LG 65UH615 vs Sony XBR-65X750

(8)
LG 65UH615
Sony XBR-65X750

Top Prices

Target
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
BrandsMart USA
In stock
Best Buy
In stock
Adorama
Out of stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
Walmart
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
Significantly lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 65UH615 has an annual energy consumption of 107kWhkWh, whereas the Sony XBR-65X750 is a 184kWhkWh annual energy consumption TV (77kWh higher). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Thinner Edit
The LG 65UH615 has a thickness of 58.5mmmm. That's 21.5mm thinner than the Sony XBR-65X750 (80mmmm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Cheaper by $98
The LG 65UH615 is $98.01 cheaper than the Sony XBR-65X750.
4 Reasons For
Three USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the Sony XBR-65X750 is three, but the LG 65UH615 only has one USB 2.0 port. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Sony XBR-65X750 is a four HDMI port TV, whereas the LG 65UH615 only has three HDMI ports. Read more

The HDMI ports quantity is the number of ports that the TV has that will accept a HDMI cable. HDMI is the most common type of cable used to connect modern TVs, DVD players, games consoles etc.

A greater number of HDMI ports will allow you to permanently connect more devices to the TV and will reduce the need to reach around the back of the TV to unplug and plug in cables when switching between devices.

26% lighter Edit
Sony XBR-65X750 is 21.5kgg heavy. That's 5.5g lighter than the LG 65UH615 (21.5kgg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Available from 6 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Two less USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the LG 65UH615 is one, but the Sony XBR-65X750 only has three USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

Only three HDMI ports Edit
The LG 65UH615 is a three HDMI port TV, whereas the Sony XBR-65X750 only has four HDMI ports. Read more

The HDMI ports quantity is the number of ports that the TV has that will accept a HDMI cable. HDMI is the most common type of cable used to connect modern TVs, DVD players, games consoles etc.

A greater number of HDMI ports will allow you to permanently connect more devices to the TV and will reduce the need to reach around the back of the TV to unplug and plug in cables when switching between devices.

Heavier Edit
LG 65UH615 is 27kgg heavy, but the Sony XBR-65X750 is a 21.5kgg heavy TV (5.5g lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Fewer sellers
The LG 65UH615 is only stocked by 1 seller, but the Sony XBR-65X750 is stocked by 7 stores. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Older by five months
The LG 65UH615 is five months older than the Sony XBR-65X750.
3 Reasons Against
42% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Sony XBR-65X750 is a 184kWhkWh annual energy consumption TV. That's 77kWh higher than the LG 65UH615 (184kWhkWh). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

A lot thicker Edit
The Sony XBR-65X750 has a thickness of 80mmmm, however the LG 65UH615 is a 58.5mmmm thick TV (21.5mm thinner). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

$98 more expensive
The Sony XBR-65X750 is more expensive than the LG 65UH615 by $98.01.

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

9 months Ago 4 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
65" 65"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
LED Backlighting
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 120Hz
Motion Interpolation Technology
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
Video Mode
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
BEST
Screen Format Adjustment
 4:3
 Zoom
 4:3
 Zoom
Picture Mastering Index (PMI)
1,200 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Diagonal
164cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Vertical Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Display Technology
 LED
 LED
BEST

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
TV Band
 DTV
 DTV

Smart TV

Operating System Version
3.0 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating System
 Web OS
 Web OS

Audio

RMS Rated Power
20W 20W
Loudspeaker
2 2
Sound Mode
 Standard
 Music
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 Music
 Sports
 Game
Audio Decoder
 Dolby Digital
 Dolby Digital
Audio Decoding Technology
 DTS-HD
 Dolby Pulse
 Dolby Digital Plus
 DTS-HD
 Dolby Pulse
 Dolby Digital Plus

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
1 1
Ethernet LAN Port
1 1
RF Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
RS-232 Port
1 1
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
1 1
Composite Video in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Component Video in Port
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
1 3
BEST
HDMI Version
 2.0
BEST
 2.0
HDMI Port
3 4
BEST
Consumer Electronics Control
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version
1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data

Networking

WiFi Standard
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
BEST
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n

Management Features

Smart Mode
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Custom
 Graphics
 Theater
 Animation
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Custom
 Graphics
 Theater
 Animation
Programming Period
8 day(s) Unknown - Click to provide data

Performance

Processor Core
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
Stored Teletext Page
2,000 pages Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interface
 300 x 300
 300 x 300

Power

Typical Power Consumption
73W 193W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A++
BEST
 A++
Annual Energy Consumption
107kWh
BEST
184kWh
AC Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
58.5mm
BEST
80mm
Weight
27kg 21.5kg
BEST
Package Weight
32.7kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight (with Stand)
27.4kg 22.7kg
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
263mm
BEST
294.9mm
Height (with Stand)
902mm 900.9mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
1,460mm
BEST
1,463.04mm
Height
846mm
BEST
851.9mm
Width
1,460mm
BEST
1,463.04mm
Packaging Height
923mm
BEST
971mm
Packaging Depth
BEST
228mm
Packaging Width
1,548mm
BEST
1,587mm

Packaging Content

Remote Control Type
Unknown - Click to provide data RMT-TX200U
Cable Included
 AC
 AC

Technical Details

RF Input
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Stand Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 662.9mm
Feedback