Philips 220B4 vs Philips BDM4350UC

Philips 220B4
Philips BDM4350UC

Top Prices

MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
Overstock
Delivery unknown
No prices found

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
Lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Philips 220B4 has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 11.7WW, but the Philips BDM4350UC is a 46.5W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (34.8W higher).
Two thousand, seven hundred and sixty-four times lighter Edit
The Philips 220B4 has a weight of 3.4kgg, whereas the Philips BDM4350UC is a 9.4kg weight PC monitor (9.4kg heavier).
62% shorter Edit
Philips 220B4 is 349mmmm tall. That's 213mm shorter than the Philips BDM4350UC (562mm).
A lot shallower Edit
The Philips 220B4 is a 59mmmm deep PC monitor, whereas the Philips BDM4350UC is an 82mm deep PC monitor (23mm deeper).
Narrower Edit
Philips 220B4 is 504mmmm wide. That's 464mm narrower than the Philips BDM4350UC (968mm).
Hugely lower power consumption in economy mode Edit
The Philips 220B4 has a power consumption in economy mode of 11.7WW, but the Philips BDM4350UC is a 46.5W power consumption in economy mode PC monitor (34.8W higher).
3x lower power consumption when active Edit
The Philips 220B4 has a power consumption when active of 15.8WW, however the Philips BDM4350UC is a 63.1W power consumption when active PC monitor (47.3W higher).
Cheaper to run by $58.38
Over five years the Philips 220B4 is $58.38 cheaper to run than the Philips BDM4350UC. Read more
8 Reasons For
21" bigger screen size Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC has a screen size of 43", whereas the Philips 220B4 is only a 22"" PC monitor (21" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

394mm larger viewable size diagonal Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC has a viewable size diagonal of 953mm, but the Philips 220B4 is only a 559mmmm viewable size diagonal PC monitor (394mm smaller).
Bigger viewable height Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC is a 543mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 246.9mm bigger than the Philips 220B4 (543mm).
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Philips 220B4 (178°).
8° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°, whereas the Philips 220B4 is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC has a display brightness of 300 cd/m², whereas the Philips 220B4 is only a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
One more DisplayPort Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC is a two DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the Philips 220B4 only has one DisplayPort.
69,970h longer mean time between failures Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC is a 70,000h mean time between failures PC monitor. That's 69,970h longer than the Philips 220B4 (70,000h). Read more

THE Mean time before failure (mtbf) indicates the expected smooth lifetime of the product in terms of its actual use. This is arrived at through extensive testing of the product. After 30,000 hours it may work for another 30,000 but there are no guarantees.

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
96% smaller screen size Edit
The Philips 220B4 is a 22"" PC monitor. That's 21" smaller than the Philips BDM4350UC (43"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

71% smaller viewable size diagonal Edit
The Philips 220B4 is a 559mmmm viewable size diagonal PC monitor. That's 394mm smaller than the Philips BDM4350UC (953mm).
246.9mm smaller viewable height Edit
The Philips 220B4 has a viewable height of 296.1mmmm, whereas the Philips BDM4350UC is a 543mm viewable height PC monitor (246.9mm bigger).
18° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Philips 220B4 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°°, whereas the Philips BDM4350UC is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
5% narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Philips 220B4 is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Philips BDM4350UC (178°).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Philips 220B4 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Philips BDM4350UC (300 cd/m²).
Only one DisplayPort Edit
The Philips 220B4 is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the Philips BDM4350UC only has two DisplayPorts.
2333x shorter mean time between failures Edit
The Philips 220B4 has a mean time between failures of 30,000hh, whereas the Philips BDM4350UC is a 70,000h mean time between failures PC monitor (69,970h longer). Read more

THE Mean time before failure (mtbf) indicates the expected smooth lifetime of the product in terms of its actual use. This is arrived at through extensive testing of the product. After 30,000 hours it may work for another 30,000 but there are no guarantees.

Older by over three years
The Philips 220B4 is four years older than the Philips BDM4350UC.
9 Reasons Against
75% higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC is a 46.5W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 34.8W higher than the Philips 220B4 (46.5W).
9.4kg heavier Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC is a 9.4kg weight PC monitor. That's 9.4kg heavier than the Philips 220B4 (9.4kg).
213mm taller Edit
Philips BDM4350UC is 562mm tall, but the Philips 220B4 is a 349mmmm tall PC monitor (213mm shorter).
29% deeper Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC is an 82mm deep PC monitor. That's 23mm deeper than the Philips 220B4 (82mm).
A lot wider Edit
Philips BDM4350UC is 968mm wide, but the Philips 220B4 is a 504mmmm wide PC monitor (464mm narrower).
Higher power consumption in economy mode Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC is a 46.5W power consumption in economy mode PC monitor. That's 34.8W higher than the Philips 220B4 (46.5W).
75% higher power consumption when active Edit
The Philips BDM4350UC is a 63.1W power consumption when active PC monitor. That's 47.3W higher than the Philips 220B4 (63.1W).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
More expensive to run over five years by 276%
Over five years the running costs of the Philips BDM4350UC are $79.55 which is $58.38 more than the Philips 220B4. Show assumptions.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

52 months Ago 9 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 19.77
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.40
Total running cost $ 21.17
Purchase price $ 172.08
Total cost of ownership $ 193.25
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 77.22
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 79.55

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.14T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.14 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.52T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.52 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
22" 43"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1680 x 1050
BEST
 1680 x 1050
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 50000000:1
 50000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 3840 x 2160
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
Digital Vertical Frequency
56 - 75 23 - 80
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 30 - 160
Viewable Size Diagonal
559mm 953mm
BEST
Viewable Height
296.1mm 543mm
BEST
Viewable Width
473.76mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
Vertical Scan Range
56 - 75 56 - 80
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 30 - 99
Pixel Pitch
0.282 x 0.282 0.2451 x 0.2451
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1200:1
 1200:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
55.9cm
BEST
108cm
Display Technology
 LCD
 LCD
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms 5ms
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:9
BEST
 16:10
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1
DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
USB 2.0 Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
3W
BEST
14W
Loudspeaker
2 2

Design

Recyclable Material Percentage
100% 100%
BEST
Coloured Feet
 Black
 Silver
 Black
 Silver
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
Mean Time Between Failures
30,000h 70,000h
BEST

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Height Adjustment
110mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
-65 - 65 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (SIMPL)
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 POR
 ESP
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 FIN
 JPN
 POL
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
 CHI (SIMPL)
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 POR
 ESP
 DUT
 GRE
 CZE
 UKR
 FIN
 JPN
 POL
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
OSD Language
8 21
BEST

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
11.7W
BEST
46.5W
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
16.13W
BEST
63.1W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Average Power Consumption
16.8W Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption
16.8W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Range
20 - 80 20 - 80
Operating Altitude
0 - 3658 0 - 3658
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 3658 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Safety Certification
 RoHS
 WEEE
 RoHS
 WEEE
Compliance Industry Standard
 TCO
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 21.38lbs
Package Weight
7.1kg 14.3kg
BEST
Packaging Height
391mm
BEST
680mm
Packaging Depth
186mm 160mm
BEST
Packaging Width
565mm 1,070mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
5.2kg
BEST
9.7kg
Height With Stand
509mm
BEST
630mm
Depth With Stand
227mm
BEST
259mm
Width With Stand
504mm
BEST
968mm
Weight
3.4kg
BEST
9.4kg
Height
349mm
BEST
562mm
Depth
59mm
BEST
82mm
Width
504mm
BEST
968mm

Other Features

Package Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 42.1 x 26.8 x 6.3
Power Consumption in Economy Mode
11.7W
BEST
46.5W
User Controls
Unknown - Click to provide data Multiview, User, Menu, SmartControl
Power Consumption When Active
15.8W
BEST
63.1W
Picture Enhancement
 SmartImage
 SmartImage
Effective Viewing Area
 473.76 x 296.1
BEST
 473.76 x 296.1
Weight
5.64kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Viewable Area
 473.76 x 296.1
BEST
 473.76 x 296.1
Package Dimensions
565 x 391 x 186 1070 x 680 x 160
Dimensions With Stand
504 x 509 x 227 Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Weight
7.05kg Unknown - Click to provide data
MultiView
Unknown - Click to provide data Yes

Technical Details

Brightness Uniformity
Unknown - Click to provide data 96~105%
Delta E
Unknown - Click to provide data <3
USB 2.0 Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
Feedback