Thirteen customers agreed that the Pentax K-x was able to produce good images. Dcresource.com said seven years ago “Very good photo quality, with good high ISO performance” in their review of this digital camera but in spite of that they scored it 1 stars. Dcresource.com also mentioned “Sensorshift image stabilization” in their review. Photographyblog.com said “Great image and video quality” in their review of this digital camera yet they only scored this digital camera 1 stars.
Nine customers mentioned in their reviews that the product had a good picture resolution. Eight years ago V3.co.uk said “HD video shooting” but in spite of that they rated the product 20 out of 100. Seven years ago Dpexpert.com.au said “Continuous shooting mode is up to n” yet they only gave the Pentax K-x a rating of 14 out of 100. In the same month Macworld.co.uk said “1 280 x 720 pixels HD video” although they scored the product 1 stars.
Five people who reviewed the Pentax K-x thought it was good in low light. Dp Review mentioned on DP Review “Class-leading image quality in low light, very good retention of fine detail at high ISOs”. About.com mentioned “Excellent image quality in low light conditions”. Pc Mag said in their review of this digital camera seven years ago “Impressive low-light performance” but despite that they only gave it a rating of 18.8 out of 100.
Two people who reviewed this digital camera concluded that it had a good ISO range. Dp Review said on DP Review “Good detail and color in JPEGs at base ISO” in their review of this digital camera but in spite of that they only gave the product a score of 19.4 out of 100. Macworld.co.uk wrote “ISO range expandable to ISO 12800 (otherwise ISO 6400” in their review of this digital camera but even so they scored it 1 stars.
One person who reviewed this digital camera reckoned that it had a good image sensor. Seven years ago Dcresource.com wrote “It features a 12.4 Megapixel CMOS sensor” in their Pentax K-x review.