Asus VS24 vs Benq ZOWIE RL2455 vs DELL U2412M vs Eizo ColorEdge CX240

(102)
(516)
(6)
Asus VS24
Benq ZOWIE RL2455
Eizo ColorEdge CX240

Top Prices

eBay
Standard delivery: $4.77
In stock (33 available)
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
BenQ America
Delivery unknown
In stock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 4 left!
Adorama
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
Standard delivery: $14.95
In stock (19 available)
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
0.1" bigger screen size Edit
The Asus VS24 has a screen size of 24.1"" (as does the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M are both only 24"" PC monitors (0.1" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

95% more display colour count Edit
Asus VS24 is 16.77MM display colours, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 15.77M more than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (1,070MM).
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240. That's 18° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°°).
8° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus VS24 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°° (as do the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus VS24 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m² (as do the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
$80 cheaper
The Asus VS24 is $80.01 cheaper than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455, $92.01 cheaper than the DELL U2412M and $80.01 cheaper than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240.
Available from 10 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
4 Reasons For
3% bigger viewable width Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 531.36mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 12.96mm bigger than the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (518.4mmmm).
7ms faster response time Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a response time of 1msms, however the Asus VS24 is a 5msms response time PC monitor (4ms slower), the DELL U2412M is an 8msms response time PC monitor (7ms slower) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 7.7msms response time PC monitor (6.7ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 only has one HDMI port. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the DELL U2412M. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

Significantly lighter Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a weight of 4.1kgg, whereas the Asus VS24 is a 6.1kgg weight PC monitor (2g heavier), the DELL U2412M is a 4kgg weight PC monitor (0.1g lighter) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 7.1kgg weight PC monitor (3g heavier).
9 Reasons For
A bit bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL U2412M has a viewable height of 324mmmm (as does the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 298.89mmmm viewable height PC monitor (25.11mm smaller).
15.77M more display colour count Edit
DELL U2412M is 16.77MM display colours (as does the Asus VS24), but the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is only a 1,070MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2412M has a vertical viewing angle of 178°° (as do the Asus VS24 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Asus VS24 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240. That's 8° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°°).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Asus VS24 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
Five USB 2.0 ports Edit
The DELL U2412M is a five USB 2.0 port PC monitor, whereas the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 only has four USB 2.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Asus VS24 or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

One more USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL U2412M is five, but the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Asus VS24 or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

37% lower maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 72WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 26W lower than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (98WW).
Eight more awards
The DELL U2412M has 10 awards from expert review sites, but the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has 2 awards.
10 Reasons For
Marginally bigger screen size Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a screen size of 24.1"" (as does the Asus VS24), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M are both only 24"" PC monitors (0.1" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Moderately larger viewable size diagonal Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a viewable size diagonal of 611mmmm, whereas the DELL U2412M is only a 609.6mmmm viewable size diagonal PC monitor (1.4mm smaller).
8% bigger viewable height Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 324mmmm viewable height PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 25.11mm bigger than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (324mmmm).
11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M. That's 18° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°°).
Slightly wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°° (as do the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
0.039999999999999cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a display diagonal of 61cmcm, however the Asus VS24 is only a 61.13cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.13cm bigger) and the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M are both only 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitors (0.039999999999999cm smaller).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m² (as do the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 128mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 13mm higher than the DELL U2412M (128mmmm).
Expert reviews are better
Based on 4 expert reviews, the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has an average review score of 88%, however the Asus VS24 has an average rating of 80% (based on 2 reviews) and the DELL U2412M has an average rating of 82% (based on 36 reviews).
User reviews are better
Based on 2 user reviews, the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has an average review score of 100%, however the Asus VS24 has an average rating of 90% (based on 100 reviews) and the DELL U2412M has an average rating of 93% (based on 480 reviews).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
80% slower response time Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7.7msms), 3ms faster than the DELL U2412M (7.7msms) and 2.7ms faster than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (7.7msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The Asus VS24 is a one HDMI port PC monitor, and so does the Eizo ColorEdge CX240, whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 only has two HDMI ports. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the DELL U2412M. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

35% heavier Edit
The Asus VS24 is a 6.1kgg weight PC monitor. That's 2g heavier than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7.1kgg), 2.1g heavier than the DELL U2412M (7.1kgg) and 1g lighter than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (7.1kgg).
Over two years older
The Asus VS24 is older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by three years.
Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the Asus VS24 is 80%, whereas the average expert rating of the DELL U2412M is 82% (based on 36 reviews) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is 88% (based on 4 reviews).
A lot Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Asus VS24 is 90%, whereas the average user rating of the DELL U2412M is 93% (based on 480 reviews) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is 100% (based on 2 reviews).
8 Reasons Against
1% smaller screen size Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 24"" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 0.1" smaller than the Asus VS24 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (24.1""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

25.11mm smaller viewable height Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a viewable height of 298.89mmmm, whereas the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 are both 324mmmm viewable height PC monitors (25.11mm bigger).
18° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°°, whereas the Asus VS24, the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 are all 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitors (18° wider).
5% narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Asus VS24, the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (178°°).
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 0.17cm smaller than the Asus VS24 (61cmcm) and 0.039999999999999cm smaller than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (61cmcm).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VS24, the DELL U2412M and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
More expensive by $80
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is $80.01 more expensive than the Asus VS24.
Fewer sellers
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only stocked by 6 stores, but the Asus VS24 is stocked by 12 retailers and the DELL U2412M is stocked by 9 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
11 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 24"" PC monitor, and so does the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. That's 0.1" smaller than the Asus VS24 and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (24.1""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable size diagonal Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 609.6mmmm viewable size diagonal PC monitor. That's 1.4mm smaller than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (611mmmm).
Smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor, and so does the Eizo ColorEdge CX240. That's 12.96mm smaller than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (518.4mmmm).
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. That's 0.17cm smaller than the Asus VS24 (61cmcm) and 0.039999999999999cm smaller than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 (61cmcm).
7ms slower response time Edit
The DELL U2412M has a response time of 8msms, however the Asus VS24 is a 5msms response time PC monitor (3ms faster), the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 1msms response time PC monitor (7ms faster) and the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 7.7msms response time PC monitor (0.3ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

12% lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2412M has a maximum height adjustment of 115mmmm, however the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 128mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (13mm higher).
More expensive by $92
The DELL U2412M is $92.01 more expensive than the Asus VS24, $12 more expensive than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and $12 more expensive than the Eizo ColorEdge CX240.
Fewer sellers
The DELL U2412M is only stocked by 9 retailers, but the Asus VS24 is stocked by 12 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Older by over three years
The DELL U2412M is eleven months older than the Asus VS24 and four years older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. The DELL U2412M is the same age as the Eizo ColorEdge CX240.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The average expert rating of the DELL U2412M is 82%, whereas the average expert rating of the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is 88% (based on 4 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The average user rating of the DELL U2412M is 93%, whereas the average user rating of the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is 100% (based on 2 reviews).
12 Reasons Against
A bit smaller viewable width Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a viewable width of 518.4mmmm (as does the DELL U2412M), whereas the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 531.36mmmm viewable width PC monitor (12.96mm bigger).
Significantly less display colour count Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 1,070MM display colours PC monitor. That's 15.77M less than the Asus VS24 and the DELL U2412M (1,070MM).
Slower response time Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 7.7msms response time PC monitor. That's 2.7ms slower than the Asus VS24 (7.7msms), 6.7ms slower than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7.7msms) and 0.3ms faster than the DELL U2412M (7.7msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less USB 2.0 port Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has four USB 2.0 ports, however the DELL U2412M only has five USB 2.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Asus VS24 or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has one HDMI port, and so does the Asus VS24, however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 only has two HDMI ports. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the DELL U2412M. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

Only four USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a four USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2412M only has five USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Asus VS24 or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

26W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has a maximum power consumption of 98WW, however the DELL U2412M is a 72WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (26W lower).
Heavier Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is a 7.1kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1g heavier than the Asus VS24 (7.1kgg), 3g heavier than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7.1kgg) and 3.1g heavier than the DELL U2412M (7.1kgg).
$80 more expensive
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is more expensive than the Asus VS24 by $80.01.
Less retailers
Only 2 retailers sells the Eizo ColorEdge CX240, whereas 12 retailers sell the Asus VS24, 6 sellers sell the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and 9 shops sell the DELL U2412M. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Over three years older
The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is older than the Asus VS24 by eleven months and older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by four years. The Eizo ColorEdge CX240 is the same age as the DELL U2412M.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Eizo ColorEdge CX240 has received 2 awards, the DELL U2412M has received 10 awards.

Awards

No awards found No awards found 10 Awards
CNET.com: Editor's Choice
CNET.com.au: Editor's Choice
computertotaal.nl: Editor's Choice
extrahardware.cz: Smart Buy
flatpanels.dk: Top Recommendation
flatpanelshd.com: Highly Recommended
hardware.info: Gold Award
hardwarecanucks.com: Dam Good Value
tomshardware.co.uk: Approved
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
2 Awards
Ephotozine: Recommended
reviewed.com: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

40 months Ago 6 months Ago 51 months Ago 51 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 36.78
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 39.11
Purchase price $ 118.99
Total cost of ownership $ 158.10
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data No data No data

Display

Screen Size
24.1"
BEST
24" 24" 24.1"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080i
 576i
 576p
 480i
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080i
 576i
 576p
 480i
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080i
 576i
 576p
 480i
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080i
 576i
 576p
 480i
BEST
Product Type
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 23.75 - 61
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 15 - 68
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 609.6mm 611mm
BEST
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 298.89mm 324mm
BEST
324mm
BEST
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 531.36mm
BEST
518.4mm 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 61 50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data 47.5 - 61
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data 26 - 78
Pixel Pitch
0.27 x 0.27 0.276 x 0.276 0.270 x 0.270 0.270 x 0.270
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
BEST
1,070M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
61.13cm 60.96cm 60.96cm 61cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms 1ms
BEST
8ms 7.7ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 82% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:9
BEST
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
BEST
 16:10
 16:9
BEST
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
BEST
4
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-I Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Port
1 1 1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 1 1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
BEST
4
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 4W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -90 - 90 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm 128mm
BEST
Tilt Angle
20 - -5 -5 - 15 -4 - 21 0 - 30
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45 -172 - 172
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 17
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 9

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
30W 20W
BEST
38W 38W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 72W
BEST
98W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3048 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 10668 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 90 5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 90 10 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 40 0 - 40 0 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
7.8kg 5.7kg
BEST
7.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
437mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
174mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
637mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
4.6kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.2kg 9.9kg
Height With Stand
440.9mm 435mm
BEST
513.5mm 545mm
Depth With Stand
205.5mm 189mm 180.3mm
BEST
245.5mm
Width With Stand
561.6mm 579mm 556mm
BEST
575mm
Weight
6.1kg 4.1kg
BEST
4kg 7.1kg
Height
534.5mm 350mm 361.6mm 398mm
Depth
224.8mm 63mm 64.9mm 75mm
Width
561.6mm 579mm 556mm 575mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort

Other Features

Product Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1pc(s) Unknown - Click to provide data
Placement
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
Colour Temperature
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6500 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback