Some Sony SLT-A65 reviewers mentioned that it was able to produce good images. Expert website Asia.cnet.com said in their Sony SLT-A65 review “Need the baddest digital SLR around? Even though we've long ago dispelled the megapixel myth, there are some photographers who abide by the mantra that bigger is better”.
A number of Sony SLT-A65 owners wrote in their reviews that the product had a good image sensor. Expert review site Goodgearguide.com.au mentioned “Its huge sensor gives you versati”. Maclife.com rated the product as very good and wrote five years ago “It has the same 24.3 million effective pixel sensor, making it the joint highest resolution APS-C format camera available” in their review of the Sony SLT-A65. Expert website Amateurphotographer.co.uk mentioned in their Sony SLT-A65 review “Comes equipped with the excellent 24.3-million-pixel sensor found in the Alpha 77”.
Some Sony SLT-A65 reviewers concluded that this digital camera had a good picture resolution. Expert review site Pcmag.com wrote in their Sony SLT-A65 review “The 24-megapixel Sony Alpha 65 is capable of shooting at a blazing fast 9 frames per second.”. Six years ago expert review site Tipa.com wrote “The Sony Alpha SLT-65’s Translucent Mirror Technology enables 10 frames-per-second shooting at full resolution and Live View with phase detection focusing capability, available in all modes includ” in their review.
One person said in their reviews that it was good in low light. Five years ago expert review site Buy-N-Shoot.com said “Combine this with good lowlight ca” in their Sony SLT-A65 review.