Acer G247HYL vs Benq ZOWIE RL2455 vs DELL U2412M vs HP EliteDisplay E242

(516)
Acer G247HYL
Benq ZOWIE RL2455
HP EliteDisplay E242

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
eBay
Standard delivery: $4.77
In stock (33 available)
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
BenQ America
Delivery unknown
In stock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 4 left!
Adorama
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
B&H Photo
In stock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
A bit lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer G247HYL has an annual energy consumption of 29kWhkWh, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 30kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (1kWh higher).
62% lighter Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 2.6kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.5g lighter than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (4.2kgg), 1.4g lighter than the DELL U2412M (4.2kgg) and 1.6g lighter than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (4.2kgg).
Available from 5 shops
The more stores stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
5 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 24"" PC monitor, and so do the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 0.2" bigger than the Acer G247HYL (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger viewable width Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 531.36mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 12.96mm bigger than the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (518.4mmmm).
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so do the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 0.46cm bigger than the Acer G247HYL (60.96cmcm).
Hugely faster response time Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a response time of 1msms, but the Acer G247HYL is a 4msms response time PC monitor (3ms slower), the DELL U2412M is an 8msms response time PC monitor (7ms slower) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7msms response time PC monitor (6ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has two HDMI ports, however the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has one HDMI port. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the DELL U2412M. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

8 Reasons For
1% bigger screen size Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 24"" PC monitor, and so do the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 0.2" bigger than the Acer G247HYL (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

25.11mm bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL U2412M has a viewable height of 324mmmm (as does the HP EliteDisplay E242), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 298.89mmmm viewable height PC monitor (25.11mm smaller).
11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2412M has a vertical viewing angle of 178°° (as does the HP EliteDisplay E242), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 8° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°°).
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so do the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 0.46cm bigger than the Acer G247HYL (60.96cmcm).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Acer G247HYL, the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Five USB 2.0 ports Edit
The DELL U2412M has five USB 2.0 ports, however the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has three USB 2.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Acer G247HYL or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Three more USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The DELL U2412M is a five USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Acer G247HYL or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

9 Reasons For
A little bigger screen size Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a screen size of 24"" (as do the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M), but the Acer G247HYL is only a 23.8"" PC monitor (0.2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

8% bigger viewable height Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 324mmmm viewable height PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 25.11mm bigger than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (324mmmm).
Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2412M. That's 18° wider than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (178°°).
A bit wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°° (as does the DELL U2412M), but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
0.46cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a display diagonal of 60.96cmcm (as do the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the DELL U2412M), but the Acer G247HYL is only a 60.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.46cm smaller).
35mm higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 35mm higher than the DELL U2412M (150mmmm).
Significantly lower power consumption when off Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a power consumption when off of 0.24WW, whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 0.45WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.21W higher).
34W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a maximum power consumption of 38WW, but the DELL U2412M is a 72WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (34W higher).
$5 cheaper
The HP EliteDisplay E242 costs $130.00, whereas the Acer G247HYL is $134.99, the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is $199.00 and the DELL U2412M is $211.00.

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
0.2" smaller screen size Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a screen size of 23.8"", but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455, the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are all 24"" PC monitors (0.2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slightly smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a display diagonal of 60.5cmcm, but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455, the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are all 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitors (0.46cm bigger).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m² (as do the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and the HP EliteDisplay E242), but the DELL U2412M is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
75% slower response time Edit
The Acer G247HYL is a 4msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7msms), 4ms faster than the DELL U2412M (7msms) and 3ms faster than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (7msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Acer G247HYL is one, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242, but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 only has two HDMI ports. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the DELL U2412M. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

0.21W higher power consumption when off Edit
The Acer G247HYL has a power consumption when off of 0.45WW, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 0.24WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.21W lower).
$5 more expensive
The Acer G247HYL is more expensive than the HP EliteDisplay E242 by $4.99.
One year older
The Acer G247HYL is older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by one year and older than the HP EliteDisplay E242 by four months.
7 Reasons Against
A bit smaller viewable height Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a viewable height of 298.89mmmm, however the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are both 324mmmm viewable height PC monitors (25.11mm bigger).
12% narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°°, however the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 are both 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitors (18° wider).
Narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the DELL U2412M and the HP EliteDisplay E242 (178°°).
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Acer G247HYL and the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL U2412M (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
1.5g heavier Edit
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 has a weight of 4.1kgg, however the Acer G247HYL is a 2.6kgg weight PC monitor (1.5g lighter), the DELL U2412M is a 4kgg weight PC monitor (0.1g lighter) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kgg weight PC monitor (0.1g heavier).
More expensive by $69
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is $64.01 more expensive than the Acer G247HYL and $69 more expensive than the HP EliteDisplay E242.
Less retailers
The Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is only stocked by 6 retailers, whereas the Acer G247HYL is stocked by 11 stores, the DELL U2412M is stocked by 9 stores and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is stocked by 8 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
8 Reasons Against
3% smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 12.96mm smaller than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (518.4mmmm).
Hugely slower response time Edit
The DELL U2412M has a response time of 8msms, but the Acer G247HYL is a 4msms response time PC monitor (4ms faster), the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 1msms response time PC monitor (7ms faster) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

A lot lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2412M has a maximum height adjustment of 115mmmm, but the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (35mm higher).
Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2412M is a 72WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 34W higher than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (38WW).
A lot heavier Edit
The DELL U2412M has a weight of 4kgg, however the Acer G247HYL is a 2.6kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g lighter), the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor (0.1g heavier) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g heavier).
More expensive by $81
The DELL U2412M is $76.01 more expensive than the Acer G247HYL, $12 more expensive than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and $81 more expensive than the HP EliteDisplay E242.
Less retailers
The DELL U2412M is only stocked by 9 shops, whereas the Acer G247HYL is stocked by 11 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by over three years
The DELL U2412M is three years older than the Acer G247HYL, four years older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 and three years older than the HP EliteDisplay E242.
10 Reasons Against
Marginally smaller viewable width Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a viewable width of 518.4mmmm (as does the DELL U2412M), however the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 is a 531.36mmmm viewable width PC monitor (12.96mm bigger).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m² (as do the Acer G247HYL and the Benq ZOWIE RL2455), but the DELL U2412M is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Acer G247HYL (7msms), 6ms slower than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (7msms) and 1ms faster than the DELL U2412M (7msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two less USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the HP EliteDisplay E242 is three, but the DELL U2412M only has five USB 2.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Acer G247HYL or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the HP EliteDisplay E242 is one, and so does the Acer G247HYL, but the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 only has two HDMI ports. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the DELL U2412M. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

Only two USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has two USB Type-A downstream ports, however the DELL U2412M only has five USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Acer G247HYL or the Benq ZOWIE RL2455. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

1kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has an annual energy consumption of 30kWhkWh, whereas the Acer G247HYL is a 29kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (1kWh lower).
Heavier Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.6g heavier than the Acer G247HYL (4.2kgg), 0.1g heavier than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 (4.2kgg) and 0.2g heavier than the DELL U2412M (4.2kgg).
Not as many stockists
Only 8 retailers sells the HP EliteDisplay E242, however 11 sellers sell the Acer G247HYL and 9 sellers sell the DELL U2412M. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Eight months older
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is older than the Benq ZOWIE RL2455 by eight months.

Awards

No awards found No awards found 10 Awards
CNET.com: Editor's Choice
CNET.com.au: Editor's Choice
computertotaal.nl: Editor's Choice
extrahardware.cz: Smart Buy
flatpanels.dk: Top Recommendation
flatpanelshd.com: Highly Recommended
hardware.info: Gold Award
hardwarecanucks.com: Dam Good Value
tomshardware.co.uk: Approved
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

18 months Ago 6 months Ago 51 months Ago 15 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 36.78
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 39.11
Purchase price $ 130.00
Total cost of ownership $ 169.11
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data
0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
23.8" 24"
BEST
24"
BEST
24"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 609.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 298.89mm 324mm
BEST
324mm
BEST
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 531.36mm
BEST
518.4mm 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 60
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 80
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.276 x 0.276 0.270 x 0.270 0.27 x 0.27
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
60.5cm 60.96cm
BEST
60.96cm
BEST
60.96cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms 1ms
BEST
8ms 7ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 82% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
BEST
3
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
BEST
2
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 4W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -90 - 90 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm 150mm
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -5 - 15 -4 - 21 -5 - 25
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45 -45 - 45
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 17 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When Off
0.45W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.24W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
25W 20W
BEST
38W 30W
Standby Power Consumption
0.49W
BEST
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
29kWh
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 72W 38W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3048 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 10668 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 90 5 - 90 5 - 95
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 90 10 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 40 0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
2.9kg
BEST
5.7kg 7.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6.2kg 6.2kg
Height With Stand
407mm
BEST
435mm 513.5mm 519mm
Depth With Stand
185mm 189mm 180.3mm
BEST
189mm
Width With Stand
540mm
BEST
579mm 556mm 562.2mm
Weight
2.6kg
BEST
4.1kg 4kg 4.2kg
Height
325mm 350mm 361.6mm 377.4mm
Depth
41.7mm 63mm 64.9mm 50mm
Width
540mm 579mm 556mm 562.2mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 USB

Other Features

Product Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1pc(s) Unknown - Click to provide data
Placement
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
Colour Temperature
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6500 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback