DELL P2714H vs DELL S2715H vs HP Pavilion 27

(20)
(36)
DELL P2714H
HP Pavilion 27

Top Prices

Amazon US
Out of stock
Adorama
Delivery unknown
In stock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
Overstock
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
pestmall
Delivery unknown
edabukletbyadshoez
Delivery unknown
In stock (49 available)
Best Buy
Delivery unknown
In stock (2000 available)

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL P2714H is a 597.9mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 0.0099999999999909mm bigger than the DELL S2715H and the HP Pavilion 27 (597.89mmmm).
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL P2714H is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2715H. That's 0.099999999999994cm bigger than the HP Pavilion 27 (68.5cmcm).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL P2714H is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the DELL S2715H and the HP Pavilion 27 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Four USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the DELL P2714H is four, but the DELL S2715H only has two USB 2.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the HP Pavilion 27. It is possible that it does not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Two more USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The DELL P2714H has four USB Type-A downstream ports, however the DELL S2715H only has two USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the HP Pavilion 27. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

Lighter Edit
The DELL P2714H has a weight of 4.6kgg, but the DELL S2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (0.3g heavier) and the HP Pavilion 27 is a 5.3kgg weight PC monitor (0.7g heavier).
6 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL P2714H. That's 0.099999999999994cm bigger than the HP Pavilion 27 (68.5cmcm).
A lot faster response time Edit
The DELL S2715H has a response time of 6msms, however the DELL P2714H is an 8msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower) and the HP Pavilion 27 is a 7msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

26% shorter Edit
DELL S2715H is 361.5mmmm tall. That's 18.4mm shorter than the DELL P2714H (454mmmm) and 92.5mm shorter than the HP Pavilion 27 (454mmmm).
Narrower Edit
DELL S2715H is 611.2mmmm wide. That's 30.2mm narrower than the DELL P2714H (622mmmm) and 10.8mm narrower than the HP Pavilion 27 (622mmmm).
Cheaper by $110
The DELL S2715H is $155.01 cheaper than the DELL P2714H and $110 cheaper than the HP Pavilion 27.
9 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
2 Reasons For
Lower maximum power consumption Edit
The HP Pavilion 27 is a 35WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 8W lower than the DELL P2714H (35WW) and 20W lower than the DELL S2715H (35WW).
Better user reviews
The average user review score of the HP Pavilion 27 is 93%, however the average rating of the DELL S2715H is 88% (based on 19 reviews).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
2ms slower response time Edit
The DELL P2714H has a response time of 8msms, whereas the DELL S2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster) and the HP Pavilion 27 is a 7msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL P2714H is a 43WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 12W lower than the DELL S2715H (35WW) and 8W higher than the HP Pavilion 27 (35WW).
Taller Edit
The DELL P2714H has a height of 379.9mmmm. That's 18.4mm taller than the DELL S2715H (454mmmm) and 74.1mm shorter than the HP Pavilion 27 (454mmmm).
5% wider Edit
The DELL P2714H has a width of 641.4mmmm. That's 30.2mm wider than the DELL S2715H (622mmmm) and 19.4mm wider than the HP Pavilion 27 (622mmmm).
More expensive by $155
The DELL P2714H is $155.01 more expensive than the DELL S2715H and $45.01 more expensive than the HP Pavilion 27.
Not as many stockists
The DELL P2714H is only stocked by 3 stores, however the DELL S2715H is stocked by 11 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by eleven months
The DELL P2714H is eleven months older than the DELL S2715H.
8 Reasons Against
1% smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 597.89mmmm viewable width PC monitor, and so does the HP Pavilion 27. That's 0.0099999999999909mm smaller than the DELL P2714H (597.89mmmm).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the HP Pavilion 27. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL P2714H (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Only two USB 2.0 ports Edit
The DELL S2715H is a two USB 2.0 port PC monitor, whereas the DELL P2714H only has four USB 2.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the HP Pavilion 27. It is possible that it does not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

One less DVI port Edit
The DELL S2715H has DVI ports, however the HP Pavilion 27 only has one DVI port.
Two less USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL S2715H is two, but the DELL P2714H only has four USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the HP Pavilion 27. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 55WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 12W higher than the DELL P2714H (35WW) and 20W higher than the HP Pavilion 27 (35WW).
Slightly heavier Edit
The DELL S2715H has a weight of 4.9kgg, whereas the DELL P2714H is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor (0.3g lighter) and the HP Pavilion 27 is a 5.3kgg weight PC monitor (0.4g heavier).
User review Rating is Worse
The average user rating of the DELL S2715H is 88%, whereas the average user rating of the HP Pavilion 27 is 93% (based on 27 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
1% smaller viewable width Edit
The HP Pavilion 27 is a 597.89mmmm viewable width PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2715H. That's 0.0099999999999909mm smaller than the DELL P2714H (597.89mmmm).
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Pavilion 27 is a 68.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.099999999999994cm smaller than the DELL P2714H and the DELL S2715H (68.5cmcm).
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP Pavilion 27 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2715H. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL P2714H (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Slower response time Edit
The HP Pavilion 27 has a response time of 7msms, but the DELL P2714H is an 8msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower) and the DELL S2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

14% heavier Edit
The HP Pavilion 27 has a weight of 5.3kgg, however the DELL P2714H is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor (0.7g lighter) and the DELL S2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (0.4g lighter).
92.5mm taller Edit
The HP Pavilion 27 is a 454mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 74.1mm taller than the DELL P2714H (454mmmm) and 92.5mm taller than the DELL S2715H (454mmmm).
Wider Edit
The HP Pavilion 27 is a 622mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 19.4mm narrower than the DELL P2714H (622mmmm) and 10.8mm wider than the DELL S2715H (622mmmm).
More expensive by $110
The HP Pavilion 27 is $110 more expensive than the DELL S2715H.
Less retailers
The HP Pavilion 27 is only stocked by 2 retailers, whereas the DELL P2714H is stocked by 3 sellers and the DELL S2715H is stocked by 11 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by over one year
The HP Pavilion 27 is eight months older than the DELL P2714H and 19 months older than the DELL S2715H.

Awards

No awards found No awards found 1 Award
Digitaltrends.com: Recommended Product

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

37 months Ago 26 months Ago 46 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
Product Type
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Height
336.3mm
BEST
336.31mm 336.31mm
Viewable Width
597.9mm
BEST
597.89mm 597.89mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 24 - 94
Pixel Pitch
0.1 x 0.1 0.3114 x 0.3114 0.311 x 0.311
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm
BEST
68.6cm
BEST
68.5cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 6ms
BEST
7ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
4
BEST
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1 1
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
1
BEST
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4
BEST
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 18W 4W
BEST
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2

Design

Coloured Feet
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mean Time Between Failures
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30,000h

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
115mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 25

Power

Input Current
1.5A 1.7A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
22W 20W
BEST
32W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 39kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
43W 55W 35W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 5 - 90 20 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80 20 - 70
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
9.9kg 8.8kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.7kg 5.6kg
BEST
Height With Stand
539mm 445mm
BEST
454.6mm
Depth With Stand
204mm 196mm 164mm
BEST
Width With Stand
641.4mm 611.2mm
BEST
622.6mm
Weight
4.6kg
BEST
4.9kg 5.3kg
Height
379.9mm 361.5mm
BEST
454mm
Depth
46.1mm 46.1mm 192mm
BEST
Width
641.4mm 611.2mm
BEST
622mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 DVI
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 DVI
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 DVI
Feedback