LG 49LF6300 vs LG 49UH6100 vs Philips 50PFL4901

(13)
LG 49LF6300
LG 49UH6100
Philips 50PFL4901

Top Prices

Appliances Connection
In stock
Walmart
Delivery unknown
In stock
Rakuten USA
Delivery unknown
B&H Photo
In stock
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
Big Deal Ga
Delivery unknown
BrandsMart USA
In stock

Reasons For

1 Reason For
Three USB 2.0 ports Edit
The LG 49LF6300 is a three USB 2.0 port TV, whereas the Philips 50PFL4901 only has one USB 2.0 port. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

2 Reasons For
Lighter Edit
LG 49UH6100 is 11.7kgg heavy, but the LG 49LF6300 is a 14.4kgg heavy TV (2.7g heavier) and the Philips 50PFL4901 is a 12.2kgg heavy TV (0.5g heavier). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

12 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this TV remaining in stock.
2 Reasons For
Larger screen size Edit
The Philips 50PFL4901 is a 50"" TV. That's 1.5" larger than the LG 49LF6300 (50"") and 1" larger than the LG 49UH6100 (50""). Read more

The display diagonal of a TV is the most common measure of screen size and is the distance from the top left to the bottom right of the visible part of a TV screen excluding any frame or border. One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

$146 cheaper
The Philips 50PFL4901 costs $349.88, whereas the LG 49LF6300 is $699.00 and the LG 49UH6100 is $495.97.

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The LG 49LF6300 is a 48.5"" TV. That's 0.5" smaller than the LG 49UH6100 (50"") and 1.5" smaller than the Philips 50PFL4901 (50""). Read more

The display diagonal of a TV is the most common measure of screen size and is the distance from the top left to the bottom right of the visible part of a TV screen excluding any frame or border. One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

2.7g heavier Edit
The LG 49LF6300 is a 14.4kgg heavy TV. That's 2.7g heavier than the LG 49UH6100 (12.2kgg) and 2.2g heavier than the Philips 50PFL4901 (12.2kgg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

$349 more expensive
The LG 49LF6300 is more expensive than the LG 49UH6100 by $203.03 and more expensive than the Philips 50PFL4901 by $349.12.
Less retailers
Only 5 shops sells the LG 49LF6300, whereas 13 retailers sell the LG 49UH6100. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Five months older
The LG 49LF6300 is older than the LG 49UH6100 by four months and older than the Philips 50PFL4901 by five months.
4 Reasons Against
1" smaller screen size Edit
The LG 49UH6100 has a screen size of 49"", but the LG 49LF6300 is a 48.5"" TV (0.5" smaller) and the Philips 50PFL4901 is a 50"" TV (1" larger). Read more

The display diagonal of a TV is the most common measure of screen size and is the distance from the top left to the bottom right of the visible part of a TV screen excluding any frame or border. One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

Two less USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the LG 49UH6100 is one (as does the Philips 50PFL4901), but the LG 49LF6300 only has three USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

More expensive by $146
The LG 49UH6100 is $146.09 more expensive than the Philips 50PFL4901.
Older by one month
The LG 49UH6100 is one month older than the Philips 50PFL4901.
3 Reasons Against
Only one USB 2.0 port Edit
The Philips 50PFL4901 has one USB 2.0 port, and so does the LG 49UH6100, however the LG 49LF6300 only has three USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

5% heavier Edit
The Philips 50PFL4901 has a weight of 12.2kgg. That's 2.2g lighter than the LG 49LF6300 (12.2kgg) and 0.5g heavier than the LG 49UH6100 (12.2kgg). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Not as many stockists
Only 1 store sell the Philips 50PFL4901, however 5 shops sell the LG 49LF6300 and 13 retailers sell the LG 49UH6100. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

12 months Ago 8 months Ago 7 months Ago

Display

Screen Size
48.5" 49" 50"
BEST
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
LED Backlighting
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
Typical Contrast Ratio
 5000:1
 5000:1
 5000:1
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Motion Interpolation Frequency
120Hz Unknown - Click to provide data 120Hz
Motion Interpolation Technology
 TruMotion
 TruMotion
 TruMotion
Response Time
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 8.5ms
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
BEST
Video Mode
 1080i
 1080p
 2160p
 720i
 720p
 480i
 480p
 1080i
 1080p
 2160p
 720i
 720p
 480i
 480p
BEST
 1080i
 1080p
 2160p
 720i
 720p
 480i
 480p
Screen Format Adjustment
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 Zoom
Display Refresh Rate
 120 Hz
 120 Hz
BEST
 120 Hz
Display Diagonal
123.2cm Unknown - Click to provide data 127cm
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1400 x 1050 (SXGA+)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1360 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 720 x 480
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1400 x 1050 (SXGA+)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1360 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 720 x 480
 640 x 480 (VGA)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1400 x 1050 (SXGA+)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1360 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 720 x 480
 640 x 480 (VGA)
Vertical Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 178°

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 ASTC
 ASTC
 ASTC
Tuner
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog
TV Band
 UHF
 VHF
 UHF
 VHF
 UHF
 VHF
Analog Signal Format System
 NTSC
 NTSC
 NTSC

Smart TV

Video App
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix
Music App
 Pandora
 Pandora
 Pandora
Operating System Version
2.0 3.0 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating System
 Web OS
 Web OS
 Web OS

Audio

Audio System
Virtual Surround Plus Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Equaliser Band
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
RMS Rated Power
20W 20W 20W
Loudspeaker
2 2 2
Dolby Technology
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
Audio Decoder
 Dolby Digital
 Dolby Digital
 Dolby Digital
Audio Decoding Technology
 Dolby Digital DTS
 DTS-HD
 Dolby Digital Plus
 Dolby Digital DTS
 DTS-HD
 Dolby Digital Plus
 Dolby Digital DTS
 DTS-HD
 Dolby Digital Plus

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Ethernet LAN Port
1 1 1
RF Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
RS-232 Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
1 1 1
Composite Video in Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video in Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
3
BEST
1 1
HDMI Port
3 3 3
Consumer Electronics Control
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
VGA Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
RF Connector Type
 F
 C
 IEC
 F, IEC
 F
 C
 IEC
 F, IEC
 F
 C
 IEC
 F, IEC

Networking

WiFi Standard
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
 802.11n
 802.11g
 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11g
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
 802.11n
 802.11g
 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11g
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11ac
 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11a
 IEEE 802.11ac
 802.11n
 802.11g
 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11b
 IEEE 802.11g
 IEEE 802.11n
BEST

Management Features

Playback Mode
 Slideshow
 Slideshow
 Slideshow
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 4 Unknown - Click to provide data

Performance

Video Format
 DIVX
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 MPEG4
 H.264
 AVC
 H.265
 ASP
 DIVX
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 MPEG4
 H.264
 AVC
 H.265
 ASP
 DIVX
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 MPEG4
 H.264
 AVC
 H.265
 ASP
Audio Format
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 RA-Lossless
 apt-X
 AAC HE
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 RA-Lossless
 apt-X
 AAC HE
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 AAC++
 RA-Lossless
 apt-X
 AAC HE
Image Format
 JPEG XR
 MPO
 JPS
 JPG
 JPEG XR
 MPO
 JPS
 JPG
 JPEG XR
 MPO
 JPS
 JPG

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interface
 300 x 300
 300 x 300
 300 x 300

Power

Typical Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 145W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
75kWh Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
 50

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
55.88mm 69.5mm
BEST
Weight
14.4kg 11.7kg
BEST
12.2kg
Package Weight
21kg 15.2kg
BEST
19kg
Weight (with Stand)
17.6kg 12kg
BEST
14.5kg
Depth (with Stand)
221mm 217.9mm
BEST
271.8mm
Height (with Stand)
698.5mm
BEST
707mm 718.8mm
Width (with Stand)
1,105mm
BEST
1,108mm 1,135.4mm
Height
647.7mm
BEST
657mm 675.6mm
Width
1,105mm
BEST
1,108mm 1,135.4mm
Packaging Height
759.5mm
BEST
775mm 787.4mm
Packaging Depth
BEST
BEST
208.3mm
Packaging Width
1,196mm
BEST
1,197mm 1,318.4mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 AC
 AC
 AC

Operational Conditions

Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 40

Technical Details

Dolby Technology
 Dolby Digital DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
 Dolby Digital DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
 Dolby Digital DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS

Other Features

Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 31.97lbs
Power
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 145W
Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 44.7 x 4.5 x 26.6
Feedback