Thirty-one owners concluded that this digital camera was able to produce good images. Techradar.com mentioned on Techradar five years ago “While it does produce good images, those looking for something a little more advanced will probably be more at home with” in their review of this digital camera. Ukstevens mentioned on Amazon in the same month “My first results with it are very pleasing with no issues at all on picture quality”. An anonymous author mentioned “The VR on the 70-200 is so good that I have been able to get good, sharp images hand-held at 1/200” and rated it 4 stars out of 5.
Eight customers who bought this digital camera wrote that it had a good picture resolution. Expert review site Camerastuffreviewcom wrote in their review of this digital camera “The sensor has a higher resolution with 14 megapixels” but they only gave the Nikon V2 a rating of 65 out of 100. Wileec said on Amazon “More pixels, to be sure.”. Mrc said in their review of this digital camera “Continous shooting is also fast”.
Three people who bought this digital camera agreed that it had a good image sensor. Three years ago K. L. Dove said “OK, so it has a physically small sensor”.
Two people mentioned in their reviews that it had a good ISO range. Wileec wrote “I had hoped they would have improved the ISO performance some and addressed the limitations imposed when the FT-1 is attached” but despite that they only gave the product a score of 3 stars out of 5. Capt Joe gave this digital camera a rating of the highest possible rating of 5 stars and said on Walmart.com “At ISO 1600 results were excellent”.
One person mentioned that it was good at handing highlights and shadows in pictures. An anonymous author wrote four years ago “4) The dynamic range obviously falls far short of my D7000 and D800 so highlights are very easy to clip with the V2”.