Acer G247HYL vs Asus VS24 vs DELL U2412M vs HP EliteDisplay E242

(102)
(516)
Acer G247HYL
Asus VS24
HP EliteDisplay E242

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
Newegg UK
Newegg US
In stock
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Sam's Club
Delivery unknown
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
4ms faster response time Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a response time of 4msms, whereas the Asus VS24 is a 5msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower), the DELL U2412M is an 8msms response time PC monitor (4ms slower) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7msms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

4% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 29kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 1kWh lower than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (30kWhkWh).
Hugely lighter Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a weight of 2.6kgg, but the Asus VS24 is a 6.1kgg weight PC monitor (3.5g heavier), the DELL U2412M is a 4kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g heavier) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kgg weight PC monitor (1.6g heavier).
Shorter Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a height of 325mmmm. That's 209.5mm shorter than the Asus VS24 (377.4mmmm), 36.6mm shorter than the DELL U2412M (377.4mmmm) and 52.4mm shorter than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (377.4mmmm).
5% narrower Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a width of 540mmmm. That's 21.6mm narrower than the Asus VS24 (562.2mmmm), 16mm narrower than the DELL U2412M (562.2mmmm) and 22.2mm narrower than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (562.2mmmm).
Cheaper by $32
The Acer G247HYL costs $87.99, whereas the Asus VS24 is $119.99, the DELL U2412M is $339.00 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is $237.70.
4 Reasons For
2% bigger screen size Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 24.1"" PC monitor. That's 0.3" bigger than the Acer G247HYL (24"") and 0.1" bigger than the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 61.13cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.63cm bigger than the Acer G247HYL (60.96cmcm) and 0.17cm bigger than the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (60.96cmcm).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Acer G247HYL and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
12 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
5 Reasons For
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL U2412M has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m² (as does the Asus VS24), however the Acer G247HYL and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are both only 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Two more USB 2.0 ports Edit
The DELL U2412M has five USB 2.0 ports, however the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has three USB 2.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Acer G247HYL or the Asus VS24. It is possible that they do not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Five USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The DELL U2412M is a five USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Acer G247HYL or the Asus VS24. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

Expert reviews are a little better
The DELL U2412M has an average expert review score of 82%, however the Asus VS24 has an average rating of 80% (based on 2 reviews).
User reviews are a little better
The DELL U2412M has an average user review score of 93%, however the Asus VS24 has an average rating of 90% (based on 100 reviews).
3 Reasons For
35mm higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a maximum height adjustment of 150mmmm, whereas the DELL U2412M is only a 115mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (35mm lower).
Two times lower power consumption when off Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 0.24WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.21W lower than the Acer G247HYL (0.24WW) and 0.26W lower than the Asus VS24 (0.24WW).
Lower maximum power consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 38WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 34W lower than the DELL U2412M (38WW).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 23.8"" PC monitor. That's 0.3" smaller than the Asus VS24 (24"") and 0.2" smaller than the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

2% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 60.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.63cm smaller than the Asus VS24 (60.96cmcm) and 0.46cm smaller than the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (60.96cmcm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Higher power consumption when off Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 0.45WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.05W lower than the Asus VS24 (0.24WW) and 0.21W higher than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (0.24WW).
Not as many stockists
The Acer G247HYL is only stocked by 10 retailers, however the Asus VS24 is stocked by 13 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by four months
The Acer G247HYL is four months older than the HP EliteDisplay E242.
9 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The Asus VS24 has a response time of 5msms, but the Acer G247HYL is a 4msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster), the DELL U2412M is an 8msms response time PC monitor (3ms slower) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

52% higher power consumption when off Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 0.5WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.05W higher than the Acer G247HYL (0.24WW) and 0.26W higher than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (0.24WW).
Vastly heavier Edit
The Asus VS24 has a weight of 6.1kgg, however the Acer G247HYL is a 2.6kgg weight PC monitor (3.5g lighter), the DELL U2412M is a 4kgg weight PC monitor (2.1g lighter) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kgg weight PC monitor (1.9g lighter).
40% taller Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 534.5mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 209.5mm taller than the Acer G247HYL (377.4mmmm), 172.9mm taller than the DELL U2412M (377.4mmmm) and 157.1mm taller than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (377.4mmmm).
Wider Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 561.6mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 21.6mm wider than the Acer G247HYL (562.2mmmm), 5.6mm wider than the DELL U2412M (562.2mmmm) and 0.60000000000002mm narrower than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (562.2mmmm).
More expensive by $32
The Asus VS24 is $32 more expensive than the Acer G247HYL.
Older by over two years
The Asus VS24 is 22 months older than the Acer G247HYL and two years older than the HP EliteDisplay E242.
Expert review Rating is a little Worse
The Asus VS24's average expert score is 80%, however the DELL U2412M's is 82% (based on 36 reviews).
User review Rating is a little Worse
The Asus VS24's average user score is 90%, however the DELL U2412M's is 93% (based on 480 reviews).
12 Reasons Against
0.1" smaller screen size Edit
The DELL U2412M has a screen size of 24"" (as does the HP EliteDisplay E242), however the Acer G247HYL is a 23.8"" PC monitor (0.2" smaller) and the Asus VS24 is a 24.1"" PC monitor (0.1" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A bit smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2412M has a display diagonal of 60.96cmcm (as does the HP EliteDisplay E242), however the Acer G247HYL is a 60.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.46cm smaller) and the Asus VS24 is a 61.13cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.17cm bigger).
50% slower response time Edit
The DELL U2412M is an 8msms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Acer G247HYL (7msms), 3ms slower than the Asus VS24 (7msms) and 1ms slower than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (7msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

31% lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 115mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 35mm lower than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (150mmmm).
A lot higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2412M has a maximum power consumption of 72WW, however the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 38WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (34W lower).
35% heavier Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 4kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.4g heavier than the Acer G247HYL (4.2kgg), 2.1g lighter than the Asus VS24 (4.2kgg) and 0.2g lighter than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (4.2kgg).
36.6mm taller Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 361.6mmmm tall PC monitor, whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 325mmmm tall PC monitor (36.6mm shorter), the Asus VS24 is a 534.5mmmm tall PC monitor (172.9mm taller) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 377.4mmmm tall PC monitor (15.8mm taller).
36% deeper Edit
The DELL U2412M has a depth of 64.9mmmm. That's 23.2mm deeper than the Acer G247HYL (50mmmm), 159.9mm shallower than the Asus VS24 (50mmmm) and 14.9mm deeper than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (50mmmm).
Moderately wider Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 556mmmm wide PC monitor, whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 540mmmm wide PC monitor (16mm narrower), the Asus VS24 is a 561.6mmmm wide PC monitor (5.6mm wider) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 562.2mmmm wide PC monitor (6.2mm wider).
$251 more expensive
The DELL U2412M is more expensive than the Acer G247HYL by $251.01, more expensive than the Asus VS24 by $219.01 and more expensive than the HP EliteDisplay E242 by $101.30.
Less retailers
Only 1 shop sell the DELL U2412M, whereas 10 shops sell the Acer G247HYL, 13 stores sell the Asus VS24 and 8 shops sell the HP EliteDisplay E242. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Over three years older
The DELL U2412M is older than the Acer G247HYL by three years, older than the Asus VS24 by eleven months and older than the HP EliteDisplay E242 by three years.
13 Reasons Against
1% smaller screen size Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 24"" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 0.2" bigger than the Acer G247HYL (24"") and 0.1" smaller than the Asus VS24 (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 0.46cm bigger than the Acer G247HYL (60.96cmcm) and 0.17cm smaller than the Asus VS24 (60.96cmcm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the Acer G247HYL. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
A lot slower response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a response time of 7msms, whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 4msms response time PC monitor (3ms faster), the Asus VS24 is a 5msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster) and the DELL U2412M is an 8msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only three USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the HP EliteDisplay E242 is three, but the DELL U2412M only has five USB 2.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Acer G247HYL or the Asus VS24. It is possible that they do not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Three less USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has two USB Type-A downstream ports, however the DELL U2412M only has five USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Acer G247HYL or the Asus VS24. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 30kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 1kWh higher than the Acer G247HYL (30kWhkWh).
A lot heavier Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a weight of 4.2kgg, but the Acer G247HYL is a 2.6kgg weight PC monitor (1.6g lighter), the Asus VS24 is a 6.1kgg weight PC monitor (1.9g heavier) and the DELL U2412M is a 4kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g lighter).
14% taller Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a height of 377.4mmmm. That's 52.4mm taller than the Acer G247HYL (377.4mmmm), 157.1mm shorter than the Asus VS24 (377.4mmmm) and 15.8mm taller than the DELL U2412M (377.4mmmm).
Deeper Edit
HP EliteDisplay E242 is 50mmmm deep, but the Acer G247HYL is a 41.7mmmm deep PC monitor (8.3mm shallower), the Asus VS24 is a 224.8mmmm deep PC monitor (174.8mm deeper) and the DELL U2412M is a 64.9mmmm deep PC monitor (14.9mm deeper).
Wider Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a width of 562.2mmmm. That's 22.2mm wider than the Acer G247HYL (562.2mmmm), 0.60000000000002mm wider than the Asus VS24 (562.2mmmm) and 6.2mm wider than the DELL U2412M (562.2mmmm).
More expensive by $150
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is $149.71 more expensive than the Acer G247HYL and $117.71 more expensive than the Asus VS24.
Not as many stockists
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is only stocked by 8 sellers, however the Acer G247HYL is stocked by 10 stores and the Asus VS24 is stocked by 13 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.

Awards

No awards found No awards found 10 Awards
CNET.com: Editor's Choice
CNET.com.au: Editor's Choice
computertotaal.nl: Editor's Choice
extrahardware.cz: Smart Buy
flatpanels.dk: Top Recommendation
flatpanelshd.com: Highly Recommended
hardware.info: Gold Award
hardwarecanucks.com: Dam Good Value
tomshardware.co.uk: Approved
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

18 months Ago 40 months Ago 51 months Ago 14 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 36.78
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 39.11
Purchase price $ 119.99
Total cost of ownership $ 159.10
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 36.78
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 39.11
Purchase price $ 237.70
Total cost of ownership $ 276.81
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data
0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
23.8" 24.1"
BEST
24" 24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 609.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 324mm 324mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 60
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 80
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.27 x 0.27 0.270 x 0.270 0.27 x 0.27
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
60.5cm 61.13cm
BEST
60.96cm 60.96cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms
BEST
5ms 8ms 7ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 82% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
BEST
3
HDMI Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
BEST
2
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -90 - 90 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm 150mm
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 20 - -5 -4 - 21 -5 - 25
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45 -45 - 45

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When Off
0.45W 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.24W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
25W
BEST
30W 38W 30W
Standby Power Consumption
0.49W
BEST
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
29kWh
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 72W 38W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3048 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 10668 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90 5 - 95
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
2.9kg
BEST
7.8kg 7.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 437mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 174mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 637mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.6kg
BEST
6.2kg 6.2kg
Height With Stand
407mm
BEST
440.9mm 513.5mm 519mm
Depth With Stand
185mm 205.5mm 180.3mm
BEST
189mm
Width With Stand
540mm
BEST
561.6mm 556mm 562.2mm
Weight
2.6kg
BEST
6.1kg 4kg 4.2kg
Height
325mm
BEST
534.5mm 361.6mm 377.4mm
Depth
41.7mm 224.8mm
BEST
64.9mm 50mm
Width
540mm
BEST
561.6mm 556mm 562.2mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB

Other Features

Product Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1pc(s) Unknown - Click to provide data
Placement
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
Colour Temperature
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6500 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback