HP 27er vs HP 27xw vs LG 27MP37 vs LG 27MP67

(77)
(6)
(5)
HP 27xw
LG 27MP37
LG 27MP67

Top Prices

eBay
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
eBay
In stock, only 5 left!
Amazon US
Delivery unknown
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
Brighter display brightness Edit
The HP 27er has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m² (as do the HP 27xw and the LG 27MP67), but the LG 27MP37 is only a 200 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the HP 27er is two, and so does the HP 27xw, but the LG 27MP67 only has one HDMI port.
Lower power consumption when off Edit
The HP 27er has a power consumption when off of 0.14WW, whereas the LG 27MP37 is a 0.2WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.06W higher) and the LG 27MP67 is a 0.3WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.16W higher).
Significantly lower annual energy consumption Edit
The HP 27er has an annual energy consumption of 34kWhkWh, whereas the HP 27xw is a 39kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (5kWh higher), the LG 27MP37 is a 43kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (9kWh higher) and the LG 27MP67 is a 94kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (60kWh higher).
Lower maximum power consumption Edit
The HP 27er has a maximum power consumption of 29WW, but the HP 27xw is a 32WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (3W higher).
33% lighter Edit
The HP 27er is a 3.4kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.9g lighter than the HP 27xw and the LG 27MP67 (4.3kgg) and 1.1g lighter than the LG 27MP37 (4.3kgg).
Available from 2 shops
The more stores stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
4 Reasons For
Bigger viewable height Edit
The HP 27xw has a viewable height of 336.31mmmm, but the LG 27MP37 is only a 293.88mmmm viewable height PC monitor (42.43mm smaller).
Bigger viewable width Edit
The HP 27xw is a 597.89mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 45.43mm bigger than the LG 27MP37 ().
Brighter display brightness Edit
The HP 27xw is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the HP 27er and the LG 27MP67. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the LG 27MP37 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
One more HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the HP 27xw is two (as does the HP 27er), but the LG 27MP67 only has one HDMI port.
2 Reasons For
$6 cheaper
The LG 27MP37 is $6.01 cheaper than the HP 27er and $20.76 cheaper than the HP 27xw.
User reviews are marginally better
Based on 4 reviews, the LG 27MP37 has an average user review score of 100%, whereas the HP 27er has an average rating of 91% (based on 77 reviews), the HP 27xw has an average rating of 89% (based on 13 reviews) and the LG 27MP67 has an average rating of 96% (based on 5 reviews).
3 Reasons For
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The LG 27MP67 is a 69cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.42cm bigger than the HP 27er, the HP 27xw and the LG 27MP37 (69cmcm).
20% brighter display brightness Edit
The LG 27MP67 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the HP 27er and the HP 27xw. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the LG 27MP37 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Significantly lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The LG 27MP67 has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 0.3WW, whereas the LG 27MP37 is a 27WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (26.7W higher).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
A bit smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP 27er has a display diagonal of 68.58cmcm (as do the HP 27xw and the LG 27MP37), but the LG 27MP67 is a 69cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.42cm bigger).
29% slower response time Edit
The HP 27er is a 7msms response time PC monitor. That's 7ms faster than the HP 27xw (5msms) and 2ms slower than the LG 27MP37 and the LG 27MP67 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$6 more expensive
The HP 27er is more expensive than the LG 27MP37 by $6.01.
Lower user review Score
The HP 27er has an average user rating of 91%, but the LG 27MP37 has an average user rating of 100% (based on 4 reviews) and the LG 27MP67 has an average user rating of 96% (based on 5 reviews).
8 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP 27xw is a 68.58cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so do the HP 27er and the LG 27MP37. That's 0.42cm smaller than the LG 27MP67 (69cmcm).
5kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The HP 27xw is a 39kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 5kWh higher than the HP 27er (94kWhkWh), 4kWh lower than the LG 27MP37 (94kWhkWh) and 55kWh lower than the LG 27MP67 (94kWhkWh).
10% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP 27xw is a 32WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 3W higher than the HP 27er ().
Heavier Edit
The HP 27xw has a weight of 4.3kgg (as does the LG 27MP67), but the HP 27er is a 3.4kgg weight PC monitor (0.9g lighter) and the LG 27MP37 is a 4.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g heavier).
More expensive by $21
The HP 27xw is $14.75 more expensive than the HP 27er and $20.76 more expensive than the LG 27MP37.
Not as many stockists
The HP 27xw is only stocked by 4 retailers, however the HP 27er is stocked by 6 shops and the LG 27MP37 is stocked by 5 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by over one year
The HP 27xw is 13 months older than the HP 27er.
User review Rating is much Worse
The HP 27xw has an average user score of 89%, but the HP 27er has an average user rating of 91% (based on 77 reviews), the LG 27MP37 has an average user rating of 100% (based on 4 reviews) and the LG 27MP67 has an average user rating of 96% (based on 5 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
42.43mm smaller viewable height Edit
The LG 27MP37 is a 293.88mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 42.43mm smaller than the HP 27xw ().
A bit smaller viewable width Edit
The LG 27MP37 has a viewable width of 552.46mmmm, but the HP 27xw is a 597.89mmmm viewable width PC monitor (45.43mm bigger).
0.42cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 27MP37 has a display diagonal of 68.58cmcm (as do the HP 27er and the HP 27xw), whereas the LG 27MP67 is a 69cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.42cm bigger).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 27MP37 has a display brightness of 200 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the HP 27er, the HP 27xw and the LG 27MP67 are all 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² brighter).
Only one HDMI port Edit
The LG 27MP37 is a one HDMI port PC monitor, and so does the LG 27MP67, whereas the HP 27xw only has two HDMI ports.
Higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The LG 27MP37 is a 27WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 26.7W higher than the LG 27MP67 (0.3WW).
A lot higher power consumption when off Edit
The LG 27MP37 has a power consumption when off of 0.2WW, however the HP 27er is a 0.14WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.06W lower) and the LG 27MP67 is a 0.3WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.1W higher).
21% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 27MP37 has an annual energy consumption of 43kWhkWh, however the HP 27er is a 34kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (9kWh lower), the HP 27xw is a 39kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (4kWh lower) and the LG 27MP67 is a 94kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (51kWh higher).
1.1g heavier Edit
The LG 27MP37 is a 4.5kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.1g heavier than the HP 27er (4.3kgg) and 0.2g heavier than the HP 27xw and the LG 27MP67 (4.3kgg).
Fewer sellers
Only 5 retailers sells the LG 27MP37, but 6 sellers sell the HP 27er. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Over one year older
The LG 27MP37 is older than the HP 27er by 20 months and older than the HP 27xw by seven months. The LG 27MP37 is the same age as the LG 27MP67.
7 Reasons Against
One less HDMI port Edit
The LG 27MP67 has one HDMI port (as does the LG 27MP37), however the HP 27xw only has two HDMI ports.
Higher power consumption when off Edit
The LG 27MP67 is a 0.3WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.16W higher than the HP 27er (0.3WW) and 0.1W higher than the LG 27MP37 (0.3WW).
64% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 27MP67 is a 94kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 60kWh higher than the HP 27er (94kWhkWh), 55kWh higher than the HP 27xw (94kWhkWh) and 51kWh higher than the LG 27MP37 (94kWhkWh).
21% heavier Edit
The LG 27MP67 has a weight of 4.3kgg (as does the HP 27xw), however the HP 27er is a 3.4kgg weight PC monitor (0.9g lighter) and the LG 27MP37 is a 4.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g heavier).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by over one year
The LG 27MP67 is 20 months older than the HP 27er and seven months older than the HP 27xw. The LG 27MP67 is the same age as the LG 27MP37.
User review Rating is slightly Worse
The LG 27MP67's average user score is 96%, however the LG 27MP37's is 100% (based on 4 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

4 months Ago 17 months Ago 24 months Ago 24 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 336.31mm
BEST
293.88mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.89mm
BEST
552.46mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.58cm 68.58cm 68.58cm 69cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
BEST
200 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
7ms 14ms
BEST
5ms 5ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 68% Unknown - Click to provide data
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
RF Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2
BEST
2
BEST
1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Mean Time Between Failures
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 50,000h Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 -5 - 25 -5 - 20 -3 - 20
Automatic Shut Off
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
On Screen Display Language
 GRE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 GRE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 GRE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 GRE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 17 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 27W 0.3W
BEST
Power Consumption When Off
0.14W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.2W 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
24W
BEST
31W 30W 26W
Standby Power Consumption
0.2W 0.5W 0.3W 0.29W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
34kWh
BEST
39kWh 43kWh 94kWh
Average Power Consumption
24W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption
29W
BEST
32W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 95 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 80 20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
5 - 35 5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 35

Certificates

EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5.9kg
BEST
6.3kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 468mm 442mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 132mm
BEST
154mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 713mm 689mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
3.8kg
BEST
5.6kg 4.8kg 4.6kg
Height With Stand
455.6mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 488mm 470mm
Depth With Stand
194.5mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 212mm 205mm
Width With Stand
620.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data 641mm 614mm
BEST
Weight
3.4kg
BEST
4.3kg 4.5kg 4.3kg
Height
371.6mm 454.6mm 392mm 369mm
Depth
35.6mm 164mm 48.8mm 52mm
Width
620.9mm 622.6mm 641mm 614mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
BEST
Feedback