Asus MX279H vs Asus VG248QE vs Asus VN279 vs Asus VX279

(320)
(357)
(45)
(80)
Asus MX279H
Asus VG248QE
Asus VN279
Asus VX279

Top Prices

Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Newegg US
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
12% bigger screen size Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 27"" PC monitor, and so do the Asus VN279 and the Asus VX279. That's 3" bigger than the Asus VG248QE (27""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus MX279H has a vertical viewing angle of 178°° (as do the Asus VN279 and the Asus VX279), however the Asus VG248QE is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Asus VN279 and the Asus VX279. That's 8° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°°).
One more HDMI port Edit
The Asus MX279H has two HDMI ports, however the Asus VX279 only has one HDMI port.
50% higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 6WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 2W higher than the Asus VG248QE and the Asus VN279 (3WW) and 3W higher than the Asus VX279 (3WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

4 Reasons For
A lot brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a display brightness of 350 cd/m² cd/m², but the Asus MX279H and the Asus VX279 are both only 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (100 cd/m² dimmer) and the Asus VN279 is only a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
4ms faster response time Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 1msms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms faster than the Asus MX279H, the Asus VN279 and the Asus VX279 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Eleven more awards
The Asus VG248QE has 13 awards, however the Asus MX279H has 10 awards and the Asus VX279 has 2 awards.
User reviews are better
Based on 319 user reviews, the Asus VG248QE has an average review score of 94%, but the Asus MX279H has an average rating of 89% (based on 285 reviews), the Asus VN279 has an average rating of 84% (based on 42 reviews) and the Asus VX279 has an average rating of 84% (based on 70 reviews).
7 Reasons For
12% bigger screen size Edit
The Asus VN279 is a 27"" PC monitor, and so do the Asus MX279H and the Asus VX279. That's 3" bigger than the Asus VG248QE (27""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus VN279 has a vertical viewing angle of 178°° (as do the Asus MX279H and the Asus VX279), however the Asus VG248QE is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus VN279 is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Asus MX279H and the Asus VX279. That's 8° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°°).
67% lower power consumption when off Edit
The Asus VN279 is a 0.3WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.2W lower than the Asus MX279H, the Asus VG248QE and the Asus VX279 (0.5WW).
Cheaper by $40
The Asus VN279 costs $93 less than the Asus MX279H and costs $40 less than the Asus VG248QE.
8 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Vastly better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Asus VN279 is 100% based on 3 reviews, however the average rating of the Asus MX279H is 80% (based on 35 reviews), the average rating of the Asus VG248QE is 78% (based on 38 reviews) and the average rating of the Asus VX279 is 80% (based on 10 reviews).
4 Reasons For
12% bigger screen size Edit
The Asus VX279 has a screen size of 27"" (as do the Asus MX279H and the Asus VN279), however the Asus VG248QE is only a 24"" PC monitor (3" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus VX279 is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Asus MX279H and the Asus VN279. That's 18° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°°).
Slightly wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus VX279 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°° (as do the Asus MX279H and the Asus VN279), however the Asus VG248QE is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Lighter Edit
The Asus VX279 is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.6g lighter than the Asus MX279H (4.6kgg), 0.9g lighter than the Asus VG248QE (4.6kgg) and 1.5g lighter than the Asus VN279 (4.6kgg).

Reasons Against

11 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the Asus VX279. That's 100 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VG248QE (250 cd/m² cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VN279 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
4ms slower response time Edit
The Asus MX279H has a response time of 5msms (as do the Asus VN279 and the Asus VX279), but the Asus VG248QE is a 1msms response time PC monitor (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less DVI port Edit
The number of DVI ports on the Asus MX279H is , but the Asus VG248QE only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the Asus VN279 or the Asus VX279. It is possible that they do not have any DVI ports.

Higher power consumption when off Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 0.5WW power consumption when off PC monitor, and so do the Asus VG248QE and the Asus VX279. That's 0.2W higher than the Asus VN279 (0.5WW).
12% heavier Edit
The Asus MX279H has a weight of 5.2kgg, however the Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.3g heavier), the Asus VN279 is a 6.1kgg weight PC monitor (0.9g heavier) and the Asus VX279 is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor (0.6g lighter).
More expensive by $93
The Asus MX279H is $53 more expensive than the Asus VG248QE and $93 more expensive than the Asus VN279.
Less retailers
The Asus MX279H is only stocked by 9 retailers, whereas the Asus VG248QE is stocked by 11 stores and the Asus VN279 is stocked by 17 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by nine months
The Asus MX279H is two months older than the Asus VG248QE, nine months older than the Asus VN279 and eight months older than the Asus VX279.
Three less awards
The Asus MX279H has only received 10 awards, whereas the Asus VG248QE has received 13 awards.
Expert review Rating is vastly Worse
The Asus MX279H's average expert score is 80%, however the Asus VN279's is 100% (based on 3 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The Asus MX279H's average user score is 89%, however the Asus VG248QE's is 94% (based on 319 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a screen size of 24"", but the Asus MX279H, the Asus VN279 and the Asus VX279 are all 27"" PC monitors (3" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the Asus MX279H, the Asus VN279 and the Asus VX279 (178°°).
Moderately narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°°, but the Asus MX279H, the Asus VN279 and the Asus VX279 are all 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
Only one HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Asus VG248QE is one, and so do the Asus VN279 and the Asus VX279, but the Asus MX279H only has two HDMI ports.
2W lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus VG248QE has an RMS rated audio power of 4WW (as does the Asus VN279), however the Asus MX279H is a 6WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (2W higher) and the Asus VX279 is a 3WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (1W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

A lot higher power consumption when off Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a power consumption when off of 0.5WW (as do the Asus MX279H and the Asus VX279), whereas the Asus VN279 is a 0.3WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.2W lower).
Heavier Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.3g heavier than the Asus MX279H (4.6kgg), 0.6g lighter than the Asus VN279 (4.6kgg) and 0.9g heavier than the Asus VX279 (4.6kgg).
$40 more expensive
The Asus VG248QE is more expensive than the Asus VN279 by $40.
Not as many stockists
Only 11 sellers sells the Asus VG248QE, however 17 shops sell the Asus VN279. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Seven months older
The Asus VG248QE is older than the Asus VN279 by seven months and older than the Asus VX279 by six months.
Hugely Lower expert review Score
The Asus VG248QE only has an average expert rating of 78%, but the Asus MX279H has an average expert rating of 80% (based on 35 reviews), the Asus VN279 has an average expert rating of 100% (based on 3 reviews) and the Asus VX279 has an average expert rating of 80% (based on 10 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
17% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus VN279 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Asus MX279H and the Asus VX279 (250 cd/m² cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VG248QE (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Hugely slower response time Edit
The Asus VN279 has a response time of 5msms (as do the Asus MX279H and the Asus VX279), but the Asus VG248QE is a 1msms response time PC monitor (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The Asus VN279 has one HDMI port (as do the Asus VG248QE and the Asus VX279), however the Asus MX279H only has two HDMI ports.
One less DVI port Edit
The number of DVI ports on the Asus VN279 is , but the Asus VG248QE only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the Asus MX279H or the Asus VX279. It is possible that they do not have any DVI ports.

Lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus VN279 is a 4WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor, and so does the Asus VG248QE. That's 2W lower than the Asus MX279H (3WW) and 1W higher than the Asus VX279 (3WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

25% heavier Edit
The Asus VN279 has a weight of 6.1kgg, however the Asus MX279H is a 5.2kgg weight PC monitor (0.9g lighter), the Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.6g lighter) and the Asus VX279 is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor (1.5g lighter).
User review Rating is considerably Worse
The Asus VN279's average user score is 84%, however the Asus MX279H's is 89% (based on 285 reviews) and the Asus VG248QE's is 94% (based on 319 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
A lot dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus VX279 has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m² (as does the Asus MX279H), however the Asus VG248QE is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² brighter) and the Asus VN279 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The Asus VX279 is a 5msms response time PC monitor, and so do the Asus MX279H and the Asus VN279. That's 4ms slower than the Asus VG248QE (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The Asus VX279 has one HDMI port, and so do the Asus VG248QE and the Asus VN279, however the Asus MX279H only has two HDMI ports.
Only DVI ports Edit
The number of DVI ports on the Asus VX279 is , but the Asus VG248QE only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the Asus MX279H or the Asus VN279. It is possible that they do not have any DVI ports.

3W lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus VX279 has an RMS rated audio power of 3WW, whereas the Asus MX279H is a 6WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (3W higher) and the Asus VG248QE and the Asus VN279 are both 4WW RMS rated audio power PC monitors (1W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

A lot higher power consumption when off Edit
The Asus VX279 has a power consumption when off of 0.5WW (as do the Asus MX279H and the Asus VG248QE), but the Asus VN279 is a 0.3WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.2W lower).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
One month older
The Asus VX279 is older than the Asus VN279 by one month.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Asus VX279 has received 2 awards, the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards and the Asus VG248QE has received 13 awards.
Vastly Lower expert review Score
The Asus VX279's average expert rating is 80%, however the Asus VN279's is 100% (based on 3 reviews).
Appreciably Lower user review Score
The Asus VX279's average user rating is 84%, however the Asus MX279H's is 89% (based on 285 reviews) and the Asus VG248QE's is 94% (based on 319 reviews).

Awards

10 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
ferra.ru: Recommended
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hardware.info: Silver Award
hardwaremx.com: Editor's Choice
techno-labs.com: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Editor's Choice
uk.hardware.info: Silver
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
13 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
hardware.info: Silver Award
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
moddingmx.com: Gold
ozeros.com: Recommended
profesionalreview.com: Gold
Techsweden.org: Value for Money
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
No awards found 2 Awards
overclock3d.net: Gold Award
thepcenthusiast.com: Highly Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

50 months Ago 49 months Ago 42 months Ago 42 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 42.91
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 45.24
Purchase price $ 166.99
Total cost of ownership $ 212.23
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data
0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
27"
BEST
24" 27"
BEST
27"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
56 - 76 50 - 144 56 - 75 56 - 76
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 80 30 - 140 31.5 - 67.5 30 - 80
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75 56 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 31.5 - 67.5 30 - 80
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.2768 x 0.2768 0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm Unknown - Click to provide data 68.6cm 68.6cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 1ms
BEST
5ms 5ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 1
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 3 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1 1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 3 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

Audio System
Bang & Olufsen ICEpower Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Audio Power
6W
BEST
4W 4W 3W
Loudspeaker
2 2 2 2

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
20 - -5 15 - 5 -5 - 22 -5 - 20

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Typical Power Consumption
37W 45W 35W
BEST
46W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W 0.5W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Safety Certification
 RoHS
 WEEE
 RoHS
 WEEE
 RoHS
 WEEE
 RoHS
 WEEE
Compliance Industry Standard
 Rohs
 Rohs
 Rohs
BEST
 Rohs
BEST

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8kg 8.1kg 7.5kg
BEST
7kg
Packaging Height
537mm 413mm
BEST
536mm 550mm
Packaging Depth
114mm
BEST
221mm 188mm 119mm
Packaging Width
700mm 674mm
BEST
706mm 680mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4.8kg 4.6kg
BEST
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 499.9mm 440.4mm
BEST
441.3mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 231mm 209.8mm
BEST
210.1mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 569.4mm
BEST
619.2mm 622.6mm
Weight
5.2kg 5.5kg 6.1kg 4.6kg
BEST
Height
441.3mm 340.4mm 526mm 441.3mm
Depth
225.2mm 57.3mm 225.5mm 210.1mm
Width
622.6mm 569.4mm 619.2mm 622.6mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
Interface Adapters Included
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male

Other Features

Volume Control
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
Placement
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
Feedback