whereas Breville has an average rating of 80.3%, Conair has an average rating of 76.8%, Philips has an average rating of 95% and Russell Hobbs has an average rating of 89.7%.

Less Reasonably Priced

Our analysis of the Swan SI3070N reviews indicates that more reviewers thought the Swan SI3070N was less reasonably priced.

Worse in Terms of Size

Our analysis of the Swan SI3070N reviews indicates that more reviewers thought the Swan SI3070N was worse in terms of size.

Harder to Use

On average reviewers thought the Swan SI3070N was harder to use.

Less Lightweight and Easy to Handle

The Swan SI3070N reviewers thought the Swan SI3070N was less lightweight and easy to handle.

The cheapest price that we could find for the SI3070N in the US is $13.75 but in total we found only 2 prices for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
loading image
$13.75
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
Store
$18.26
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | $13.75 - $18.26
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices
Share on
Compare All Irons
Find the best iron for you by checking our complete list of over 104 irons.

Signup For Our Free Iron Deals Newsletter

1,000s of Deals Coupons Price Drops Free No Spam
Sign Up
Save Password

Select Deal Types That You Are Interested In

Finish
In This Guide
5 Best Irons Under $50 in the US - July 2020
Conair DPP143
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices
Russell Hobbs 24820
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices
Philips GC16002
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices
Breville VIN369
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices
Swan SI3070N
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices

Today's Best Iron Sales

$39 Price Drop
loading image
$395
$355.50
2,200W
120g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
$170
OVER 5 YEARS
$21 Price Drop
loading image
$99
$77.27
1,700W
220g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
$131
OVER 5 YEARS
$21 Price Drop
loading image
$210
$189.00
3,100W
65g/min
STEAM
CAPACITY
0.4L
WATER TANK
$59 Price Drop
Novel design, strong and durable.Suitable for restaurant, hotel, canteen, and butcher.Can be twisted diced meat, noodles, sausages and grind coffee,etc.manual meat... more

×