DELL 2714H vs HP 27er vs HP 27vx vs LG 27MC37HQ-B

(120)
(77)
DELL 2714H
HP 27vx
LG 27MC37HQ-B

Top Prices

Amazon US
Out of stock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
Newegg UK
eBay
In stock (87 available)
Antonline
Delivery unknown
In stock (105 available)

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL 2714H is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.019999999999996cm bigger than the HP 27er ().
34% brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL 2714H is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP 27er (200 cd/m² cd/m²), 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP 27vx (200 cd/m² cd/m²) and 100 cd/m² brighter than the LG 27MC37HQ-B (200 cd/m² cd/m²).
Lower maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL 2714H is a 22WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 7W lower than the HP 27er () and 13W lower than the HP 27vx ().
6 Reasons For
One more HDMI port Edit
The HP 27er is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the LG 27MC37HQ-B only has one HDMI port and the HP 27vx only has one HDMI port.
0.16W lower power consumption when off Edit
The HP 27er is a 0.14WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.16W lower than the LG 27MC37HQ-B (0.3WW).
Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The HP 27er is a 34kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 3kWh lower than the HP 27vx ().
3W lower average power consumption Edit
The HP 27er is a 24WW average power consumption PC monitor. That's 3W lower than the LG 27MC37HQ-B (27WW).
Significantly lighter Edit
The HP 27er has a weight of 3.4kgg, whereas the DELL 2714H is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor (1.2g heavier), the HP 27vx is a 4.2kg weight PC monitor (4.2kg heavier) and the LG 27MC37HQ-B is a 4.5kgg weight PC monitor (1.1g heavier).
Better user reviews
The average user review score of the HP 27er is 91% based on 77 reviews, whereas the average rating of the DELL 2714H is 86% (based on 118 reviews).
2 Reasons For
1ms faster response time Edit
The HP 27vx has a response time of 7ms, whereas the DELL 2714H is an 8msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower) and the HP 27er is a 7msms response time PC monitor (0ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$122.29 cheaper to run
Over five years the HP 27vx only costs $41.49 to run whereas the LG 27MC37HQ-B costs $163.78 to run (295% more). Read more
2 Reasons For
Cheaper by $20
The LG 27MC37HQ-B is $170 cheaper than the DELL 2714H and $20.01 cheaper than the HP 27er.
10 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
1ms slower response time Edit
The DELL 2714H has a response time of 8msms, whereas the HP 27er is a 7msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster) and the HP 27vx is a 7ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL 2714H is one (as do the HP 27vx and the LG 27MC37HQ-B), but the HP 27er only has two HDMI ports.
A lot heavier Edit
The DELL 2714H has a weight of 4.6kgg, but the HP 27er is a 3.4kgg weight PC monitor (1.2g lighter), the HP 27vx is a 4.2kg weight PC monitor (4.2kg heavier) and the LG 27MC37HQ-B is a 4.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.1g lighter).
More expensive by $170
The DELL 2714H is $149.99 more expensive than the HP 27er and $170 more expensive than the LG 27MC37HQ-B.
Not as many stockists
The DELL 2714H is only stocked by 2 shops, however the HP 27er is stocked by 6 shops and the LG 27MC37HQ-B is stocked by 11 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by over two years
The DELL 2714H is three years older than the HP 27er, 20 months older than the HP 27vx and 16 months older than the LG 27MC37HQ-B.
User review Rating is Worse
The DELL 2714H has an average user score of 86%, but the HP 27er has an average user rating of 91% (based on 77 reviews).
5 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP 27er is a 68.58cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.019999999999996cm smaller than the DELL 2714H ().
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP 27er is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL 2714H (200 cd/m² cd/m²), 0 cd/m² dimmer than the HP 27vx (200 cd/m² cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² brighter than the LG 27MC37HQ-B (200 cd/m² cd/m²).
7W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP 27er is a 29WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 7W higher than the DELL 2714H () and 6W lower than the HP 27vx ().
More expensive by $20
The HP 27er is $20.01 more expensive than the LG 27MC37HQ-B.
Fewer sellers
The HP 27er is only stocked by 6 sellers, but the LG 27MC37HQ-B is stocked by 11 shops. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
7 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP 27vx is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL 2714H (200 cd/m² cd/m²), 0 cd/m² dimmer than the HP 27er (200 cd/m² cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² brighter than the LG 27MC37HQ-B (200 cd/m² cd/m²).
One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the HP 27vx is one (as do the DELL 2714H and the LG 27MC37HQ-B), but the HP 27er only has two HDMI ports.
9% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The HP 27vx is a 37kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 3kWh higher than the HP 27er ().
38% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP 27vx is a 35W maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 13W higher than the DELL 2714H () and 6W higher than the HP 27er ().
Heavier Edit
The HP 27vx has a weight of 4.2kg, but the DELL 2714H is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor (4.2kg lighter), the HP 27er is a 3.4kgg weight PC monitor (4.2kg lighter) and the LG 27MC37HQ-B is a 4.5kgg weight PC monitor (4.2kg lighter).
Not as many stockists
The HP 27vx is only stocked by 1 store, however the DELL 2714H is stocked by 2 stores, the HP 27er is stocked by 6 retailers and the LG 27MC37HQ-B is stocked by 11 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by over one year
The HP 27vx is 15 months older than the HP 27er.
7 Reasons Against
50% dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 27MC37HQ-B is a 200 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 100 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL 2714H (200 cd/m² cd/m²), 50 cd/m² dimmer than the HP 27er (200 cd/m² cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² dimmer than the HP 27vx (200 cd/m² cd/m²).
One less HDMI port Edit
The LG 27MC37HQ-B is a one HDMI port PC monitor (as do the DELL 2714H and the HP 27vx), whereas the HP 27er only has two HDMI ports.
54% higher power consumption when off Edit
The LG 27MC37HQ-B is a 0.3WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.16W higher than the HP 27er (0.3WW).
3W higher average power consumption Edit
The LG 27MC37HQ-B is a 27WW average power consumption PC monitor. That's 3W higher than the HP 27er (27WW).
1.1g heavier Edit
The LG 27MC37HQ-B has a weight of 4.5kgg, whereas the DELL 2714H is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor (0.1g heavier), the HP 27er is a 3.4kgg weight PC monitor (1.1g lighter) and the HP 27vx is a 4.2kg weight PC monitor (4.2kg heavier).
Older by over one year
The LG 27MC37HQ-B is 19 months older than the HP 27er and four months older than the HP 27vx.
Higher running costs over five years by $122.29
Over five years the LG 27MC37HQ-B costs $163.78 to run which is $122.29 more to run than the HP 27vx. Show assumptions.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

38 months Ago 4 months Ago 19 months Ago 23 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 39.16
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 41.49
Electricity cost - switched on $ 38.00
Electricity cost - standby $ 125.78
Total running cost $ 163.78
Purchase price $ 159.99
Total cost of ownership $ 323.77
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data
No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data
0.27T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.27 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1.1T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 1.1 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
27
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27"
BEST
27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Viewable Height
336.3mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 336.3mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
597.9mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.3114 x 0.3114 0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 0.3114 x 0.3114
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm
BEST
68.58cm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 200 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 7ms 7ms
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 68%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
1 1
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
115mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 25 -5 - 25 -5 - 20
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (SIMPL)
 GRE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 CHI (SIMPL)
 GRE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 CHI (SIMPL)
 GRE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 CHI (SIMPL)
 GRE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
BEST

Power

Input Current
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.14W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
43W 24W
BEST
32W 31W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W 0.2W
BEST
0.5W 27W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 34kWh
BEST
37kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Average Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 24W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 27W
Maximum Power Consumption
22W
BEST
29W 35W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 20 - 80 20 - 70 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 5 - 35 5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
9.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5.9kg
BEST
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 132.1mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 467.3mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 711.2mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 3.8kg
BEST
5.3kg 4.8kg
Height With Stand
539mm 455.6mm 454mm 210.82mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
204mm 194.5mm 192mm
BEST
487.68mm
Width With Stand
641.4mm 620.9mm
BEST
622mm 640.08mm
Weight
4.6kg 3.4kg
BEST
4.2kg 4.5kg
Height
379.9mm 371.6mm 383mm 48.26mm
Depth
46.1mm 35.6mm 38mm 391.16mm
Width
641.4mm 620.9mm 622mm 640.08mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
Feedback