Twenty-five customers who bought it agreed that it was able to produce good images. Newegg.com wrote three years ago “Large, crisp, impressive image” . Five years ago expert website Cnet.co.uk mentioned in their review of the Canon SX500 IS “So long as you don't want to enlarge your images hugely or crop the”. Also five years ago expert website Dpexpert.com.au wrote “The lens is image stabilised, which it needs to”.
Fourteen people who reviewed it said that it had a good picture resolution. Three years ago Newegg.com mentioned “Resolution 1920 x 1080” in their review of this digital camera. Newegg.com also said “I have tried multiple different ways of checking for dead pixels and so far have been unable to spot a single one” in their review. Newegg.com also wrote “The monitor itself is great Good resolution, never had any issues with display, very unobtrusive” in their review.
Three people who reviewed this digital camera agreed that it was good in low light. Itproportal.com wrote four years ago “Low, light AF performance” in their review of this digital camera. Toptenreviews.com said in their review of this digital camera “The camera works well in even low-light situations” and gave it a score of 6 stars. Itproportal.com also said “It offers a useful zoom range with very effective image stabilisation, excellent low-light focusing” in their review.
Two owners who reviewed it mentioned that it was able to produce clear pictures. Amazon.co.uk said in their review of this digital camera two years ago “I had no dead pixels and with a few tweaks using the basic Windows calibration, I'm extremely satisfied with the colors and clarity”.
One person said in their reviews that this digital camera had a good image sensor. Ephotozine.com wrote in their review of this digital camera on Ephotozine “A 16 megapixel sensor, intelligent”.