DELL 2714H vs HP 27er vs HP V272

(120)
(77)
DELL 2714H
HP V272

Top Prices

No prices found
eBay
In stock, only 4 left!
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
crazyscientist
Delivery unknown
In stock, only 4 left!
eBay
In stock, only 6 left!
Overstock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock (490 available)

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
0.019999999999996cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL 2714H has a display diagonal of 68.6cmcm, whereas the HP 27er is only a 68.58cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.019999999999996cm smaller).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL 2714H has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the HP 27er is only a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer) and the HP V272 is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
14W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL 2714H has a maximum power consumption of 22WW, whereas the HP 27er is a 29WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (7W higher) and the HP V272 is a 36W maximum power consumption PC monitor (14W higher).
3 Reasons For
Two HDMI ports Edit
The HP 27er has two HDMI ports, however the DELL 2714H only has one HDMI port and the HP V272 only has one HDMI port.
Lighter Edit
The HP 27er is a 3.4kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.2g lighter than the DELL 2714H (5.3kg) and 5.3kg lighter than the HP V272 (5.3kg).
User reviews are better
Based on 77 user reviews, the HP 27er has an average review score of 91%, however the DELL 2714H has an average rating of 86% (based on 118 reviews).
3 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The HP V272 is a 7ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the DELL 2714H (7ms) and 0ms faster than the HP 27er (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$6 cheaper
The HP V272 costs $6.01 less than the HP 27er.
Available from 2 shops
A greater number of stores increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
13% slower response time Edit
The DELL 2714H is an 8msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the HP 27er (7ms) and 1ms slower than the HP V272 (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The DELL 2714H is a one HDMI port PC monitor, and so does the HP V272, whereas the HP 27er only has two HDMI ports.
Heavier Edit
The DELL 2714H is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.2g heavier than the HP 27er (5.3kg) and 5.3kg lighter than the HP V272 (5.3kg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Over two years older
The DELL 2714H is older than the HP 27er by three years and older than the HP V272 by 21 months.
Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the DELL 2714H is 86%, whereas the average user rating of the HP 27er is 91% (based on 77 reviews).
5 Reasons Against
0.019999999999996cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP 27er has a display diagonal of 68.58cmcm, however the DELL 2714H is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.019999999999996cm bigger).
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP 27er has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m², however the DELL 2714H is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter) and the HP V272 is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (0 cd/m² brighter).
25% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP 27er has a maximum power consumption of 29WW, however the DELL 2714H is a 22WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (7W lower) and the HP V272 is a 36W maximum power consumption PC monitor (7W higher).
$6 more expensive
The HP 27er is more expensive than the HP V272 by $6.01.
Less retailers
Only 4 stores sells the HP 27er, whereas 6 retailers sell the HP V272. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
5 Reasons Against
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP V272 has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², however the DELL 2714H is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter) and the HP 27er is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (0 cd/m² brighter).
Only one HDMI port Edit
The HP V272 has one HDMI port, and so does the DELL 2714H, however the HP 27er only has two HDMI ports.
A lot higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP V272 has a maximum power consumption of 36W, however the DELL 2714H is a 22WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (14W lower) and the HP 27er is a 29WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (7W lower).
Vastly heavier Edit
The HP V272 is a 5.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 5.3kg heavier than the DELL 2714H (5.3kg) and 5.3kg heavier than the HP 27er (5.3kg).
Over one year older
The HP V272 is older than the HP 27er by 14 months.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

38 months Ago 4 months Ago 17 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 29.37
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.09
Total running cost $ 31.46
Purchase price $ 178.99
Total cost of ownership $ 210.45
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data
No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data
0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Height
336.3mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
597.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.3114 x 0.3114 0.311 x 0.311 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm
BEST
68.58cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 7ms 7ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
1
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
115mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 25 -3 - 21

Power

Input Current
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.14W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
43W 24W 24W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W 0.2W
BEST
0.45W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 34kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Average Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 24W Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption
22W
BEST
29W 36W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 20 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 5 - 35 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
9.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 3.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
539mm 455.6mm 434.2mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
204mm 194.5mm
BEST
200mm
Width With Stand
641.4mm 620.9mm
BEST
622.3mm
Weight
4.6kg 3.4kg
BEST
5.3kg
Height
379.9mm 371.6mm 370.3mm
Depth
46.1mm 35.6mm 44.8mm
Width
641.4mm 620.9mm 622.3mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
Feedback