It looks like you are browsing from
Go to Close
TVs & Displays
Photography & Video
Cooking Appliances
White Goods
Household
Technology
Home Blenders 5 Best Blenders Under $1,000 in the US - August 2019

5 Best Blenders Under $1,000 in the US - August 2019

Updated 21 June 2019 by Matthew
Share on


5 best blenders under $1,000

Which Are the Best Blenders Under $1,000?

Don't have time to read our analysis of the best blenders under $1,000? No problem, let's cut to the chase, the best blenders under $1,000 are:

  • 1) Ninja BL492 -
  • 2) AEG SB 9300 -
  • 3) Cuisinart SPB10CH - $78.99 Overstock
  • 4) Braun MQ735 - $59.99 eBay
  • 5) Russell Hobbs 22700 - $96.89 eBay

What Blender Under $1,000 to Buy in July 2019?

Below we provide a detailed run through of the top 5 blenders under $1,000 currently for sale in the United States:

Best Buy
Ninja BL492 AEG SB 9300 Cuisinart SPB10CH Braun MQ735 Russell Hobbs 22700
Ninja BL492 AEG SB 9300 Cuisinart SPB10CH Braun MQ735 Russell Hobbs 22700
Buy Now
Buy Now
Buy Now
Buy Now
$78.99 Buy Now
Overstock
Buy Now
$59.99 Buy Now
eBay
Buy Now
$96.89 Buy Now
eBay
Buy Now
1.13L
BOWL CAPACITY
1,200W
$131
OVER 10 YEARS
2.2L
BOWL CAPACITY
1,190W
4
SPEED LEVELS
$130
OVER 10 YEARS
1.5L
BOWL CAPACITY
600W
7
SPEED LEVELS
0.5L
BOWL CAPACITY
750W
1.3L
BOWL CAPACITY
800W
1
SPEED LEVEL
97
Reviews
260 Reviews
82
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Running Costs
$130 Over 10 Years
78
Kagoo Score
Very Good
97
Reviews
12 Reviews
83
Features
Fully-Featured
69
Value for Money
Good
77
Running Costs
$130 Over 10 Years
79
Kagoo Score
Very Good
94
Reviews
1 Review + 1 Award
85
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Popularity
Quite Popular
83
Value for Money
Very Good
83
Kagoo Score
Excellent
87
Brand Rating
Excellent Brand
83
Features
Fully-Featured
78
Value for Money
Very Good
79
Kagoo Score
Very Good
94
Reviews
19 Reviews
82
Features
Fully-Featured
74
Value for Money
Good
87
Running Costs
$87 Over 10 Years
80
Kagoo Score
Excellent
A positively reviewed and fully featured 1.13L bowl capacity, 1,200W blender, with low running costs. Our review analysis indicates that this blender is. A giant bowl capacity and classic 1,190W tabletop blender, with a very good spec and low running costs. Our review analysis indicates that this blender it. It's an award winning and fully featured 1.5L bowl capacity, 600W blender, with a good price. A fully featured and classic 0.5L bowl capacity, 750W blender, with a cheap price. Our review analysis indicates that this blender is. It's a very economical to run and classic 1.3L bowl capacity, 800W blender, with a reasonable price and a very good spec.
1 Reason For
Better Overall Reviews
3 Reasons For
44% Bigger Bowl Capacity
Ice Crushing Function
Better Overall Reviews
7 Reasons For
Pulse Function
Six More Speed Levels
Ice Crushing Function
Dishwasher-Proof Parts
Better Kagoo Score
More Shops Are Selling it
One More Award
6 Reasons For
Whisk
Chopper
Dishwasher-Proof Parts
$19 Cheaper
User Reviews Are Slightly Better
Better Brand
4 Reasons For
Ice Crushing Function
Dishwasher-Proof Parts
33% Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
Has a Wider Variety of Uses
8 Reasons Against
49% Smaller Bowl Capacity
Worse Kagoo Score
Not Currently Available
Older by One Month
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by $44
User Review Rating is Worse
Worse Brand
Has a Narrower Variety of Uses
7 Reasons Against
Three Less Speed Levels
Worse Kagoo Score
Not Currently Available
Older by Over One Year
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by $43
User Review Rating is a Bit Worse
Worse Brand
3 Reasons Against
Smaller Bowl Capacity
More Expensive by $19
Worse Brand
4 Reasons Against
1.7L Smaller Bowl Capacity
Worse Kagoo Score
Not As Many Stockists
Over Four Years Older
9 Reasons Against
0.9L Smaller Bowl Capacity
Only One Speed Level
Worse Kagoo Score
$37 More Expensive
Less Retailers
One Year Older
A Lot Lower User Review Score
Lower Overall Review Score
Worse Brand
 Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted  Compare  Shortlisted
Full Details
Full Details
Full Details
Full Details
Full Details

Ninja BL492

Ninja BL492

Buy Now
Ninja BL492
1.13L
BOWL CAPACITY
1,200W
$131
OVER 10 YEARS

The Ninja BL492 has a Kagoo Score of 78. With a price tag of $0.00 this blender is good value for money. For further details check out our full review of the Ninja BL492 or read our article on whether you should buy a Ninja blender.

A positively reviewed and fully featured 1.13L bowl capacity, 1,200W blender, with low running costs. Our review analysis indicates that this blender is.

97
Reviews
260 Reviews
82
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Running Costs
$130 Over 10 Years
78
Kagoo Score
Very Good

Owners report that Ninja BL492 has brilliant user reviews with an average user rating of 93%, based on 260 reviews.

1 Reason For for Choosing the Ninja BL492

Better Overall Reviews

Based on 260 reviews, the Ninja BL492 has an average review score of 93%, whereas the Cuisinart SPB10CH has an average rating of 81% (based on 1 review) and the Russell Hobbs 22700 has an average rating of 88% (based on 19 reviews).

8 Reasons Against for Choosing the Ninja BL492

49% Smaller Bowl Capacity

The Ninja BL492 is a 1.13L bowl capacity blender. That's 1.07L smaller than the AEG SB 9300 (2.2L), 0.63L bigger than the Braun MQ735 (0.5L) and 0.17L smaller than the Cuisinart SPB10CH and the Russell Hobbs 22700 (1.3L). More ...

'Bowl Capacity' denotes the capacity of the main bowl of the blender, measured in litres (L).

A larger capacity bowl fitted to your blender means that a larger amount of ingredients can be processed and mixed at once, meaning the appliance is more efficient and can be used for larger cookery tasks.

Worse Kagoo Score

The Ninja BL492 has received a Kagoo Score of 78, whereas the AEG SB 9300 scored 79, the Braun MQ735 scored 79, the Cuisinart SPB10CH scored 83 and the Russell Hobbs 22700 scored 80.

Not Currently Available

We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. More ...

You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by One Month

The Ninja BL492 is one month older than the Cuisinart SPB10CH.

Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by $44

Over five years the running costs of the Ninja BL492 are $131 which is $1 more than the AEG SB 9300 and $44 more than the Russell Hobbs 22700. Show assumptions.

User Review Rating is Worse

The average user rating of the Ninja BL492 is 93%, whereas the average user rating of the AEG SB 9300 is 97% (based on 12 reviews) and the Braun MQ735 is 100% (based on 2 reviews).

Worse Brand

Ninja blenders have an average rating of only 84.6%, but Braun has an average rating of 87.6%.

Has a Narrower Variety of Uses

Comparing the product reviews on average people thought the Ninja BL492 has a narrower variety of uses.

AEG SB 9300

AEG SB 9300

Buy Now
AEG SB 9300
2.2L
BOWL CAPACITY
1,190W
4
SPEED LEVELS
$130
OVER 10 YEARS

The AEG SB 9300 has a Kagoo Score of 79. With a price tag of $0.00 this blender is good value for money. For further details check out our full review of the AEG SB 9300.

Features We Love:
Big bowl capacity (2.2L)
Four speed levels
Has an ice crushing function
Has a turbo mode
Fairly big power (1,190W)

A giant bowl capacity and classic 1,190W tabletop blender, with a very good spec and low running costs.

97
Reviews
12 Reviews
83
Features
Fully-Featured
69
Value for Money
Good
77
Running Costs
$130 Over 10 Years
79
Kagoo Score
Very Good

Multiple reviews mentioned that AEG SB 9300 has fantastic user reviews with an average user rating of 97%, based on 12 reviews.

AEG GourmetPro SB9300 Hochleistungsstandmixer | Testsieger
AEG GourmetPro SB9300 Hochleistungsstandmixer | Testsieger

3 Reasons For for Choosing the AEG SB 9300

44% Bigger Bowl Capacity

The AEG SB 9300 is a 2.2L bowl capacity blender. That's 1.7L bigger than the Braun MQ735 (0.5L) and 0.9L bigger than the Cuisinart SPB10CH, the Ninja BL492 and the Russell Hobbs 22700 (1.3L). More ...

'Bowl Capacity' denotes the capacity of the main bowl of the blender, measured in litres (L).

A larger capacity bowl fitted to your blender means that a larger amount of ingredients can be processed and mixed at once, meaning the appliance is more efficient and can be used for larger cookery tasks.

Ice Crushing Function

The AEG SB 9300 has an ice crushing function (as do the Cuisinart SPB10CH and the Russell Hobbs 22700), however the Braun MQ735 and the Ninja BL492 do not have this feature. More ...

'Ice Crushing Function' denotes whether the blender has a function specifically for crushing ice.

An ice-crushing function on your blender is an excellent thing to have in summer, or when making up cocktails!

Better Overall Reviews

The AEG SB 9300 has an average overall review score of 93% based on 12 reviews, however the Cuisinart SPB10CH has an average rating of 81% (based on 1 review) and the Russell Hobbs 22700 has an average rating of 88% (based on 19 reviews).

7 Reasons Against for Choosing the AEG SB 9300

Three Less Speed Levels

The AEG SB 9300 has four speed levels, however the Cuisinart SPB10CH only has seven speed levels. More ...

We do not know the number of speed levels on the Braun MQ735 or the Ninja BL492. It is possible that they do not have any speed levels.

'Speed Levels' is the number of speeds the blender is capable of mixing at.

More speeds on your blender mean that is it more versatile, and can handle ingredients that require slow, gentle mixing as well as those that require fast, vigorous blending.

Worse Kagoo Score

The AEG SB 9300 has received a Kagoo Score of 79, however the Cuisinart SPB10CH scored 83 and the Russell Hobbs 22700 scored 80.

Not Currently Available

We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. More ...

You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by Over One Year

The AEG SB 9300 is 16 months older than the Cuisinart SPB10CH, 15 months older than the Ninja BL492 and four months older than the Russell Hobbs 22700.

Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by $43

The running costs over five years of the AEG SB 9300 are $130 which is $43 more than the Russell Hobbs 22700. Show assumptions.

User Review Rating is a Bit Worse

The AEG SB 9300's average user score is 97%, however the Braun MQ735's is 100% (based on 2 reviews).

Worse Brand

AEG blenders have an average rating of only 77%, whereas Braun has an average rating of 87.6%, Ninja has an average rating of 84.6% and Russell Hobbs has an average rating of 77.6%.

Cuisinart SPB10CH

$78.99
Overstock

Cuisinart SPB10CH

Buy Now
Cuisinart SPB10CH
1.5L
BOWL CAPACITY
600W
7
SPEED LEVELS

The Cuisinart SPB10CH has a Kagoo Score of 83. However with a price tag of $78.99 this blender is a bit expensive. For further details check out our full review of the Cuisinart SPB10CH.

Features We Love:
Has a pulse function
Seven speed levels
Has an ice crushing function
Has a dishwasher-proof parts
Has a variable speed

Our review analysis indicates that this blender it. It's an award winning and fully featured 1.5L bowl capacity, 600W blender, with a good price.

94
Reviews
1 Review + 1 Award
85
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Popularity
Quite Popular
83
Value for Money
Very Good
83
Kagoo Score
Excellent

Multiple reviews mentioned that Cuisinart SPB10CH has brilliant expert reviews with an average expert rating of 100%.

Howstuffworks.com Best Buy

7 Reasons For for Choosing the Cuisinart SPB10CH

Pulse Function

The Cuisinart SPB10CH has a pulse function, whereas the AEG SB 9300, the Braun MQ735, the Ninja BL492 and the Russell Hobbs 22700 do not have this feature. More ...

A 'pulse' function is one that turns the blender on repeatedly for very short intervals. It helps to reduce ingredients effectively without over-mixing them.

A pulse function is extremely helpful for reducing soup and finishing off mixing tasks.

Six More Speed Levels

The number of speed levels on the Cuisinart SPB10CH is seven, but the AEG SB 9300 only has four speed levels and the Russell Hobbs 22700 only has one speed level. More ...

We do not know the number of speed levels on the Braun MQ735 or the Ninja BL492. It is possible that they do not have any speed levels.

'Speed Levels' is the number of speeds the blender is capable of mixing at.

More speeds on your blender mean that is it more versatile, and can handle ingredients that require slow, gentle mixing as well as those that require fast, vigorous blending.

Ice Crushing Function

The Cuisinart SPB10CH has an ice crushing function (as do the AEG SB 9300 and the Russell Hobbs 22700), but the Braun MQ735 and the Ninja BL492 do not have this feature. More ...

'Ice Crushing Function' denotes whether the blender has a function specifically for crushing ice.

An ice-crushing function on your blender is an excellent thing to have in summer, or when making up cocktails!

Dishwasher-Proof Parts

The Cuisinart SPB10CH has a dishwasher-proof parts, and so do the Braun MQ735 and the Russell Hobbs 22700, but the AEG SB 9300 and the Ninja BL492 do not. More ...

'Dishwasher-proof parts' denotes whether the blender has attachments and parts that are safe to clean using a dishwasher.

Dishwasher-proof parts make cleaning the appliance post-cooking far easier.

Better Kagoo Score

The Cuisinart SPB10CH has received a Kagoo Score of 83, but the AEG SB 9300 scored 79, the Braun MQ735 scored 79, the Ninja BL492 scored 78 and the Russell Hobbs 22700 scored 80.

More Shops Are Selling it

A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this blender.

One More Award

The Cuisinart SPB10CH has received 1 award from an expert review site, however the AEG SB 9300 has received no awards, the Braun MQ735 has received no awards, the Ninja BL492 has received no awards and the Russell Hobbs 22700 has received no awards.

3 Reasons Against for Choosing the Cuisinart SPB10CH

Smaller Bowl Capacity

The Cuisinart SPB10CH is a 1.5L bowl capacity blender. That's 0.7L smaller than the AEG SB 9300 (2.2L), 1L bigger than the Braun MQ735 (0.5L) and 0.2L bigger than the Ninja BL492 and the Russell Hobbs 22700 (1.3L). More ...

'Bowl Capacity' denotes the capacity of the main bowl of the blender, measured in litres (L).

A larger capacity bowl fitted to your blender means that a larger amount of ingredients can be processed and mixed at once, meaning the appliance is more efficient and can be used for larger cookery tasks.

More Expensive by $19

The Cuisinart SPB10CH is $19 more expensive than the Braun MQ735.

Worse Brand

Cuisinart blenders have an average rating of only 66%, however AEG has an average rating of 77%, Braun has an average rating of 87.6%, Ninja has an average rating of 84.6% and Russell Hobbs has an average rating of 77.6%.

The cheapest price that we found for the SPB10CH in the United States is $78.99 but in total we found only 2 prices for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
loading image
3 Year Warranty
$78.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$100.00
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | $78.99 - $100.00
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices

Braun MQ735

$59.99
eBay

Braun MQ735

Buy Now
Braun MQ735
0.5L
BOWL CAPACITY
750W

The Braun MQ735 has a Kagoo Score of 79. With a price tag of $59.99 this blender is fair value for money. For further details check out our full review of the Braun MQ735 or read our article on whether you should buy a Braun blender.

Features We Love:
Has a dishwasher-proof parts
Has a turbo mode
Has a whisk
Has a chopper
Has a detachable shaft

A fully featured and classic 0.5L bowl capacity, 750W blender, with a cheap price.

83
Features
Fully-Featured
78
Value for Money
Very Good
79
Kagoo Score
Very Good

Purchasers report that Braun MQ735 has superb user reviews with an average user rating of 100%.

Braun Multiquick 7 MQ735 Sauce Hand Blender Detailed Unboxing And Demonstration!
Braun Multiquick 7 MQ735 Sauce Hand Blender Detailed Unboxing And Demonstration!
?????????? ???????? Braun MQ735 Sauce / Unboxing Braun MQ735 Sauce
?????????? ???????? Braun MQ735 Sauce / Unboxing Braun MQ735 Sauce

6 Reasons For for Choosing the Braun MQ735

Whisk

The Braun MQ735 has a whisk, but the AEG SB 9300, the Cuisinart SPB10CH, the Ninja BL492 and the Russell Hobbs 22700 do not have this feature. More ...

'Whisk' denotes whether the blender comes with a whisk included.

Whisks are helpful for quickly and efficiently whisking up cream, eggs, and in all manner of baking.

Chopper

The Braun MQ735 has a chopper, however the AEG SB 9300, the Cuisinart SPB10CH, the Ninja BL492 and the Russell Hobbs 22700 do not. More ...

Whether the blender comes with a chopper unit, which is used for chopping herbs and veg.

Chopper units are helpful for chopping fresh herbs and leaves, meaning a more efficient chop, and less mess as well.

Dishwasher-Proof Parts

The Braun MQ735 has a dishwasher-proof parts (as do the Cuisinart SPB10CH and the Russell Hobbs 22700), but the AEG SB 9300 and the Ninja BL492 do not have this feature. More ...

'Dishwasher-proof parts' denotes whether the blender has attachments and parts that are safe to clean using a dishwasher.

Dishwasher-proof parts make cleaning the appliance post-cooking far easier.

$19 Cheaper

The Braun MQ735 costs $59.99, whereas the Cuisinart SPB10CH is $78.99 and the Russell Hobbs 22700 is $96.89.

User Reviews Are Slightly Better

The average user review score of the Braun MQ735 is 100% based on 2 reviews, but the average rating of the AEG SB 9300 is 97% (based on 12 reviews), the average rating of the Ninja BL492 is 93% (based on 260 reviews) and the average rating of the Russell Hobbs 22700 is 88% (based on 19 reviews).

Better Brand

Braun blenders have an average rating of 87.6%, however AEG only has an average rating of 77%, Cuisinart only has an average rating of 66%, Ninja only has an average rating of 84.6% and Russell Hobbs only has an average rating of 77.6%.

4 Reasons Against for Choosing the Braun MQ735

1.7L Smaller Bowl Capacity

The Braun MQ735 has a bowl capacity of 0.5L, however the AEG SB 9300 is a 2.2L bowl capacity blender (1.7L bigger) and the Cuisinart SPB10CH, the Ninja BL492 and the Russell Hobbs 22700 are all 1.3L bowl capacity blenders (0.8L bigger). More ...

'Bowl Capacity' denotes the capacity of the main bowl of the blender, measured in litres (L).

A larger capacity bowl fitted to your blender means that a larger amount of ingredients can be processed and mixed at once, meaning the appliance is more efficient and can be used for larger cookery tasks.

Worse Kagoo Score

The Braun MQ735 has received a Kagoo Score of 79, but the Cuisinart SPB10CH scored 83 and the Russell Hobbs 22700 scored 80.

Not As Many Stockists

Only 1 retailer sell the Braun MQ735, however 2 stores sell the Cuisinart SPB10CH. More ...

Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this blender remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Over Four Years Older

The Braun MQ735 is older than the AEG SB 9300 by three years, older than the Cuisinart SPB10CH by five years, older than the Ninja BL492 by four years and older than the Russell Hobbs 22700 by four years.

The cheapest price that we found for the MQ735 in the United States is $59.99 but in total we found only 1 price for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$59.99
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$83.62
Standard delivery: $15.00
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$111.25
Standard delivery: $28.69
Go to Store
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$160.00
Standard delivery: $20.00
Go to Store
4 Prices from 1 Store | $59.99 - $160.00
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices

Russell Hobbs 22700

$96.89
eBay

Russell Hobbs 22700

Buy Now
Russell Hobbs 22700
1.3L
BOWL CAPACITY
800W
1
SPEED LEVEL
$87
OVER 10 YEARS

The Russell Hobbs 22700 has a Kagoo Score of 80. However with a price tag of $96.89 this blender is a bit expensive. For further details check out our full review of the Russell Hobbs 22700 or read our article on whether you should buy a Russell Hobbs blender.

Features We Love:
Has an ice crushing function
Has a dishwasher-proof parts
Has a safety switch

Our review analysis indicates that this blender is. It's a very economical to run and classic 1.3L bowl capacity, 800W blender, with a reasonable price and a very good spec.

94
Reviews
19 Reviews
82
Features
Fully-Featured
74
Value for Money
Good
87
Running Costs
$87 Over 10 Years
80
Kagoo Score
Excellent

Multiple reviews mentioned that Russell Hobbs 22700 has very good user reviews with an average user rating of 88%, based on 19 reviews.

4 Reasons For for Choosing the Russell Hobbs 22700

Ice Crushing Function

The Russell Hobbs 22700 has an ice crushing function, and so do the AEG SB 9300 and the Cuisinart SPB10CH, however the Braun MQ735 and the Ninja BL492 do not. More ...

'Ice Crushing Function' denotes whether the blender has a function specifically for crushing ice.

An ice-crushing function on your blender is an excellent thing to have in summer, or when making up cocktails!

Dishwasher-Proof Parts

The Russell Hobbs 22700 has a dishwasher-proof parts (as do the Braun MQ735 and the Cuisinart SPB10CH), however the AEG SB 9300 and the Ninja BL492 do not have this feature. More ...

'Dishwasher-proof parts' denotes whether the blender has attachments and parts that are safe to clean using a dishwasher.

Dishwasher-proof parts make cleaning the appliance post-cooking far easier.

33% Cheaper to Run Over Five Years

The Russell Hobbs 22700 only costs $87 to run over five years but the AEG SB 9300 costs $130 to run (49% more) and the Ninja BL492 costs $131 to run (50% more). More ...

Has a Wider Variety of Uses

The Russell Hobbs 22700 reviewers thought the Russell Hobbs 22700 has a wider variety of uses. Several people thought that it was great for making juice and great for making smoothies.

9 Reasons Against for Choosing the Russell Hobbs 22700

0.9L Smaller Bowl Capacity

The Russell Hobbs 22700 has a bowl capacity of 1.3L, whereas the AEG SB 9300 is a 2.2L bowl capacity blender (0.9L bigger), the Braun MQ735 is a 0.5L bowl capacity blender (0.8L smaller) and the Cuisinart SPB10CH and the Ninja BL492 are both 1.13L bowl capacity blenders (0.17L smaller). More ...

'Bowl Capacity' denotes the capacity of the main bowl of the blender, measured in litres (L).

A larger capacity bowl fitted to your blender means that a larger amount of ingredients can be processed and mixed at once, meaning the appliance is more efficient and can be used for larger cookery tasks.

Only One Speed Level

The Russell Hobbs 22700 has one speed level, however the AEG SB 9300 only has four speed levels and the Cuisinart SPB10CH only has seven speed levels. More ...

We do not know the number of speed levels on the Braun MQ735 or the Ninja BL492. It is possible that they do not have any speed levels.

'Speed Levels' is the number of speeds the blender is capable of mixing at.

More speeds on your blender mean that is it more versatile, and can handle ingredients that require slow, gentle mixing as well as those that require fast, vigorous blending.

Worse Kagoo Score

The Russell Hobbs 22700 has received a Kagoo Score of 80, however the Cuisinart SPB10CH scored 83.

$37 More Expensive

The Russell Hobbs 22700 is more expensive than the Braun MQ735 by $37 and more expensive than the Cuisinart SPB10CH by $18.

Less Retailers

Only 1 shop sell the Russell Hobbs 22700, whereas 2 shops sell the Cuisinart SPB10CH. More ...

Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this blender and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
One Year Older

The Russell Hobbs 22700 is older than the Cuisinart SPB10CH by one year and older than the Ninja BL492 by 11 months.

A Lot Lower User Review Score

The Russell Hobbs 22700's average user rating is 88%, however the AEG SB 9300's is 97% (based on 12 reviews), the Braun MQ735's is 100% (based on 2 reviews) and the Ninja BL492's is 93% (based on 260 reviews).

Lower Overall Review Score

The Russell Hobbs 22700's average overall rating is 88%, however the AEG SB 9300's is 93% (based on 12 reviews) and the Ninja BL492's is 93% (based on 260 reviews).

Worse Brand

Russell Hobbs blenders have an average rating of only 77.6%, whereas Braun has an average rating of 87.6% and Ninja has an average rating of 84.6%.

The cheapest price that we found for the 22700 in the United States is $96.89 but in total we found only 1 price for it.

Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
loading image
eBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
$96.89
Standard delivery: $33.30
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | $96.89
Show All Prices Show Fewer Prices
Share on
Compare All Blenders
Find the best blender for you by checking our complete list of over 226 blenders.
In This Guide
5 Best Blenders Under $1,000 in the US - August 2019
Ninja BL492
Reasons For
Reasons Against
AEG SB 9300
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Cuisinart SPB10CH
Awards
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices
Braun MQ735
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices
Russell Hobbs 22700
Reasons For
Reasons Against
Best Prices

×