Asus VG248QE vs Benq RL2455 vs DELL P2317H

(357)
(304)
Asus VG248QE
Benq RL2455
DELL P2317H

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
Newegg UK
eBay
Standard delivery: $4.77
In stock (13 available)
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
B&H Photo
In stock
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
5% bigger screen size Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 24"" PC monitor, and so does the Benq RL2455. That's 1" bigger than the DELL P2317H (23""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

29% brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 100 cd/m² brighter than the Benq RL2455 and the DELL P2317H (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
5ms faster response time Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a response time of 1msms (as does the Benq RL2455), whereas the DELL P2317H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (5ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

28% shorter Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a height of 340.4mmmm. That's 94.6mm shorter than the Benq RL2455 (357mmmm) and 16.6mm shorter than the DELL P2317H (357mmmm).
Twelve more awards
The Asus VG248QE has 13 awards from expert review sites, however the Benq RL2455 has 1 award.
Better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Asus VG248QE is 78% based on 38 reviews, but the average rating of the Benq RL2455 is 70% (based on 9 reviews).
A bit better user reviews
The average user review score of the Asus VG248QE is 94% based on 319 reviews, but the average rating of the Benq RL2455 is 92% (based on 295 reviews).
4 Reasons For
5% bigger screen size Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 24"" PC monitor, and so does the Asus VG248QE. That's 1" bigger than the DELL P2317H (23""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 2.56cm bigger than the DELL P2317H (58.4cmcm).
Five times faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a response time of 1msms (as does the Asus VG248QE), whereas the DELL P2317H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (5ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Benq RL2455 is two, but the DELL P2317H only has one HDMI port.
7 Reasons For
Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL P2317H has a vertical viewing angle of 178°°, but the Asus VG248QE and the Benq RL2455 are both only 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitors (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL P2317H is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the Asus VG248QE and the Benq RL2455 (178°°).
Larger color gamut Edit
The DELL P2317H has a color gamut of 82%%, but the Benq RL2455 is only a 72%% color gamut PC monitor (10% smaller).
2.4g lighter Edit
The DELL P2317H has a weight of 3.1kgg, but the Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (2.4g heavier) and the Benq RL2455 is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor (1g heavier).
9% narrower Edit
The DELL P2317H has a width of 531.8mmmm. That's 37.6mm narrower than the Asus VG248QE (531.8mmmm) and 47.2mm narrower than the Benq RL2455 (531.8mmmm).
Cheaper by $27
The DELL P2317H costs $119.95, whereas the Asus VG248QE is $206.99 and the Benq RL2455 is $146.99.
3 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a vertical viewing angle of 160°° (as does the Benq RL2455), but the DELL P2317H is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
5% narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the Benq RL2455. That's 8° narrower than the DELL P2317H (178°°).
One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Asus VG248QE is one (as does the DELL P2317H), but the Benq RL2455 only has two HDMI ports.
A lot heavier Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a weight of 5.5kgg, but the Benq RL2455 is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g lighter) and the DELL P2317H is a 3.1kgg weight PC monitor (2.4g lighter).
Deeper Edit
Asus VG248QE is 57.3mmmm deep, but the Benq RL2455 is a 189mmmm deep PC monitor (131.7mm deeper) and the DELL P2317H is a 50.3mmmm deep PC monitor (7mm shallower).
Wider Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a width of 569.4mmmm. That's 9.6mm narrower than the Benq RL2455 (531.8mmmm) and 37.6mm wider than the DELL P2317H (531.8mmmm).
More expensive by $87
The Asus VG248QE is $60 more expensive than the Benq RL2455 and $87.04 more expensive than the DELL P2317H.
Not as many stockists
The Asus VG248QE is only stocked by 11 retailers, however the DELL P2317H is stocked by 14 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by over three years
The Asus VG248QE is eight months older than the Benq RL2455 and three years older than the DELL P2317H.
13 Reasons Against
Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°° (as does the Asus VG248QE), but the DELL P2317H is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
5% narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the Asus VG248QE. That's 8° narrower than the DELL P2317H (178°°).
40% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL P2317H. That's 100 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VG248QE (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Smaller color gamut Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a color gamut of 72%%, but the DELL P2317H is an 82%% color gamut PC monitor (10% larger).
Heavier Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a weight of 4.1kgg, but the Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g heavier) and the DELL P2317H is a 3.1kgg weight PC monitor (1g lighter).
22% taller Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a height of 435mmmm. That's 94.6mm taller than the Asus VG248QE (357mmmm) and 78mm taller than the DELL P2317H (357mmmm).
Wider Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a width of 579mmmm. That's 9.6mm wider than the Asus VG248QE (531.8mmmm) and 47.2mm wider than the DELL P2317H (531.8mmmm).
More expensive by $27
The Benq RL2455 is $27.04 more expensive than the DELL P2317H.
Not as many stockists
The Benq RL2455 is only stocked by 11 sellers, however the DELL P2317H is stocked by 14 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by over two years
The Benq RL2455 is three years older than the DELL P2317H.
Twelve less awards
The Benq RL2455 has only received 1 award, however the Asus VG248QE has received 13 awards.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The Benq RL2455 only has an average expert score of 70%, but the Asus VG248QE has an average expert rating of 78% (based on 38 reviews).
User review Rating is marginally Worse
The Benq RL2455 has an average user score of 92%, but the Asus VG248QE has an average user rating of 94% (based on 319 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The DELL P2317H is a 23"" PC monitor. That's 1" smaller than the Asus VG248QE and the Benq RL2455 (23""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

5% smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL P2317H is a 58.4cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 2.56cm smaller than the Benq RL2455 (58.4cmcm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL P2317H is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the Benq RL2455. That's 100 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VG248QE (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
5ms slower response time Edit
The DELL P2317H has a response time of 6msms, whereas the Asus VG248QE and the Benq RL2455 are both 1msms response time PC monitors (5ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL P2317H is one (as does the Asus VG248QE), but the Benq RL2455 only has two HDMI ports.
Taller Edit
The DELL P2317H has a height of 357mmmm. That's 16.6mm taller than the Asus VG248QE (357mmmm) and 78mm shorter than the Benq RL2455 (357mmmm).

Awards

13 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
hardware.info: Silver Award
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
moddingmx.com: Gold
ozeros.com: Recommended
profesionalreview.com: Gold
Techsweden.org: Value for Money
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
1 Award
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

49 months Ago 40 months Ago 7 months Ago

Display

Screen Size
24"
BEST
24"
BEST
23"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
 W-LED
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 144 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 140 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.2768 x 0.2768 0.276 x 0.276 0.265 x 0.265
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 60.96cm
BEST
58.4cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
1ms
BEST
6ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72% 82%
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 96

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
1
DVI-D Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
DVI Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Upstream Port Type
 USB Type-B
 USB Type-B
 USB Type-B

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
4W 4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Tilt Angle
15 - 5 -5 - 15 -5 - 21
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 45 - 45
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 17 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
45W 27W 18W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 50.8kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 38W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12191
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.1kg 5.7kg
BEST
7.3kg
Packaging Height
413mm
BEST
420mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
221mm 134mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
674mm 650mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.1kg
BEST
5.6kg
Height With Stand
499.9mm 435mm
BEST
486.9mm
Depth With Stand
231mm 189mm 180mm
BEST
Width With Stand
569.4mm 579mm 531.8mm
BEST
Weight
5.5kg 4.1kg 3.1kg
BEST
Height
340.4mm
BEST
435mm 357mm
Depth
57.3mm 189mm
BEST
50.3mm
Width
569.4mm 579mm 531.8mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 DisplayPort
BEST
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 DisplayPort
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 DisplayPort
BEST

Other Features

Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback