Twenty-nine people mentioned in their reviews that the product was able to produce good images. Five years ago Hardwarezone.com.sg mentioned “Increased image detail over 1” in their review of this digital camera and gave it a rating of 80 out of 100. Also five years ago Techradar.com said on expert website Techradar “While it does produce good images, those looking for something a little more advanced will probably be more at home with”. Randallm said on Walmart.com three years ago “The picture quality is amazing! I typically shoot P” in their review of this digital camera.
Fifteen owners who purchased it concluded that it had a good picture resolution. Cnet.com.au wrote on CNET.com.au five years ago “Super-fast continuous shooting performance”. Cnet.co.uk mentioned on CNET.co.uk “High frame rate shooting” in their review of the Nikon V2 + 1 NIKKOR VR 10-30mm. Three years ago Camerastuffreview.com mentioned on Camerastuffreviewcom “The sensor has a higher resolution with 14 megapixels” but in spite of that they only gave it a score of 3 stars out of 5.
Three customers who reviewed the product thought it had a good image sensor. Expert review site Photoreview.com.au said four years ago “Nikon.)A new 14.2-megapixel (effective) sensor replaces the 10.1-megapixel chip in the V1, although the chip size remains relatively small, compar” . K. L. Dove wrote on Amazon.co.uk “OK, so it has a physically small sensor”.
Two customers who reviewed this digital camera considered that it had a good ISO range. Digital-Photography-School.com mentioned “Gute Bildqualitt bis ISO 800 bei guten Lichtbedingungen”. Capt Joe mentioned “At ISO 1600 results were excellent” in their review of this digital camera and scored this digital camera the highest possible rating of 5 stars.
One person who reviewed it concluded that it was good in low light.