Twelve owners considered that it was able to produce good images. Ephotozine wrote two years ago “Incredibly detailed images at low ISOs”. Ephotozine.com said on expert website Ephotozine “The camera produces much better JPEG images than previous versions of the camera.”. Pcmag.com wrote in their review of the Sigma DP3 Quattro on expert review site PC Mag “The Sigma dp3 Quattro can capture incredibly sharp macro photos.”.
Three owners wrote in their reviews that it had a good ISO range. Two years ago Ephotozine wrote “Excellent piqu 100 ISO” but they only gave it a score of 1 stars. Ephotozine also said “Up to ISO 400” in their review. Pcmag.com wrote in their review of this digital camera “So why even think about buying it? Quite simply, because at low ISO i” and gave it a score of 6 stars.
Two customers mentioned in their reviews that it had a good image sensor. In April last year Amazon.co.uk wrote “Foveon Sensor” in their review of the Sigma DP3 Quattro but despite that they rated it 1 stars. Digitalversus.com mentioned on expert review site Digital Versus “An APS-C sensor with Foveon technology, capable of producing 39 Mpx photos”.
Two customers who purchased it concluded that it was good in terms of colour rendition. Matt wrote in his review of this digital camera on Bhphotovideo.com two years ago “A Fuji XT1 (my previous favorite color rendition camera)a Nikon D800 E with a Nikon 105mm macro lens” and gave it a rating of 7 stars.
One person who reviewed it reckoned that it had a good picture resolution. Ephotozine mentioned “4fps continuous shooting”.