Asus MX239H vs Benq RL2455 vs DELL S2415H

(250)
(304)
(28)
Asus MX239H
Benq RL2455
DELL S2415H

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
BestBuy
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus MX239H has a vertical viewing angle of 178°° (as does the DELL S2415H), however the Benq RL2455 is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2415H. That's 8° wider than the Benq RL2455 (178°°).
One more HDMI port Edit
The Asus MX239H has two HDMI ports (as does the Benq RL2455), however the DELL S2415H only has one HDMI port.
Higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 6WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2415H. That's 2W higher than the Benq RL2455 (6WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Cheaper by $11
The Asus MX239H costs $11 less than the Benq RL2455 and costs $13.01 less than the DELL S2415H.
10 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
One more awards
The Asus MX239H has 2 awards from expert review sites, whereas the Benq RL2455 has 1 award.
Better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Asus MX239H is 77% based on 6 reviews, however the average rating of the Benq RL2455 is 70% (based on 9 reviews).
5 Reasons For
Moderately bigger screen size Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a screen size of 24"", but the Asus MX239H is only a 23"" PC monitor (1" smaller) and the DELL S2415H is only a 23.8"" PC monitor (0.2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

2.56cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a display diagonal of 60.96cmcm, but the Asus MX239H is only a 58.4cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (2.56cm smaller) and the DELL S2415H is only a 60.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.46cm smaller).
5x faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 1msms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms faster than the Asus MX239H (6msms) and 5ms faster than the DELL S2415H (6msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Benq RL2455 is two, and so does the Asus MX239H, but the DELL S2415H only has one HDMI port.
User reviews are moderately better
Based on 295 user reviews, the Benq RL2455 has an average review score of 92%, but the Asus MX239H has an average rating of 91% (based on 244 reviews) and the DELL S2415H has an average rating of 90% (based on 27 reviews).
5 Reasons For
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL S2415H is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the Asus MX239H. That's 18° wider than the Benq RL2455 (178°°).
Marginally wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL S2415H has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°° (as does the Asus MX239H), whereas the Benq RL2455 is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
13% larger color gamut Edit
The DELL S2415H is an 85%% color gamut PC monitor. That's 13% larger than the Benq RL2455 (85%%).
2W higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The DELL S2415H has an RMS rated audio power of 6WW (as does the Asus MX239H), but the Benq RL2455 is only a 4WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (2W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Lighter Edit
The DELL S2415H is a 3.2kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.5g lighter than the Asus MX239H (3.2kgg) and 0.9g lighter than the Benq RL2455 (3.2kgg).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
5% smaller screen size Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 23"" PC monitor. That's 1" smaller than the Benq RL2455 (23.8"") and 0.8" smaller than the DELL S2415H (23.8""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 58.4cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 2.56cm smaller than the Benq RL2455 (60.5cmcm) and 2.1cm smaller than the DELL S2415H (60.5cmcm).
Hugely slower response time Edit
The Asus MX239H has a response time of 5msms, but the Benq RL2455 is a 1msms response time PC monitor (4ms faster) and the DELL S2415H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

14% heavier Edit
The Asus MX239H has a weight of 3.7kgg, however the Benq RL2455 is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor (0.4g heavier) and the DELL S2415H is a 3.2kgg weight PC monitor (0.5g lighter).
Older by over three years
The Asus MX239H is ten months older than the Benq RL2455 and three years older than the DELL S2415H.
User review Rating is slightly Worse
The Asus MX239H's average user score is 91%, however the Benq RL2455's is 92% (based on 295 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the Asus MX239H and the DELL S2415H (178°°).
Marginally narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°°, but the Asus MX239H and the DELL S2415H are both 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
Smaller color gamut Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 72%% color gamut PC monitor. That's 13% smaller than the DELL S2415H (85%%).
2W lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Benq RL2455 has an RMS rated audio power of 4WW, however the Asus MX239H and the DELL S2415H are both 6WW RMS rated audio power PC monitors (2W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Heavier Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.4g heavier than the Asus MX239H (3.2kgg) and 0.9g heavier than the DELL S2415H (3.2kgg).
$11 more expensive
The Benq RL2455 is more expensive than the Asus MX239H by $11.
Not as many stockists
Only 3 sellers sells the Benq RL2455, however 13 sellers sell the Asus MX239H and 7 retailers sell the DELL S2415H. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Over two years older
The Benq RL2455 is older than the DELL S2415H by two years.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Benq RL2455 has received 1 award, the Asus MX239H has received 2 awards.
Lower expert review Score
The Benq RL2455 only has an average expert rating of 70%, but the Asus MX239H has an average expert rating of 77% (based on 6 reviews).
8 Reasons Against
Moderately smaller screen size Edit
The DELL S2415H has a screen size of 23.8"", whereas the Asus MX239H is a 23"" PC monitor (0.8" smaller) and the Benq RL2455 is a 24"" PC monitor (0.2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

0.46cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL S2415H has a display diagonal of 60.5cmcm, whereas the Asus MX239H is a 58.4cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (2.1cm smaller) and the Benq RL2455 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.46cm bigger).
Slower response time Edit
The DELL S2415H is a 6msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the Asus MX239H (6msms) and 5ms slower than the Benq RL2455 (6msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The DELL S2415H is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Benq RL2455 only has two HDMI ports.
Only DVI ports Edit
The DELL S2415H has DVI ports, however the Benq RL2455 only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the Asus MX239H. It is possible that it does not have any DVI ports.

$13 more expensive
The DELL S2415H is more expensive than the Asus MX239H by $13.01 and more expensive than the Benq RL2455 by $2.01.
Fewer sellers
Only 7 sellers sells the DELL S2415H, but 13 stores sell the Asus MX239H. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Moderately Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the DELL S2415H is 90%, whereas the average user rating of the Asus MX239H is 91% (based on 244 reviews) and the Benq RL2455 is 92% (based on 295 reviews).

Awards

2 Awards
hardwaremx.com: Gold Award
maxit.com.my: Design Award
1 Award
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

50 months Ago 40 months Ago 15 months Ago

Display

Screen Size
23" 24"
BEST
23.8"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Horizontal Frequency
28 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 605mm
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 296.46mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 527.04mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
28 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.2652 x 0.2652 0.276 x 0.276 0.2745 x 0.2745
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
58.4cm 60.96cm
BEST
60.5cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 1ms
BEST
6ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72% 85%
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1 1
HDMI Port
2
BEST
2
BEST
1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
BEST

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
6W
BEST
4W 6W
BEST
Loudspeaker
2 2 2

Design

Coloured Feet
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 15 Unknown - Click to provide data
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 17 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.2A
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
33W 27W 18W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 36W
Input Voltage
 110 - 240
 110 - 240
 110 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
6.1kg 5.7kg
BEST
6.8kg
Packaging Height
472mm 420mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
131mm
BEST
134mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
615mm
BEST
650mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.1kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 435mm 404.6mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 189mm 180mm
BEST
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 579mm 539.2mm
BEST
Weight
3.7kg 4.1kg 3.2kg
BEST
Height
392.2mm 435mm 321.1mm
Depth
207.2mm 189mm 45.5mm
Width
522.2mm 579mm 539.2mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
BEST
Interface Adapters Included
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male

Other Features

Volume Control
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Dimensions With Stand
522.2 x 207.2 x 392.2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback