HP EliteDisplay E232 vs HP ProDisplay P240va

HP EliteDisplay E232
HP ProDisplay P240va

Top Prices

eBay
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 has a response time of 7msms, but the HP ProDisplay P240va is an 8msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

6% shorter Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 336.9mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 18.6mm shorter than the HP ProDisplay P240va (355.5mmmm).
11% shallower Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 has a depth of 49.6mmmm, however the HP ProDisplay P240va is a 55mmmm deep PC monitor (5.4mm deeper).
Narrower Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 549.3mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 21.9mm narrower than the HP ProDisplay P240va (571.2mmmm).
Cheaper by $26
The HP EliteDisplay E232 costs $26.29 less than the HP ProDisplay P240va.
2 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
5 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va is a 23.8"" PC monitor. That's 0.8" bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E232 (23.8""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A bit bigger viewable height Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va has a viewable height of 297.8mmmm, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E232 is only a 286.42mmmm viewable height PC monitor (11.38mm smaller).
Bigger viewable width Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va is a 528.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 19.22mm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E232 (528.4mmmm).
4% bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va is a 60.45cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 2.05cm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E232 (60.45cmcm).
10% lower maximum power consumption Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va is a 32WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 3W lower than the HP EliteDisplay E232 (32WW).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
4% smaller screen size Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 23"" PC monitor. That's 0.8" smaller than the HP ProDisplay P240va (23.8""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

11.38mm smaller viewable height Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 has a viewable height of 286.42mmmm, however the HP ProDisplay P240va is a 297.8mmmm viewable height PC monitor (11.38mm bigger).
4% smaller viewable width Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 509.18mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 19.22mm smaller than the HP ProDisplay P240va (528.4mmmm).
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 58.4cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 2.05cm smaller than the HP ProDisplay P240va (60.45cmcm).
Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 35WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 3W higher than the HP ProDisplay P240va (32WW).
Older by eight months
The HP EliteDisplay E232 is eight months older than the HP ProDisplay P240va.
6 Reasons Against
13% slower response time Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va has a response time of 8msms, however the HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 7msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Taller Edit
HP ProDisplay P240va is 355.5mmmm tall. That's 18.6mm taller than the HP EliteDisplay E232 (355.5mmmm).
5.4mm deeper Edit
The HP ProDisplay P240va is a 55mmmm deep PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E232 is a 49.6mmmm deep PC monitor (5.4mm shallower).
4% wider Edit
HP ProDisplay P240va is 571.2mmmm wide. That's 21.9mm wider than the HP EliteDisplay E232 (571.2mmmm).
More expensive by $26
The HP ProDisplay P240va is $26.29 more expensive than the HP EliteDisplay E232.
Fewer sellers
The HP ProDisplay P240va is only stocked by 7 shops, but the HP EliteDisplay E232 is stocked by 9 stores. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

16 months Ago 9 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
23" 23.8"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 5000000:1
 5000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1600 x 600
 720 x 400
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1600 x 600
 720 x 400
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Height
286.42mm 297.8mm
BEST
Viewable Width
509.18mm 528.4mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 60 50 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 80 24 - 94
Pixel Pitch
0.265 x 0.265 0.274 x 0.274
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
58.4cm 60.45cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
7ms
BEST
8ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
3 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
3 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Height Adjustment
150mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 -5 - 22
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When Off
0.23W
BEST
0.2W
Typical Power Consumption
28W 25W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
28kWh 28kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
35W 32W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
5.7kg 4.3kg
BEST
Height With Stand
549.9mm 416.4mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
189mm
BEST
191.2mm
Width With Stand
549.3mm
BEST
571.2mm
Weight
3.6kg 3.6kg
Height
336.9mm
BEST
355.5mm
Depth
49.6mm
BEST
55mm
Width
549.3mm
BEST
571.2mm
Feedback