Acer B346CK vs Acer Predator X34 vs LG 34UM68-P

(19)
(45)
Acer B346CK
Acer Predator X34
LG 34UM68-P

Top Prices

No prices found
Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
Standard delivery: $29.99
BuyDig
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
7% brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 320 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 20 cd/m² brighter than the Acer Predator X34 and the LG 34UM68-P (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
One more HDMI port Edit
The Acer B346CK has two HDMI ports (as does the LG 34UM68-P), however the Acer Predator X34 only has one HDMI port.
Higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer B346CK has a maximum height adjustment of 150mmmm, but the Acer Predator X34 is only a 130mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (20mm lower) and the LG 34UM68-P is only a 120mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (30mm lower).
A lot lighter Edit
The Acer B346CK has a weight of 10.8kgg, however the Acer Predator X34 is a 15kgg weight PC monitor (4.2g heavier) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 6kgg weight PC monitor (4.8g lighter).
2 Reasons For
2ms faster response time Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a response time of 4msms, however the Acer B346CK is a 6msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 5msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

8 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
7 Reasons For
One more HDMI port Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is a two HDMI port PC monitor (as does the Acer B346CK), whereas the Acer Predator X34 only has one HDMI port.
Lower power consumption when off Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is a 0.3WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.2W lower than the Acer B346CK (0.3WW).
61% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is a 58kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 30kWh lower than the Acer B346CK (58kWhkWh) and 35kWh lower than the Acer Predator X34 (58kWhkWh).
67% lower maximum power consumption Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is a 53WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 35W lower than the Acer B346CK (53WW).
Cheaper by $280
The LG 34UM68-P is $280 cheaper than the Acer B346CK and $617.99 cheaper than the Acer Predator X34.
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The LG 34UM68-P has an energy efficiency rating of "B", whereas the Acer B346CK has a rating of "C" and the Acer Predator X34 has a rating of "C".
Significantly better user reviews
Based on 45 reviews, the average user review score of the LG 34UM68-P is 90%, whereas the average rating of the Acer Predator X34 is 64% (based on 5 reviews).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
A lot slower response time Edit
The Acer B346CK has a response time of 6msms, but the Acer Predator X34 is a 4msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 5msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

40% higher power consumption when off Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 0.5WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.2W higher than the LG 34UM68-P (0.3WW).
Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer B346CK is an 88kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 5kWh lower than the Acer Predator X34 (58kWhkWh) and 30kWh higher than the LG 34UM68-P (58kWhkWh).
Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Acer B346CK is an 88WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 35W higher than the LG 34UM68-P (53WW).
More expensive by $280
The Acer B346CK is $280 more expensive than the LG 34UM68-P.
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Lower energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Acer B346CK is "C", however the rating of the Acer Predator X34 is "C" and the rating of the LG 34UM68-P is "B".
9 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the LG 34UM68-P. That's 20 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer B346CK (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
One less HDMI port Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the LG 34UM68-P only has two HDMI ports.
16% lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a maximum height adjustment of 130mmmm, however the Acer B346CK is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (20mm higher) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 120mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (10mm lower).
38% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 93kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 5kWh higher than the Acer B346CK (58kWhkWh) and 35kWh higher than the LG 34UM68-P (58kWhkWh).
9g heavier Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a weight of 15kgg, whereas the Acer B346CK is a 10.8kgg weight PC monitor (4.2g lighter) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 6kgg weight PC monitor (9g lighter).
More expensive by $618
The Acer Predator X34 is $337.99 more expensive than the Acer B346CK and $617.99 more expensive than the LG 34UM68-P.
Older by seven months
The Acer Predator X34 is seven months older than the Acer B346CK and seven months older than the LG 34UM68-P.
Worse energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Acer Predator X34 is "C", whereas the rating of the Acer B346CK is "C" and the rating of the LG 34UM68-P is "B".
User review Rating is significantly Worse
The average user rating of the Acer Predator X34 is only 64%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 34UM68-P is 90% (based on 45 reviews).
5 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is an 86.36cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.040000000000006cm smaller than the Acer B346CK (86.36cmcm) and 0.36cm bigger than the Acer Predator X34 (86.36cmcm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the Acer Predator X34. That's 20 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer B346CK (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
20% slower response time Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has a response time of 5msms, however the Acer B346CK is a 6msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower) and the Acer Predator X34 is a 4msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

25% lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has a maximum height adjustment of 120mmmm, however the Acer B346CK is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (30mm higher) and the Acer Predator X34 is a 130mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (10mm higher).
Fewer sellers
The LG 34UM68-P is only stocked by 5 sellers, but the Acer Predator X34 is stocked by 13 shops. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.

Awards

No awards found 8 Awards
allround-pc.com: Recommended Product
hardwareluxx.de: Excellent Hardware
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
hothardware.com: Editor's Choice
legitreviews.com: Recommended
overclockersclub.com: Gold
SweClockers.com: Good Product
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

11 months Ago 19 months Ago 11 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 65.71
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.10
Total running cost $ 67.81
Purchase price $ 629.00
Total cost of ownership $ 696.81
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.44T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.44 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
11
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data No data

Display

Screen Size
34" 34" 34"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 3440 x 1440
BEST
 3440 x 1440
BEST
 3440 x 1440
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 61
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Viewable Height
333mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
796mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.315 x 0.315
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
86.4cm 86cm
BEST
86.36cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
320 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
6ms 4ms
BEST
5ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
109.7 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 7W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mean Time Between Failures
30,000h Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
130mm 120mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 -5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 14

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
53.6W 0.4W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Standby Power Consumption
0.45W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
88kWh 93kWh 58kWh
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
88W Unknown - Click to provide data 53W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
AC Input Voltage
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature Range
20 - 65 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
14.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data 11kg
BEST
Packaging Height
678mm Unknown - Click to provide data 522mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
247mm Unknown - Click to provide data 201mm
BEST
Packaging Width
943mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 978mm
Weight With Stand
10.8kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 8kg
Height With Stand
589mm Unknown - Click to provide data 548.9mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
267mm Unknown - Click to provide data 252.4mm
BEST
Width With Stand
827mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 829.9mm
Weight
10.8kg
BEST
15kg 6kg
Height
589mm 455mm 379.8mm
Depth
243mm 308mm 49.2mm
Width
827mm 825mm 829.9mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 HDMI
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 HDMI
 DisplayPort
 USB
 HDMI
 DisplayPort

Technical Details

Number of Colours
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77
Brightness
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 300
Resolution
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 60
Contrast Ratio
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Power Supply Type
Internes Netsteil Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 793.77 x 340.19
Feedback