Close
Share on
Cisco Flip UltraHD
Cisco Flip UltraHD
+ 10 Videos

Loading image...

Cisco Flip UltraHD Camcorder

Five industry awards
Not good in terms of size
No optical zoom
56 Reviews + 5 Awards
Lanoc.org Recommended futurelooks.com Recommended PC Advisor.co.uk Recommended Expert Reviews Best Buy

Available from international sellers only

Tell Me When It Becomes Available See International Prices
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe

Reviews

Five Industry Awards

This camcorder is one of the most awarded by experts of all the comparable spec camcorders that were launched more than a year ago.

This Cisco camcorder was given a "Recommended" award by review websites Futurelooks.com, PC Advisor.co.uk and Lanoc.org all of whom concluded that this camcorder was good.

Furthermore, review site Expert Reviews gave this camcorder a "Best Buy" award and wrote it was good and website Laptopmag.com gave it an "Editor's Choice" award and wrote it was brilliant.

Read more Less

Average Expert Reviews

This Cisco camcorder has an average expert rating of 75 out of 100 based on thirty-three expert reviews from sites including CNET.com, Trusted Reviews, Expert Reviews and Techradar.


Design

Good Looking Video Under Most Circumstances

Three customers who bought it agreed that it was smooth. Expert review site Gadgetshow.channel5.com said “The Flip UltraHD is an easy to hold, easy to use camcorder that shoots 720p video onto the onboard flash memory at a smooth 30 frames per second” but despite that they gave it a rating of 60 out of 100. Goodgearguide.com.au said on expert review site Good Gear Guide.com.au “The Flip UltraHD records smooth 720p video” in their review of this camcorder.

Three customers wrote in their reviews that the Cisco Flip UltraHD was good looking. Eight years ago Mac World wrote in his review of this camcorder “Good looking video under most circumstances” and gave the product a score of the highest possible rating of 5 stars. In the same month expert review site Technologytell.com mentioned “I was pretty thrilled as anyone who knows me knows that I am a huge jazz fan”. Pocket-Lint.com mentioned on expert review site Pocket Lint “In terms of design it is pretty m”.

Two customers mentioned in their reviews that the product was well designed. Pc Mag mentioned on PC Mag “Design simples”. Expert review site Igizmo.co.uk said “Top quality, tiny design” in their review of this camcorder and rated it 80 out of 100.

Read more Less

The Flip UltraHD Offers 8GB of Storage Built In, Providing 2 Hours Worth of Hi-Res Footage

One owner who purchased it thought it was well made. Gadgetshow.channel5.com mentioned eight years ago “The Flip UltraHD offers 8GB of storage built in, providing 2 hours worth of hi-res footage” in their review of this camcorder.

One owner who reviewed this camcorder thought it was strong and durable. Expert review site Techworld.com mentioned in their review of the Cisco Flip UltraHD “Robust FlipVideo Flip UltraHD camcorder fits easily into a pocket”.

Read more Less

Easy to Use

Seventeen people who reviewed this camcorder wrote that it was easy to use. Electricpig.co.uk said eight years ago “Still the easiest camcorder to use” in their review of this camcorder but even so they only rated the product 60 out of 100. Thetechzone.com wrote “Very easy to use”. Expert review site Consumerelectronicsnet.com said “When I first reviewed the Pure Digital Flip camera back in 2007, I liked the camera for its ease of use, video quality”.

Two owners concluded that the Cisco Flip UltraHD had a good interface. The-Gadgeteer.com mentioned “Easy user interface” . One owner who bought it wrote that it was easy to setup. Pc Mag said on PC Mag “Easy to set up VPN”.

One owner said in their reviews that the product was easy to use the menus. Camcorderinfo.com said “Its lack of manual controls, menus, or special settings make it a very simple product to use”.

Read more Less

Excellent Quality

Fifteen customers who purchased the Cisco Flip UltraHD considered that it was good quality. Thetechzone.com said “Generally impressive audio quality” in their review of this camcorder. Eight years ago Pocket Lint said in their review of this camcorder “Screen, video quality, battery options”. Thetechzone.com also wrote “Good video quality under most conditions” in their review.


Audio

Acceptable Noise Level

One person considered that the product was noisy. Futurelooks.com said “Loud speaker” .

Loud Speaker

One person considered that the product was noisy. Futurelooks.com said “Loud speaker” .


Weight & Dimensions

Relatively Bulky

Five people who reviewed the product concluded that it was heavy and bulky. Eight years ago Pocket Lint said “Bulky, no cables supplied, prone to wobble” in their review of this camcorder. Electricpig.co.uk wrote in their review of this camcorder “Chunky, doesn't compare well with its rivals” and gave it a rating of 3 stars out of 5. Pc Mag wrote “Relatively bulky” .

Read more Less

Not Good in Terms of Size

Five people who reviewed the product concluded that it was heavy and bulky. Eight years ago Pocket Lint said “Bulky, no cables supplied, prone to wobble” in their review of this camcorder. Electricpig.co.uk wrote in their review of this camcorder “Chunky, doesn't compare well with its rivals” and gave it a rating of 3 stars out of 5. Pc Mag wrote “Relatively bulky” .

One customer mentioned that this camcorder was not a good size. Expert website Computeractive.co.uk wrote “It's a trade-off between the easier-to-use buttons of the Ultra HD and the smaller dimensions (and slightly higher price) of the older Mino HD” .

Read more Less

Sharp Screen

Eight people wrote in their reviews that this camcorder had a good screen. Pc Mag wrote “Sharp screen” however despite that they rated it 3 stars out of 5. Gadgetshow.channel5.com wrote “A larger 2-inch screen so you can see what you're filming for once” in their review of this camcorder. Mac World wrote “Bright 2-inch display” in his review of this camcorder.

No Optical Zoom

Four customers mentioned in their reviews that this camcorder did not have a good zoom. Eight years ago Macworld.co.uk said “1.5x digital zoom” in their review of this camcorder. Mac World said in his Cisco Flip UltraHD review “Digital zoom unimpressive”.

One customer who bought it thought it did not have a good lens. The-Gadgeteer.com mentioned eight years ago “Lacks protection for the lens when not being used”. One owner who reviewed it reckoned that it did not have a good image stabiliser. Mac World mentioned eight years ago “No image stabilization” in his review of this camcorder.

One person who reviewed it wrote that it did not have a good autofocus. Gadgetshow.channel5.com said eight years ago “With auto focus”.

Read more Less

Power

Removable Battery

Seven owners mentioned in their reviews that it had a good battery life. Futurelooks.com scored it 4 stars out of 5 and said “Uses rechargeable AA battery pack” in their review of this camcorder. Mac World gave the product a rating of the highest possible rating of 5 stars and he mentioned “Removable battery” in his review of this camcorder. Expert website Pocket-Lint.com mentioned “Great quality, simple to use and flexible power options make the Flip Ultra HD worthy of considerationKey specsAA battery, HDMI”.


Features

FlipShare Software Needs More Features

Four customers concluded that the product did not have good features. Thetechzone.com said in their review of this camcorder “FlipShare software needs more features” but even so they still scored it 4 stars out of 5. Pcmag.com wrote in their Cisco Flip UltraHD review on expert review site PC Mag “It falls short of being a great business-class router because of limited features and incre” but in spite of that they still scored it 70 out of 100. Expertreviews.co.uk mentioned on Expert Reviews “The reason? Because despite their lack of features and their tiny image sensor, they were supremely easy to use, fun”.


Support

Total Lack of Manual Controls

Three customers reckoned that the Cisco Flip UltraHD did not have good technical guidance. Eight years ago Thetechzone.com mentioned in their review of this camcorder “Total lack of manual controls” nonetheless they still rated it 4 stars out of 5. Futurelooks.com wrote in the same month “No optical zoom or any manual controls”.


Smart TV

Emailing of Clips

One owner said in their reviews that the product did not have email functionality. Pc Mag said “Emailing of clips” in their review of this camcorder.


Other

Released Over a Year Ago

This video camera was released in April 2017.

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers cisco u260whc1
Barcodes 00745883591848

Other Camcorders to Consider

Sony HDR-MV1 vs Cisco Flip UltraHD

Sony HDR-MV1 vs Cisco Flip UltraHD
Sony HDR-MV1 Cisco Flip UltraHD
$ 298.00 $0.00
One Month Newer
Feedback