Benq GL2760 vs Benq RL2755 vs Benq Zowie RL2755

(205)
(123)
Benq GL2760
Benq RL2755
Benq Zowie RL2755

Top Prices

No prices found
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
BenQ America
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
Moderately lighter Edit
The Benq GL2760 has a weight of 5.4kgg, but the Benq RL2755 and the Benq Zowie RL2755 are both 5.5kgg weight PC monitors (0.1g heavier).
Cheaper by $107
The Benq GL2760 costs $118.99, whereas the Benq RL2755 is $225.99 and the Benq Zowie RL2755 is $279.00.
4 Reasons For
Vastly faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a response time of 1msms (as does the Benq Zowie RL2755), however the Benq GL2760 is a 2msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a two HDMI port PC monitor (as does the Benq Zowie RL2755), whereas the Benq GL2760 only has one HDMI port.
Considerably better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Benq RL2755 is 75% based on 16 reviews, whereas the average rating of the Benq GL2760 is 60% (based on 1 review).
Marginally better user reviews
The average user review score of the Benq RL2755 is 94% based on 107 reviews, whereas the average rating of the Benq GL2760 is 90% (based on 204 reviews).
3 Reasons For
Vastly faster response time Edit
The Benq Zowie RL2755 has a response time of 1msms (as does the Benq RL2755), however the Benq GL2760 is a 2msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Benq Zowie RL2755 is a two HDMI port PC monitor (as does the Benq RL2755), whereas the Benq GL2760 only has one HDMI port.
1 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
A lot slower response time Edit
The Benq GL2760 has a response time of 2msms, whereas the Benq RL2755 and the Benq Zowie RL2755 are both 1msms response time PC monitors (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Benq GL2760 is one, but the Benq Zowie RL2755 only has two HDMI ports.
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by over two years
The Benq GL2760 is nine months older than the Benq RL2755 and two years older than the Benq Zowie RL2755.
Expert review Rating is considerably Worse
The Benq GL2760 only has an average expert score of 60%, but the Benq RL2755 has an average expert rating of 75% (based on 16 reviews).
User review Rating is a little Worse
The Benq GL2760 has an average user score of 90%, but the Benq RL2755 has an average user rating of 94% (based on 107 reviews).
4 Reasons Against
A little heavier Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a weight of 5.5kgg (as does the Benq Zowie RL2755), whereas the Benq GL2760 is a 5.4kgg weight PC monitor (0.1g lighter).
More expensive by $107
The Benq RL2755 is $107 more expensive than the Benq GL2760.
Fewer sellers
The Benq RL2755 is only stocked by 4 stores, but the Benq Zowie RL2755 is stocked by 5 shops. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by over one year
The Benq RL2755 is 17 months older than the Benq Zowie RL2755.
2 Reasons Against
A bit heavier Edit
The Benq Zowie RL2755 has a weight of 5.5kgg (as does the Benq RL2755), whereas the Benq GL2760 is a 5.4kgg weight PC monitor (0.1g lighter).
More expensive by $160
The Benq Zowie RL2755 is $160.01 more expensive than the Benq GL2760 and $53.01 more expensive than the Benq RL2755.

Awards

No awards found 2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

33 months Ago 24 months Ago 6 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 28.20
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 30.53
Purchase price $ 279.00
Total cost of ownership $ 309.53
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data
0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 12000000:1
 12000000:1
 12000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
 Gloss
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 336.15mm 336.15mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.6mm 597.6mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 160° 160°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 170° 170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.58cm Unknown - Click to provide data 68.58cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
2ms 1ms
BEST
1ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1 1
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
2
BEST
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
DVI Port
1 1 1

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 4W 4W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 15 -5 - 20
OSD Language
17 17 17

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
29W 24.21W 23W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 90
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 40

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
7.3kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
641mm Unknown - Click to provide data 479mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
215mm Unknown - Click to provide data 214mm
BEST
Width With Stand
488mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 640mm
Weight
5.4kg
BEST
5.5kg 5.5kg
Height
715mm 478mm 378mm
Depth
132mm 213mm 59mm
Width
488mm 639mm 640mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
Feedback