Asus PA249 vs Asus PB248 vs DELL U2413

(75)
(12)
(57)
Asus PA249
Asus PB248

Top Prices

Overstock
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
Amazon US
Delivery unknown
No prices found
Amazon US
Out of stock
PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock (150 available)
BuyVPC
Delivery unknown
In stock (16 available)

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus PA249 is a 61.13cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.17cm bigger than the DELL U2413 (60.96cmcm).
15% brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus PA249 is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2413. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Asus PB248 (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
One more USB 3.0 port Edit
The Asus PA249 is a five USB 3.0 port PC monitor (as does the DELL U2413), whereas the Asus PB248 only has four USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Five USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports Edit
The Asus PA249 has five USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports, however the Asus PB248 only has four USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports and the DELL U2413 only has four USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports.
One more USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The Asus PA249 is a five USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor (as does the DELL U2413), whereas the Asus PB248 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
Four more awards
The Asus PA249 has 5 awards from expert review sites, whereas the Asus PB248 has 1 award and the DELL U2413 has 4 awards.
4 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Asus PB248 is a 24.1" PC monitor. That's 0" smaller than the Asus PA249 (24"") and 0.1" bigger than the DELL U2413 (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

15.77M more display colour count Edit
Asus PB248 is 16.77M display colours, but the Asus PA249 and the DELL U2413 are both only 1,073.7MM display colours PC monitors (15.77M less).
Cheaper to run by $6.40
Over five years the Asus PB248 only costs $81.87 to run however the Asus PA249 costs $88.27 to run (8% more). Read more
Marginally better user reviews
Based on 9 user reviews, the average review score of the Asus PB248 is 100%, whereas the average rating of the Asus PA249 is 88% (based on 56 reviews) and the average rating of the DELL U2413 is 96% (based on 49 reviews).
8 Reasons For
Brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL U2413 has a display brightness of 350 cd/m² cd/m² (as does the Asus PA249), but the Asus PB248 is only a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Five USB 3.0 ports Edit
The DELL U2413 has five USB 3.0 ports, and so does the Asus PA249, however the Asus PB248 only has four USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Five USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The DELL U2413 has five USB Type-A downstream ports, and so does the Asus PA249, however the Asus PB248 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
Vastly lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The DELL U2413 is a 0.5WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 0.5W lower than the Asus PA249 (0.5WW).
Lighter Edit
The DELL U2413 is a 5kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.6g lighter than the Asus PA249 (5kgg) and 6.6kg lighter than the Asus PB248 (5kgg).
$57 cheaper
The DELL U2413 costs $442.20, whereas the Asus PA249 is $499.00.
Available from 5 shops
The more retailers stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Expert reviews are appreciably better
Based on 8 expert reviews, the DELL U2413 has an average review score of 93%, but the Asus PA249 has an average rating of 78% (based on 19 reviews).

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
Sixteen times less display colour count Edit
The Asus PA249 is a 1,073.7MM display colours PC monitor (as does the DELL U2413), whereas the Asus PB248 is a 16.77M display colours PC monitor (15.77M more).
A lot higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Asus PA249 has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 1WW, whereas the DELL U2413 is a 0.5WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.5W lower).
25% heavier Edit
The Asus PA249 has a weight of 6.6kgg, however the Asus PB248 is a 6.6kg weight PC monitor (6.6kg heavier) and the DELL U2413 is a 5kgg weight PC monitor (1.6g lighter).
More expensive by $57
The Asus PA249 is $56.80 more expensive than the DELL U2413.
Less retailers
The Asus PA249 is only stocked by 3 retailers, whereas the DELL U2413 is stocked by 8 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Higher running costs over five years by $6.40
The Asus PA249 costs $88.27 to run which is $6.40 more to run than the Asus PB248 over five years. Show assumptions.
Expert review Rating is considerably Worse
The Asus PA249's average expert score is only 78%, however the DELL U2413's is 93% (based on 8 reviews).
User review Rating is considerably Worse
The Asus PA249's average user score is 88%, however the Asus PB248's is 100% (based on 9 reviews) and the DELL U2413's is 96% (based on 49 reviews).
8 Reasons Against
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus PB248 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus PA249 and the DELL U2413 (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
One less USB 3.0 port Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the Asus PB248 is four, but the DELL U2413 only has five USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Only four USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports Edit
The Asus PB248 is a four USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A port PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2413, whereas the Asus PA249 only has five USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports.
One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Asus PB248 is four, but the DELL U2413 only has five USB Type-A downstream ports.
6.6kg heavier Edit
The Asus PB248 has a weight of 6.6kg, whereas the Asus PA249 is a 6.6kgg weight PC monitor (6.6kg lighter) and the DELL U2413 is a 5kgg weight PC monitor (6.6kg lighter).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by three months
The Asus PB248 is three months older than the Asus PA249 and two months older than the DELL U2413.
Four less awards
The Asus PB248 has only received 1 award, but the Asus PA249 has received 5 awards and the DELL U2413 has received 4 awards.
7 Reasons Against
Moderately smaller screen size Edit
The DELL U2413 has a screen size of 24"", but the Asus PA249 is a 24.1"" PC monitor (0.1" bigger) and the Asus PB248 is a 24.1" PC monitor (0.1" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Sixteen times less display colour count Edit
The DELL U2413 has a display colour count of 1,073.7MM, and so does the Asus PA249. That's 15.77M less than the Asus PB248 (1,073.7MM).
0.17cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2413 has a display diagonal of 60.96cmcm, but the Asus PA249 is a 61.13cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.17cm bigger).
One less USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A port Edit
The number of USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports on the DELL U2413 is four (as does the Asus PB248), but the Asus PA249 only has five USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports.
One month older
The DELL U2413 is older than the Asus PA249 by one month.
Fewer awards
Whilst the DELL U2413 has received 4 awards, the Asus PA249 has received 5 awards.
Moderately Lower user review Score
The DELL U2413 has an average user rating of 96%, but the Asus PB248 has an average user rating of 100% (based on 9 reviews).

Awards

5 Awards
eteknix.com: Editor's Choice
ixbt.com: Excellent Package
overclock3d.net: Gold Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
xfastest.com: Editor's Choice
1 Award
cnews.cz: Smart Buy
4 Awards
Digital Versus: 5 Star
focus-numerique.fr: Recommended
Les Numeriques.com: 5 Star
vido.com.ua: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

44 months Ago 47 months Ago 46 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 88.27
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 88.27
Purchase price $ 499.00
Total cost of ownership $ 587.27
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 79.54
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 81.87
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.57T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.57 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
15
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.53T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.53 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
14
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
24.1" 24.1"
BEST
24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
BEST
 LED
 LED
BEST
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 609.6mm
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 324mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
Pixel Pitch
0.270 x 0.270 Unknown - Click to provide data 0.27 x 0.27
Display Colour Count
1,073.7M 16.77M
BEST
1,073.7M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
61.13cm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 60.96cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms 6ms
BEST
6ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 120%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
DisplayPort
1 1 1
USB 3.0 Port
5
BEST
4 5
BEST
HDMI Port
1 1 1
DVI-D Port
1 1 1
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
DVI Port
1 1 1
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
5
BEST
4 4
USB Type-A Downstream Port
5
BEST
4 5
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Silver
 Black/Silver
 Black
 Silver
 Black/Silver
 Black
 Silver
 Black/Silver
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
1W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
72W 65W 60W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
BEST
0.5W
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 130W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12.192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
10.4kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 9kg
Packaging Height
439mm 439mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
292mm 292mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
681mm 681mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5kg
Height With Stand
416.3mm 416.3mm 415.9mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
235mm 235mm 200.5mm
BEST
Width With Stand
557.2mm 557.2mm 556mm
BEST
Weight
6.6kg 6.6kg 5kg
BEST
Height
362mm 362.8mm 415.9mm
Depth
62mm 62mm 200.5mm
Width
557.2mm 557.2mm 556mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST

Other Features

Maximum Resolution
 1920 x 1200
BEST
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
Placement
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback