TVs & Displays Photography & Video Cooking Appliances White Goods Household Technology
Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW vs GE FCM7SKWW
Compare All Freezers
Top Prices Reasons For Reviews & Awards Date Released Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

Frigidaire FFFH17F2QWvsGE FCM7SKWW

Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
An award winning and best selling upright freezer, with very good features and a stunningly high 453L freezer net capacity
98
Reviews
50 Reviews + 1 Award
74
Value for Money
Good
87
Features
Fully-Featured
77
Running Costs
$870 Over 10 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
453L Upright 863.6mm 1,524mm Jan 2015
Freezer Net Capacity Type Width Height Release Date
Freezer Net Capacity 453L
Type Upright
Width 863.6mm
Height 1,524mm
Release Date Jan 2015
GE FCM7SKWW

74

Overall Score

74

Overall Score

GE FCM7SKWW

$214.99
Our Verdict:
A fully featured but only OK value for money 198L capacity freezer, with satisfactory running costs
66
Value for Money
Good
83
Features
Fully-Featured
69
Running Costs
$4,400 Over 10 Years
74
Overall Score
Very Good
198L Chest 946.15mm 850.9mm Apr 2017
Freezer Net Capacity Type Width Height Release Date
Freezer Net Capacity 198L
Type Chest
Width 946.15mm
Height 850.9mm
Release Date Apr 2017
Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
An award winning and best selling upright freezer, with very good features and a stunningly high 453L freezer net capacity
98
Reviews
50 Reviews + 1 Award
74
Value for Money
Good
87
Features
Fully-Featured
77
Running Costs
$870 Over 10 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
453L Upright 863.6mm 1,524mm Jan 2015
Freezer Net Capacity Type Width Height Release Date
Freezer Net Capacity 453L
Type Upright
Width 863.6mm
Height 1,524mm
Release Date Jan 2015
GE FCM7SKWW

74

Overall Score

74

Overall Score

GE FCM7SKWW

$214.99
Our Verdict:
A fully featured but only OK value for money 198L capacity freezer, with satisfactory running costs
66
Value for Money
Good
83
Features
Fully-Featured
69
Running Costs
$4,400 Over 10 Years
74
Overall Score
Very Good
198L Chest 946.15mm 850.9mm Apr 2017
Freezer Net Capacity Type Width Height Release Date
Freezer Net Capacity 198L
Type Chest
Width 946.15mm
Height 850.9mm
Release Date Apr 2017

Top Prices

Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW GE FCM7SKWW
Store
Ex-Display13 hours agoEBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$519.00
Go to Store
52 minutes agoStore Pickup Available1 Year Warranty
$549.99
Go to Store
Offical Outlet
13 hours ago
$679.99
Go to Store
3 Prices from 3 Stores | $519.00-$679.99
52 minutes ago1 Year WarrantyStore Pickup: Not Available
$214.99
Go to Store
11 hours agoSave More With Coupon Codes
$329.00
Go to Store
Walmart
$378.35
Go to Store
3 Prices from 3 Stores | $214.99-$378.35
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?

Reasons For

Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW GE FCM7SKWW
4 Reasons For
57% Higher Freezer Net Capacity
Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW is 453L capacity. That's 255L higher than the GE FCM7SKWW (198L).

This is the total usable (net) capacity of the freezer, measured in litres.

A higher capacity means that more food can be stored in the freezer at a time.

Read more Read less | Edit
$3,513 Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
Over five years the Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW is $3,513 cheaper to run than the GE FCM7SKWW.
Read more Read less
More Popular
The Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW is a more popular choice amongst buyers.
Better Brand
Frigidaire freezers have an average rating of 89.1%, however GE has an average rating of 62.2%.
1 Reason For
$304 Cheaper
The GE FCM7SKWW costs $214.99, whereas the Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW is $519.00.

Reviews & Awards

Awards

Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW GE FCM7SKWW
1 Award
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW GE FCM7SKWW
Best
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
No reviews found

Average User Rating

Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW GE FCM7SKWW
Best
5 stars
96 reviews
4 stars
40 reviews
3 stars
2 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
3 reviews
No reviews found

Average Brand Rating

Frigidaire has a better average brand rating than GE. The average brand rating for Frigidaire is 89.14% based on 56 reviews, where as the average brand rating for GE is 62.2% based on 8 reviews.
Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW GE FCM7SKWW
Frigidaire

89

89

Based on 56 reviews
GE

62

62

Based on 8 reviews

Date Released

Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW GE FCM7SKWW
39 months old 11 months old Best

Key Features

Freezer Net Capacity

This is the total usable (net) capacity of the freezer, measured in litres.

A higher capacity means that more food can be stored in the freezer at a time.

Width

Height

Depth

Energy Efficiency

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Freezer running costs calculated based on an average of 24 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the freezer and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving freezers.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these freezers for 10 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW
Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
129 trees 5.0 tonnes CO2 (Best)
GE FCM7SKWW
GE
FCM7SKWW
655 trees 26 tonnes CO2

Specification

 
 
 
Performance Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW GE FCM7SKWW
Freezer Net Capacity 453L
BEST
198L
Minimum Freezer Temperature -23°C Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Freezer Temperature 10°C Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Design Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW GE FCM7SKWW
Certification
 
 
 
Power Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW GE FCM7SKWW
Typical Power Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data 250W
Annual Energy Consumption 431kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Current 15A Unknown - Click to provide data
Connected Load 0.6W Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions Frigidaire FFFH17F2QW GE FCM7SKWW
Width 863.6mm 946.15mm
Height 1,524mm 850.9mm
Depth 711.2mm 539.75mm
Weight 83.9kg 34kg
BEST
Package Weight
Package Height 1,730mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth 787mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width 889mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Similar Comparisons

Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
$519.00
Better brand
Vastly higher freezer net capacity
VS
Gorenje
FI5092AW
$520.65
65% cheaper to
run
Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
$519.00
Better brand
Significantly higher freezer net capacity
VS
Gorenje
FI4091
$513.88
$5 Cheaper
Better user
reviews
55% cheaper to
run
Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
$519.00
Better brand
Hugely higher freezer net capacity
VS
Gorenje
F6152AX
$612.13
55% cheaper to
run
Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
$519.00
Hugely higher freezer net capacity
VS
Siemens
GI18DA30
$615.52
65% cheaper to
run
Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
$519.00
Better brand
Higher freezer net capacity
VS
AEG
ABB68811LS
$649.04
54% cheaper to
run
Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
$519.00
Better brand
79% higher freezer net capacity
VS
AEG
ABB68821LS
$694.35
$524 cheaper to
run over five
years
Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
$519.00
Better brand
Significantly higher freezer net capacity
VS
AEG
AHB92231
$695.48
$591.07 cheaper
to run
Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
$519.00
Better brand
373L higher freezer net capacity
VS
AEG
ATB81011
$720.40
56% cheaper to
run
Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
$519.00
Better brand
47% higher freezer net capacity
VS
Gorenje
FN6192PW
$730.72
$371 cheaper to
run over five
years
Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
$519.00
More popular
VS
Frigidaire
FFVU17F4QW
$764.99
Cheaper to run
by $216.15
Frigidaire
FFFH17F2QW
$519.00
Better brand
Higher freezer net capacity
VS
AEG
AHB72221
$790.63
$480.12 cheaper
to run
GE
FCM7SKWW
$214.99
85% higher freezer net capacity
VS
Zanussi
ZFX31401WA
$232.66
$3,965.37
cheaper to run
GE
FCM7SKWW
$214.99
VS
Gorenje
FI4061
$371.57
$3,708.68
cheaper to run
GE
FCM7SKWW
$214.99
VS
Zanussi
ZBF11421
$510.49
91% cheaper to
run
GE
FCM7SKWW
$214.99
Higher freezer net capacity
VS
Gorenje
FI4091
$513.88
Cheaper to run
by $4,059 over
five years
Better brand
GE
FCM7SKWW
$214.99
Vastly higher freezer net capacity
VS
Gorenje
FI5092AW
$520.65
93% cheaper to
run over five
years
Better brand