Samsung UN65J6300 vs Sony XBR-65X850

Samsung UN65J6300
Sony XBR-65X850

Top Prices

Appliances Connection
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
BrandsMart USA
In stock
Best Buy
In stock
Walmart
Delivery unknown
In stock
Electronic Express
Delivery unknown
In stock (10 available)
Adorama
Delivery unknown
In stock
onecall
Delivery unknown
In stock, only 2 left!

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
Thinner Edit
Samsung UN65J6300 is 71.12mmmm thick. That's 6.88mm thinner than the Sony XBR-65X850 (78mmmm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Cheaper by $79
The Samsung UN65J6300 costs $79 less than the Sony XBR-65X850.
3 Reasons For
One more composite video in port Edit
The Sony XBR-65X850 has two composite video in ports, however the Samsung UN65J6300 only has one composite video in port. Read more

A composite video port is mainly used for connecting older devices to the TV, such as older video cameras or video recorders. Composite video connections can only display images up to a resolutionsof 640 x 480 pixels so the quality of image displayed via a composite video connection will be quite low.

Multiple composite video ports will allow you to connect more than one older video device. However it is very unlikely that you will use the composite video port at all.

1.4g lighter Edit
The Sony XBR-65X850 has a weight of 24.1kgg, however the Samsung UN65J6300 is a 25.5kgg heavy TV (1.4g heavier). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

10 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
One less composite video in port Edit
The Samsung UN65J6300 is a one composite video in port TV, whereas the Sony XBR-65X850 only has two composite video in ports. Read more

A composite video port is mainly used for connecting older devices to the TV, such as older video cameras or video recorders. Composite video connections can only display images up to a resolutionsof 640 x 480 pixels so the quality of image displayed via a composite video connection will be quite low.

Multiple composite video ports will allow you to connect more than one older video device. However it is very unlikely that you will use the composite video port at all.

A little heavier Edit
The Samsung UN65J6300 is a 25.5kgg heavy TV, whereas the Sony XBR-65X850 is a 24.1kgg heavy TV (1.4g lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

Less retailers
The Samsung UN65J6300 is only stocked by 1 retailer, whereas the Sony XBR-65X850 is stocked by 11 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock.
3 Reasons Against
9% thicker Edit
The Sony XBR-65X850 is a 78mmmm thick TV. That's 6.88mm thicker than the Samsung UN65J6300 (78mmmm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

More expensive by $79
The Sony XBR-65X850 is $79 more expensive than the Samsung UN65J6300.
Older by eight months
The Sony XBR-65X850 is eight months older than the Samsung UN65J6300.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

13 months Ago 21 months Ago

Display

Screen Size
64.5" 64.5"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
3D Type
 Active
 Active
LED Backlighting
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Motion Interpolation Frequency
120Hz 120Hz
Motion Interpolation Technology
 CMR (Clear Motion Rate)
 CMR (Clear Motion Rate)
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Video Mode
 1080i
 1080p
 2160p
 720p
 480i
 480p
 1080i
 1080p
 2160p
 720p
 480i
 480p
BEST
Screen Format Adjustment
 16:9
 16:9
Display Diagonal
163.8cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Vertical Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 ATSC
 ATSC
Tuner
 Digital
 Digital
Analog Signal Format System
 ATSC
 ATSC

Smart TV

Operating System
 Android
 Android

Audio

RMS Rated Power
20W 20W
Loudspeaker
2 2
Dolby Technology
 DTS Premium Sound 5.1
 DTS Studio Sound
 Dolby MS11
 DTS
 DTS Premium Sound 5.1
 DTS Studio Sound
 Dolby MS11
 DTS
Sound Mode
 Standard
 Music
 Sports
 Standard
 Music
 Sports
Audio Decoder
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTS
Audio Decoding Technology
 DTS Premium Sound 5.1
 DTS Studio Sound
 Dolby MS11
 Dolby Digital Plus
 Dolby Digital Pulse
 DTS Premium Sound 5.1
 DTS Studio Sound
 Dolby MS11
 Dolby Digital Plus
 Dolby Digital Pulse

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Ethernet LAN Port
1 1
RF Port
1 1
RS-232 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Composite Video in Port
1 2
BEST
Component Video in Port
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
3 3
HDMI Port
4 4
Consumer Electronics Control
 Anynet+
 Anynet+
MHL Version
 3.0
 3.0
BEST
Audio Out Port
1 1
Composite Video Out Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Management Features

On Screen Display Language
 ENG
 FRE
 ESP
 ENG
 FRE
 ESP
OSD Language
3 Unknown - Click to provide data

Performance

Processor Core
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
Picture Processing Technology
 Samsung Wide Color Enhancer
 Samsung Wide Color Enhancer

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interface
 400 x 400
 400 x 400

Power

Typical Power Consumption
65W 261W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.4W
BEST
0.5W
AC Input Voltage
 110 - 120
 110 - 120
AC Input Frequency
 60
 60
Maximum Power Consumption
213W Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Thickness
71.12mm
BEST
78mm
Weight
25.5kg 24.1kg
BEST
Package Weight
34.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight (with Stand)
27.6kg 25.5kg
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
368.3mm 265mm
BEST
Height (with Stand)
909.3mm 892mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
1,455mm 1,452.88mm
BEST
Height
835.7mm 844mm
Width
1,455mm 1,452.88mm
Packaging Height
952.5mm 943mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
BEST
224mm
Packaging Width
1,783mm 1,553mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 HDMI
 AC
 HDMI
 AC
Feedback