Close

Loading image...
Coby MID8065
+ 1 Video

Coby MID8065 Cortex-A9 1.2GHz 8GB 8" Tablet

Cortex-A9 1.2GHz Android 8GB Feb 2013
Processor Model Processor Clock Speed Operating System Internal Storage Capacity Release Date
- 8.0 Inch LCD capacitive multi-touchscreen 16:9 (XGA 1024 x 768).- Dual-Core 1.2 GHz processor.- 1GB of RAM for seamless multi-tasking.- Browse the web, watch Youtubevideos, check e-mail, and... More
Available from international sellers only
Tell Me When It Becomes Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

2 Reasons For

Good Size

One Coby MID8065 reviewer reckoned that the product was a good weight. Madshrimps.be said in their review of this tablet “Reasonable size and weight” .

1024 X 768 Pixels Display Resolution

The MID8065 has a maximum display resolution of 1024 x 768 pixels. That's 28% more display resolution than the most frequently found display resolution of 1024 x 600 pixels. Across all tablet computers of a comparable age and spec to the MID8065 the best display resolution is 1280 x 800 pixels and the worst is 800 x 480 pixels.

Chart Edit

6 Reasons Against

Poor Expert Reviews

Three experts from sites including PC Mag, computershopper.com and IT Reviews.com have rated this A9 processor tablet on average 57 out of 100. If all the tablet computers of a comparable type and age are ranked by average expert review score then this tablet is in the bottom 25%.

Poor Battery Life

One Coby MID8065 owner wrote in their reviews that the Coby MID8065 did not have a good battery life. Three years ago Madshrimps.be mentioned “Disappointing battery life” in their review of this tablet.

Inferior Picture Quality

One person thought this tablet did not have good picture quality. Expert review site Computershopper.com mentioned in their review “Poor graphics should give you pause when better models are not dramatically pricier” .

Not 4G Compatible

Most tablet computers that have been on the market for a comparable time to the MID8065 are not 4G compatible. The MID8065 is no exception to this as it too is not 4G compatible.

Chart Edit

Not 3G Compatible

The MID8065 is not 3G compatible, although it is worth noting that most of the other A9 processor tablet computers that have been available for more than two years are also not 3G compatible.

Chart Edit

Quite Slow Processor Clock Speed

With a processor clock speed of only 1.2 gigahertz, the MID8065 has a quite slow processor clock speed compared to most of the other A9 processor tablet computers that have been around for a similar time to the MID8065. Across all the A9 processor tablet computers that were released more than two years ago the processor clock speeds range from 1GHz to 1.8GHz, and the average processor clock speed is 1.4GHz.

Chart Edit

4 Other reasons to consider the Coby MID8065

Released Over Three Years Ago

This tablet computer has been on the market for over three years.

Average Screen Size

The MID8065 has a pretty average screen size (8 inches) compared to most of the other A9 processor tablet computers that have been on the market for a comparable time to the MID8065.

Chart Edit

Two Processor Cores

The number of processor cores on the Coby MID8065 is two which is average compared to the other 66 A9 processor tablet computers that have been on the market for a comparable time to the MID8065 that we have assessed the number of processor cores of.

Chart Edit

Average Internal Storage Capacity

At 8 gigabytes, the Coby MID8065 has a relatively typical internal storage capacity compared to most of the other A9 processor tablet computers that have been around for around the same time as the MID8065.

Chart Edit

Specification

Processor
Processor Model
Processor Clock Speed
Processor Core
Processor Architecture
Memory
Maximum Internal Memory
Internal Memory
Software
Operating System
Operating System Version
Platform
Storage
Internal Storage Capacity
Maximum Memory Card Size
Memory Card
Storage Medium
Integrated Card Reader
Storage Medium
Display
Screen Size
Aspect Ratio
Touch Screen Technology
Multi-Touch Technology
Touch Sensitive Screen
LED Backlight
Display Resolution
Camera
Front Camera
Built-In Camera
Audio
Built-In Microphone
Built-In Speaker
Networking
3G Compatible
WiFi Standard
Bluetooth
Wi-Fi Standard
Ports & Interfaces
DC-In Jack
Microphone Input
Headphone Output
HDMI Port
USB 2.0 Port
Performance
Mac Operating System
Windows Operating System
Gyroscope
Accelerometer
GPS
Linux Operating System
Design
Form Factor
Colour
Battery
Battery
Weight & Dimensions
Weight
Height
Thickness
Width
Packaging Content
Cable Included
AC Adapter
Bag Included
Other Features
Docking Connector
Kids Tablet
WiFi
Operating System

Expert Reviews

(5)
1 July 2013

After working for about three weeks with the MID8065, we could see a lot of benefits over the previously reviewed MID1045; there are, of course, some downsides. The benefits include a way speedier...

Lots of inputs
Reasonable size and weight
Google-certified, with Google apps and Play support
Inexpensive
Mini HDMI and microSD
Display lacks brightness and clarity of competitors
Noticeable screen air gap causes lots of glare, reduced contrast
Graphics performance is subpar for gaming
Low-quality display
Dated Android 4.0 OS

The Coby MID8065 aims for the budget tablet buyer, but its uninspiring display, sluggish transitions, and poor graphics should give you pause when better models are not dramatically pricier...

30 April 2013

The Coby MID8065 offers decent performance, a great price, and a nice alternative to 7 and 10 inch tablets with widescreen displays.But it?s tough to recommend this particular tablet because of...

25 April 2013

The Coby MID8065 is an affordable Android tablet with an in-between 8-inch screen size and uncommon aspect ratio. It's a decent performer, but if you can spend a little more, there are better...

23 April 2013

The Coby MID8065 is an affordable Android tablet with an in-between 8-inch screen size and uncommon aspect ratio. It's a decent performer, but if you can spend a little more, there are better...

+- Manufacturer's Description

Product Identifiers

Barcodes 00716829786581
Feedback