DELL 2714H vs HP 27er vs HP EliteDisplay E271i vs HP V272

(120)
(77)
(11)
DELL 2714H
HP EliteDisplay E271i
HP V272

Top Prices

No prices found
eBay
In stock, only 4 left!
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
crazyscientist
Delivery unknown
In stock, only 4 left!
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
In stock (182 available)
Overstock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 6 left!
Overstock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock (490 available)

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL 2714H is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.019999999999996cm bigger than the HP 27er ().
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL 2714H is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP 27er (250 cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP V272 (250 cd/m²).
64% lower maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL 2714H is a 22WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 7W lower than the HP 27er (36W) and 14W lower than the HP V272 (36W).
2 Reasons For
One more HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the HP 27er is two, but the DELL 2714H only has one HDMI port and the HP V272 only has one HDMI port. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the HP EliteDisplay E271i. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

5.3kg lighter Edit
The HP 27er has a weight of 3.4kgg, but the DELL 2714H is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor (1.2g heavier) and the HP V272 is a 5.3kg weight PC monitor (5.3kg heavier).
3 Reasons For
Available from 4 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Expert reviews are a lot better
The HP EliteDisplay E271i has an average expert review score of 80%, whereas the DELL 2714H has an average rating of 70% (based on 2 reviews).
User reviews are better
The HP EliteDisplay E271i has an average user review score of 100%, whereas the DELL 2714H has an average rating of 86% (based on 118 reviews) and the HP 27er has an average rating of 91% (based on 77 reviews).
2 Reasons For
1ms faster response time Edit
The HP V272 has a response time of 7ms, whereas the DELL 2714H is an 8msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower) and the HP 27er is a 7msms response time PC monitor (0ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Cheaper by $6
The HP V272 costs $178.99, whereas the HP 27er is $185.00 and the HP EliteDisplay E271i is $259.99.

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The DELL 2714H has a response time of 8msms, but the HP 27er is a 7msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster) and the HP V272 is a 7ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The DELL 2714H has one HDMI port (as does the HP V272), however the HP 27er only has two HDMI ports. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the HP EliteDisplay E271i. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

1.2g heavier Edit
The DELL 2714H has a weight of 4.6kgg, however the HP 27er is a 3.4kgg weight PC monitor (1.2g lighter) and the HP V272 is a 5.3kg weight PC monitor (5.3kg heavier).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by over two years
The DELL 2714H is three years older than the HP 27er, 19 months older than the HP EliteDisplay E271i and 21 months older than the HP V272.
Expert review Rating is much Worse
The DELL 2714H's average expert score is only 70%, however the HP EliteDisplay E271i's is 80% (based on 6 reviews).
User review Rating is much Worse
The DELL 2714H's average user score is 86%, however the HP 27er's is 91% (based on 77 reviews) and the HP EliteDisplay E271i's is 100% (based on 5 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP 27er is a 68.58cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.019999999999996cm smaller than the DELL 2714H ().
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP 27er is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL 2714H (250 cd/m²) and 0 cd/m² dimmer than the HP V272 (250 cd/m²).
Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP 27er is a 29WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 7W higher than the DELL 2714H (36W) and 7W lower than the HP V272 (36W).
More expensive by $6
The HP 27er is $6.01 more expensive than the HP V272.
Not as many stockists
The HP 27er is only stocked by 4 retailers, however the HP EliteDisplay E271i is stocked by 8 retailers and the HP V272 is stocked by 6 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
User review Rating is Worse
The HP 27er has an average user score of 91%, but the HP EliteDisplay E271i has an average user rating of 100% (based on 5 reviews).
2 Reasons Against
$81 more expensive
The HP EliteDisplay E271i is more expensive than the HP 27er by $74.99 and more expensive than the HP V272 by $81.
Over one year older
The HP EliteDisplay E271i is older than the HP 27er by 16 months and older than the HP V272 by two months.
6 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP V272 is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL 2714H (250 cd/m²) and 0 cd/m² dimmer than the HP 27er (250 cd/m²).
One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the HP V272 is one (as does the DELL 2714H), but the HP 27er only has two HDMI ports. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the HP EliteDisplay E271i. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP V272 is a 36W maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 14W higher than the DELL 2714H (36W) and 7W higher than the HP 27er (36W).
Heavier Edit
The HP V272 has a weight of 5.3kg, but the DELL 2714H is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor (5.3kg lighter) and the HP 27er is a 3.4kgg weight PC monitor (5.3kg lighter).
Not as many stockists
The HP V272 is only stocked by 6 stores, however the HP EliteDisplay E271i is stocked by 8 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by over one year
The HP V272 is 14 months older than the HP 27er.

Awards

No awards found No awards found 1 Award
hardware.info: Bronze Award
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

38 months Ago 4 months Ago 19 months Ago 17 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 29.37
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.09
Total running cost $ 31.46
Purchase price $ 178.99
Total cost of ownership $ 210.45
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data
No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data
0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27" 27"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
BEST
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
BEST
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
BEST
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
 Full HD
BEST
Viewable Height
336.3mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
597.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.3114 x 0.3114 0.311 x 0.311 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
68.6cm
BEST
68.58cm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² Unknown - Click to provide data 250 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 7ms Unknown - Click to provide data 7ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
BEST
 16:9
BEST
 16:9
 16:9
BEST
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
115mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 25 Unknown - Click to provide data -3 - 21

Power

Input Current
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.14W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
43W 24W Unknown - Click to provide data 24W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W 0.2W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.45W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 34kWh Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Average Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 24W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption
22W
BEST
29W Unknown - Click to provide data 36W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
9.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 3.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
539mm 455.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data 434.2mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
204mm 194.5mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 200mm
Width With Stand
641.4mm 620.9mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 622.3mm
Weight
4.6kg 3.4kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.3kg
Height
379.9mm 371.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data 370.3mm
Depth
46.1mm 35.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data 44.8mm
Width
641.4mm 620.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data 622.3mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
Feedback