Report an incorrect priceFound it cheaper elsewhere?
Searching for international prices ...
Assumed Exchange Rates
Searching for prices in ...
12 Reasons For
On average Asus small monitors have good reviews compared to other manufacturers as do all PC monitors manufactured by Asus.
Good Product Quality
A few customers who reviewed the Asus MB169C+ reckoned that it was good quality. A few weeks ago Amazon Customer mentioned “Picture quality is great and its compact” in their Asus MB169C+ review. Patrick C. gave it a score of 5 stars and he said on Amazon “Decent image quality to boot” in his Asus MB169C+ review.
Good Picture Quality
A number of Asus MB169C+ reviewers who purchased the Asus MB169C+ considered that it had good picture quality.
LED Display Type
This flatpanel monitor has an LED display type, which is typical of many flatpanel monitors that were launched around the same time as it.
We compared all the other flatpanel monitors that have an LED Display to this PC monitor and we think because of it's better review score, the Hannspree HP194DJB, the LG 19MB35PM ($156.45), and the HP EliteDisplay S140u ($92.99) is also worth considering.
1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution
The most display resolution of the MB169C+ is 1920 x 1080 pixels. That's 98% more display resolution than the most frequently found display resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels.
A 1920 x 1080 pixels display resolution is actually the best display resolution across all PC screens that are a similar age to the MB169C+.
The worst display resolution across similar types of PC monitor is 1366 x 768 pixels.
Quite Fast Response Time
Across all the small monitors that were released in the last 12 months the response times range from 4ms to 14ms, and the average response time is 6ms. The Asus MB169C+ has one of the faster response times (only 5 milliseconds) amongst PC displays of this age.
+7 More reasons for
1920 X 1080 (HD 1080) Graphics Resolution
The MB169C+ has a maximum resolution of 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080). That's 49% less resolution than the most common graphics resolution of 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA). The resolution of all PC screens that were launched in the last 12 months ranges from 480 x 272 to 4096 x 2160.
HD HD Type
This LCD screen has a Full HD HD type, which is the most frequently found HD type on comparable spec PC displays that have been around for around the same time as it.
The Asus MB169C+ is fairly narrow (only 379.1 millimeters) compared to most of the other new PC screens. Across all the newly released small monitors the widths range from 140mm to 480mm, and the average width is 420mm.
At only 235.8 millimeters, the MB169C+ is quite short compared to most of the other small monitors that have been around for around the same time as the MB169C+. The shortest PC display that has been around for the last year is 75mm tall, the tallest is 450mm, and the average height is 300mm.
At only 800 grams, the MB169C+ is quite light compared to most of the other small monitors that have been available for the last year. Across all the new small monitors the weights range from 160g to 12kg, and the average weight is 3kg.
When compared to other LCD screens that have been available for the last year, the MB169C+'s depth of only 8.5 millimeters is one of the shallowest. Newly released small monitors have depths of between 8.5mm and 440mm.
8 Reasons Against
User Reviews Are Poor
Based on 7 user reviews the average user rating of this small monitor is 46 out of 100. This means that owners really don't rate this LCD screen very highly.
One customer wrote in their reviews that the Asus MB169C+ was not good looking.
One Asus MB169C+ reviewer said in their reviews that it was not good in terms of USB connections. Patrick C. mentioned on Amazon “It is not using the USB protocol for sending the video data to the screen” in his review of the Asus MB169C+ however despite that he scored the product 5 stars.
Does Not Have a Built-In Speaker
Like most of the other small monitors that have been on the market for a similar time to the MB169C+, the MB169C+ does not have a built-in speaker.
We compared all the other PC displays which also have a built-in speaker to this flatpanel monitor and we think the LG 19MB35PM ($156.45), or the Hannspree HP194DJB is also worth considering.
+5 More reasons against
Does Not Have an Integrated Card Reader
Like most of the other comparable spec LCD screens that have been available for a similar time to the MB169C+, the MB169C+ does not have an integrated card reader.
Not 3D Compatible
Most similar spec flatpanel monitors that have been around for around the same time as the MB169C+ are not 3D compatible. The MB169C+ is no exception to this as it too is not 3D compatible.
Does Not Have a Built-In Camera
Most small monitors that have been available for around the same time as the MB169C+ do not have a built-in camera. The MB169C+ is no exception to this as it too does not have a built-in camera.
Very Small Display Diagonal
The Asus MB169C+ has a fairly small display diagonal (only 39.62 centimeters) compared to most of the other comparable spec PC monitors that were released in the last 12 months. The average display diagonal of latest small monitors is 62cm.
Been looking to buy myself a portable monitor for sometime now, and when this one came out I thought I had found what seemed to be the perfect one. Not too expensive for an IPS panel for this type... Read more…
It's a shame that people are reviewing this product based off of their own stupidity. It's not ASUS's fault you cannot read the specs that it requires a USB-C connection. I have a MacBook with a... Read more…
I should have heeded the other reviewers, but was overly optimistic. My new MSI GP62 6QF laptop has a 'C' connector sure enough, but I connected the monitor with absolutely no result! Unusually... Read more…
I couldn't even get this to work on my Macbook Pro 2013 as its display port is for USB-C only . This means you cannot buy a USB-C to USB 3.0 Type A cable and use it. I have bought a USB-C to USB... Read more…
@ $0.103843428 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price $per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Hide electricity usage and price
Water cost when switched on
@ $0.00148229104 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price $per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Hide water usage and price
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years
Running costs for this PC monitor have been estimated based on other similar PC monitors. If you know how much electricity and water the Asus MB169C+uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.056 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 2 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.
Previous and future annual running costs of the Asus MB169C+ assuming future electricity price inflation of 0.0600% per year. Edit inflation assumptions