Thirty-five owners wrote in their reviews that it was able to produce good images. Cnet.co.uk scored it 80 out of 100 and mentioned “Good picture quality”. It Reviews.com mentioned “Excellent image quality” in their review of this digital camera. Six years ago Cnet.com.au mentioned “Good image quality, very similar to the G 2”.
Two customers who purchased the product agreed that it had a good picture resolution. Expert website Ephotozine.com gave it a score of the highest possible rating of 5 stars and wrote in their review of this digital camera “High speed focusing, fast continuous shooting”. Mr. D Field said in their review of this digital camera on Amazon.co.uk “Video As seems to be the norm with any camera right now, by the click of a button the camera becomes a video camera shooting VERY good 1080p video”.
Two customers said in their reviews that the product had a good ISO range. Nutwoodwanderer mentioned “Trying to achieve the same by adjusting the aperture wasn't as effective and the ISO settings only made bit of a difference” in their review of this digital camera.
Two customers who reviewed this digital camera agreed that it was good in low light. Nutwoodwanderer wrote on Amazon.co.uk “In the shop, this seemed to perform effortlessly in low light” but even so they only scored the Panasonic LUMIX GF3K 40 out of 100.
One owner who bought it considered that it had a good image sensor. Dpexpert.com.au mentioned in their review of this digital camera “It has a 12 megapixel sensor and comes with a 14–42mm lens (28–84mm film equivalent”.