Sony KD-65X8509 vs Sony KDL-65W859

Sony KD-65X8509
Sony KDL-65W859

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

1 Reason For
999Hz faster motion interpolation frequency Edit
The Sony KD-65X8509 has a motion interpolation frequency of 1,000Hz, whereas the Sony KDL-65W859 is only a 1,000HzHz motion interpolation frequency TV (999Hz slower). Read more

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source. Motion interpolation technology can sometimes create some unwanted side effects such glitches when the technology suddenly activates during an action scene. Most modern TVs will have an option to switch off the motion interpolation if it is not desired.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

4 Reasons For
36kWh lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Sony KDL-65W859 has an annual energy consumption of 171kWhkWh, whereas the Sony KD-65X8509 is a 207kWh annual energy consumption TV (36kWh higher). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

One thousand and twenty-nine times lighter Edit
Sony KDL-65W859 is 23.4kgg heavy, but the Sony KD-65X8509 is a 24.1kg heavy TV (24.1kg heavier). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Cheaper to run by $31.55
Over five years the Sony KDL-65W859 only costs $153.12 to run however the Sony KD-65X8509 costs $184.67 to run (21% more). Read more
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Sony KDL-65W859 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", whereas the Sony KD-65X8509 has a rating of "A".

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Sony KD-65X8509 has an annual energy consumption of 207kWh, but the Sony KDL-65W859 is a 171kWhkWh annual energy consumption TV (36kWh lower). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Vastly heavier Edit
The Sony KD-65X8509 has a weight of 24.1kg, however the Sony KDL-65W859 is a 23.4kgg heavy TV (24.1kg lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Higher running costs over five years by $31.55
The running costs of the Sony KD-65X8509 are $184.67 which is $31.55 more than the Sony KDL-65W859 over five years. Show assumptions.
Inferior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Sony KD-65X8509 is "A", but the rating of the Sony KDL-65W859 is "A+".
1 Reason Against
Nine hundred and ninety-nine times slower motion interpolation frequency Edit
The Sony KDL-65W859 has a motion interpolation frequency of 1,000HzHz, however the Sony KD-65X8509 is a 1,000Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (999Hz faster). Read more

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source. Motion interpolation technology can sometimes create some unwanted side effects such glitches when the technology suddenly activates during an action scene. Most modern TVs will have an option to switch off the motion interpolation if it is not desired.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Awards

1 Award
flatpanelshd.com: Highly Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

21 months Ago 21 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 182.34
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 184.67
Electricity cost - switched on $ 150.79
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 153.12

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

1.2T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 1.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
31
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.99T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.99 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
25
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
65"
BEST
65"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
3D Type
 Active
 Active
LED Backlighting
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Motion Interpolation Frequency
1,000Hz
BEST
1,000Hz
Motion Interpolation Technology
 Motionflow
 Motionflow
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
BEST
Screen Format Adjustment
 16:9
 14:9
 Zoom
 16:9
 14:9
 Zoom
Display Diagonal
164cm
BEST
163.9cm
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
BEST
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 3840 x 2160
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
BEST
Display Technology
 LED
 LED

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
Tuner
 Analog
 Analog

Smart TV

Operating System Version
5.0 5.0
Operating System
 Android
 Android

Audio

Audio System
Unknown - Click to provide data NICAM/A2
RMS Rated Power
20W 20W
BEST
Loudspeaker
2 2
Dolby Technology
 Pulse
 Digital Plus
 Digital
 Pulse
 Digital Plus
 Digital
Sound Mode
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
Audio Decoder
 Dolby Digital
 Dolby Digital
Audio Decoding Technology
 Dolby Pulse
 Dolby Digital Plus
 Dolby Pulse
 Dolby Digital Plus

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
1 1
Ethernet LAN Port
1 1
RF Port
1 1
SCART Port
1 1
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
1 1
Composite Video in Port
1 1
Component Video in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
3 3
HDMI Port
4 4
MHL Version
 2.0
 2.0
BEST
Composite Video Out Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Management Features

Smart Mode
 Custom
 Graphics
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Animation
 Custom
 Graphics
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Animation
On Screen Display Language
 DAN
 DUT
 GRE
 EST
 SLV
 BUL
 HEB
 CZE
 NOR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 LIT
 ITA
 POL
 POR
 SLK
 ESP
 SWE
 HUN
 RUM
 SRP
 KAZ
 CAT
 LAT
 LAV
 UKR
 TUR
 CRO
 DAN
 DUT
 GRE
 EST
 SLV
 BUL
 HEB
 CZE
 NOR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 LIT
 ITA
 POL
 POR
 SLK
 ESP
 SWE
 HUN
 RUM
 SRP
 KAZ
 CAT
 LAT
 LAV
 UKR
 TUR
 CRO

Performance

Video Format
 H.265
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 3GP
 MOV
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 MKV
 XVID
 WEBM
 3GPP
 H.265
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 3GP
 MOV
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 MKV
 XVID
 WEBM
 3GPP
Audio Format
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
Image Format
 JPG
 RAW
 MPO
 JPG
 RAW
 MPO
Stored Teletext Page
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,000 pages

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black
Peak Luminance Ratio
72% Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interface
 400 x 300
 400 x 300

Power

Typical Power Consumption
149W 123W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W
BEST
0.5W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
207kWh 171kWh
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
288W Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
78mm
BEST
78mm
Weight
24.1kg 23.4kg
BEST
Weight (with Stand)
25.5kg 24.5kg
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
265mm
BEST
265mm
Height (with Stand)
892mm 891mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
1,453mm 1,455mm
BEST
Height
844mm 843mm
BEST
Width
1,453mm 1,455mm
BEST
Packaging Height
943mm
BEST
943mm
Packaging Depth
224mm
BEST
224mm
Packaging Width
1,553mm 1,553mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Battery Type
R03 Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Included
 AC
 AC
Feedback