DELL U2414H vs Eizo FlexScan EV2450

(229)
(4)
Eizo FlexScan EV2450

Top Prices

eBay
In stock, only 3 left!
Amazon US
Out of stock
Adorama
Delivery unknown
In stock (67 available)
eBay
In stock (19 available)
Overstock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
One more DisplayPort Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the DELL U2414H is two, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 only has one DisplayPort.
Four USB 3.0 ports Edit
The DELL U2414H has four USB 3.0 ports, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 only has three USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL U2414H is two, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 only has one HDMI port.
One more USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A port Edit
The number of USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports on the DELL U2414H is four, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 only has three USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports.
Four USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The DELL U2414H has four USB Type-A downstream ports, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports.
Lighter Edit
The DELL U2414H is a 3.6kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.2g lighter than the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 (3.8kgg).
$151 cheaper
The DELL U2414H costs $228.99, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is $379.99.
5 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the DELL U2414H (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a 140mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 10mm higher than the DELL U2414H (140mmmm).
27W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 has a maximum power consumption of 47WW, whereas the DELL U2414H is a 74WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (27W higher).
Available from 4 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
User reviews are appreciably better
Based on 3 reviews, the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 has an average user review score of 100%, whereas the DELL U2414H has an average rating of 89% (based on 219 reviews).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The DELL U2414H is an 8msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only DVI ports Edit
The DELL U2414H is a DVI port PC monitor, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 only has one DVI port.
Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2414H is a 130mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 10mm lower than the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 (140mmmm).
27W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2414H has a maximum power consumption of 74WW, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a 47WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (27W lower).
Not as many stockists
Only 4 retailers sells the DELL U2414H, however 8 retailers sell the Eizo FlexScan EV2450. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Six months older
The DELL U2414H is older than the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 by six months.
Appreciably Lower user review Score
The DELL U2414H has an average user rating of 89%, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 has an average user rating of 100% (based on 3 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
One less DisplayPort Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2414H only has two DisplayPorts.
Only three USB 3.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is three, but the DELL U2414H only has four USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2414H only has two HDMI ports.
One less USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A port Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a three USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2414H only has four USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports.
Only two USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is two, but the DELL U2414H only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
Heavier Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is a 3.8kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.2g heavier than the DELL U2414H (3.8kgg).
$151 more expensive
The Eizo FlexScan EV2450 is more expensive than the DELL U2414H by $151.

Awards

3 Awards
alphr.com: Recommended
pcauthority.com.au: Hot Award
ua.gecid.com: High Functionality
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

22 months Ago 16 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
23.8" 23.8"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 49 - 61
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 15 - 68
Viewable Size Diagonal
605mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
296.46mm 296.4mm
BEST
Viewable Width
527.04mm 527mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
56 - 76 55 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 31 - 81
Pixel Pitch
0.274 x 0.274 0.2745 x 0.2745
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
60.47cm 60.4cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 5ms
BEST
Color Gamut
85% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Ultra Contrast
 Ultra Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1
USB Version
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
DisplayPort
2
BEST
1
USB 3.0 Port
4
BEST
3
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Mini DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
4
BEST
3
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4
BEST
2
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Upstream Port Type
 USB Type-B
 USB Type-B

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 2W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Coloured Feet
 Silver
 Silver
Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -90 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
130mm 140mm
BEST
Tilt Angle
-22 - 6.5 -5 - 35
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -172 - 172
Automatic Shut Off
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (SIMPL)
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 JPN
 POR
 ESP
 CHI (TR)
 ITA
 SWE
 CHI (SIMPL)
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 JPN
 POR
 ESP
 CHI (TR)
 ITA
 SWE
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 9

Power

Input Current
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
16W 12W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 25kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
74W 47W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 6 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 EPEAT Gold
 RoHS
 TCO
 EPEAT Gold
Compliance Industry Standard
 Rohs
 Rohs
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width At Bottom
6.05mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width At Top
6.05mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width On Side
6.05mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
8kg 6.2kg
BEST
Height With Stand
485.8mm 473.5mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
185mm
BEST
233mm
Width With Stand
539.1mm 537.6mm
BEST
Weight
3.6kg
BEST
3.8kg
Height
321.1mm 317.6mm
Depth
45.6mm 47.9mm
Width
539.1mm 537.6mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
Feedback