Three owners who reviewed it reckoned that it was well made. Cnet.com.au wrote six years ago “Highquality build and materials used” in their Canon 115 HS review. Pc Mag wrote “Small, compact build”. Four years ago Newegg.com wrote “Seems very well built”.
Three owners thought the product was good at resisting water ingress. Jimjam wrote on Amazon.co.uk “Also has inexpensive waterproof case (Â£30) available for swimming” in their review of this digital camera and scored it 7 stars. Peter Nightingale said “Had my original stolen on the beach, great little camera that has very good waterproof housing available” and scored this digital camera 9 stars.
One customer who reviewed it thought it was strong and durable. Four years ago Newegg.com said “Long sturdy cord that does not need ground pin”.
One person considered that this digital camera was easy to damage or scratch. Terry Fodor mentioned in his review of this digital camera on Amazon.co.uk “They lie it was not rivised its misinformd, slow delivery, item packed very poorly it damaged, box”.
One person said that it was reliable. Mrs. S. Jones said on Amazon.co.uk five years ago “Would recommend this to anyone who wants a small, reliable camera that can be carried about with ease” and gave the product a rating of 7 stars.