AOC E1659 vs Asus MB169B+ vs HP EliteDisplay S140u vs HP U160

(53)
(32)
AOC E1659
Asus MB169B+
HP EliteDisplay S140u
HP U160

Top Prices

Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
In stock (326 available)
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
Best Buy
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 3 left!
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
btecomputer
Delivery unknown
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
Techno Outlet Site
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Bigger viewable height Edit
The AOC E1659 has a viewable height of 193.5mmmm (as does the HP U160), but the HP EliteDisplay S140u is only a 174.1mmmm viewable height PC monitor (19.4mm smaller).
11% bigger viewable width Edit
The AOC E1659 is a 344.2mmmm viewable width PC monitor, and so does the HP U160. That's 34.6mm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay S140u (344.2mmmm).
Hugely lighter Edit
The AOC E1659 has a weight of 1.1kgg, but the Asus MB169B+ is an 800g weight PC monitor (798.9g heavier), the HP EliteDisplay S140u is a 1.3kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g heavier) and the HP U160 is a 1.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.4g heavier).
A bit better user reviews
The average user review score of the AOC E1659 is 87% based on 33 reviews, but the average rating of the Asus MB169B+ is 86% (based on 32 reviews).
4 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Asus MB169B+ is a 15.6" PC monitor. That's 0" smaller than the AOC E1659 and the HP U160 (15.6"") and 1.6" bigger than the HP EliteDisplay S140u (15.6""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

10% brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus MB169B+ is a 200 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 0 cd/m² dimmer than the AOC E1659 and the HP EliteDisplay S140u (180 cd/m² cd/m²) and 20 cd/m² brighter than the HP U160 (180 cd/m² cd/m²).
11 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
$8.35 cheaper to run
Over five years the Asus MB169B+ is $8.35 cheaper to run than the AOC E1659 and $1.11 cheaper to run than the HP EliteDisplay S140u. Read more
No data 6 Reasons For
19.4mm bigger viewable height Edit
The HP U160 is a 193.5mmmm viewable height PC monitor, and so does the AOC E1659. That's 19.4mm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay S140u (193.5mmmm).
Bigger viewable width Edit
The HP U160 has a viewable width of 344.2mmmm (as does the AOC E1659), but the HP EliteDisplay S140u is only a 309.6mmmm viewable width PC monitor (34.6mm smaller).
15° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The HP U160 is a 65°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 15° wider than the AOC E1659 and the HP EliteDisplay S140u (65°°) and 95° narrower than the Asus MB169B+ (65°°).
4.04cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP U160 has a display diagonal of 39.6cmcm, whereas the Asus MB169B+ is only a 39.6cm display diagonal PC monitor (0cm bigger) and the HP EliteDisplay S140u is only a 35.56cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (4.04cm smaller).
17% faster response time Edit
The HP U160 is a 12msms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the AOC E1659 and the HP EliteDisplay S140u (12msms) and 2ms faster than the Asus MB169B+ (12msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$45 cheaper
The HP U160 is $45 cheaper than the AOC E1659, $125.99 cheaper than the Asus MB169B+ and $94.98 cheaper than the HP EliteDisplay S140u.

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
3x narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The AOC E1659 has a vertical viewing angle of 50°° (as does the HP EliteDisplay S140u), but the Asus MB169B+ is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (110° wider) and the HP U160 is a 65°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (15° wider).
More expensive by $45
The AOC E1659 is $45 more expensive than the HP U160.
Not as many stockists
The AOC E1659 is only stocked by 10 sellers, however the Asus MB169B+ is stocked by 12 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by over two years
The AOC E1659 is 23 months older than the Asus MB169B+ and two years older than the HP EliteDisplay S140u. The AOC E1659 is the same age as the HP U160.
Higher running costs over five years by $8.35
The running costs over five years of the AOC E1659 are $14.47 which is $8.35 more than the Asus MB169B+ and $7.24 more than the HP EliteDisplay S140u. Show assumptions.
5 Reasons Against
A lot slower response time Edit
The Asus MB169B+ has a response time of 14ms, whereas the AOC E1659 and the HP EliteDisplay S140u are both 8msms response time PC monitors (6ms faster) and the HP U160 is a 12msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Heavier Edit
The Asus MB169B+ has a weight of 800g, but the AOC E1659 is a 1.1kgg weight PC monitor (798.9g lighter), the HP EliteDisplay S140u is a 1.3kgg weight PC monitor (798.7g lighter) and the HP U160 is a 1.5kgg weight PC monitor (798.5g lighter).
More expensive by $126
The Asus MB169B+ is $80.99 more expensive than the AOC E1659, $31.01 more expensive than the HP EliteDisplay S140u and $125.99 more expensive than the HP U160.
Older by four months
The Asus MB169B+ is four months older than the HP EliteDisplay S140u.
User review Rating is a little Worse
The Asus MB169B+ has an average user score of 86%, but the AOC E1659 has an average user rating of 87% (based on 33 reviews).
9 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140u is a 14"" PC monitor. That's 1.6" smaller than the AOC E1659 and the HP U160 (15.6"") and 1.6" smaller than the Asus MB169B+ (15.6""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable height Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140u has a viewable height of 174.1mmmm, but the AOC E1659 and the HP U160 are both 193.5mmmm viewable height PC monitors (19.4mm bigger).
12% smaller viewable width Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140u is a 309.6mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 34.6mm smaller than the AOC E1659 and the HP U160 (344.2mmmm).
Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140u has a vertical viewing angle of 50°° (as does the AOC E1659), but the Asus MB169B+ is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (110° wider) and the HP U160 is a 65°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (15° wider).
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140u is a 35.56cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 4.04cm smaller than the Asus MB169B+ (39.6cmcm) and 4.04cm smaller than the HP U160 (39.6cmcm).
Heavier Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140u has a weight of 1.3kgg, but the AOC E1659 is a 1.1kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g lighter), the Asus MB169B+ is an 800g weight PC monitor (798.7g heavier) and the HP U160 is a 1.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g heavier).
More expensive by $95
The HP EliteDisplay S140u is $49.98 more expensive than the AOC E1659 and $94.98 more expensive than the HP U160.
Not as many stockists
The HP EliteDisplay S140u is only stocked by 4 retailers, however the AOC E1659 is stocked by 10 retailers and the Asus MB169B+ is stocked by 12 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
$1.11 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the HP EliteDisplay S140u costs $7.23 to run which is $1.11 more to run than the Asus MB169B+. Show assumptions.
4 Reasons Against
20 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP U160 has a display brightness of 180 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the AOC E1659 and the HP EliteDisplay S140u are both 200 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (20 cd/m² brighter) and the Asus MB169B+ is a 200 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² brighter).
Heavier Edit
The HP U160 is a 1.5kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.4g heavier than the AOC E1659 (1.5kgg), 798.5g lighter than the Asus MB169B+ (1.5kgg) and 0.2g heavier than the HP EliteDisplay S140u (1.5kgg).
Fewer sellers
Only 1 seller sell the HP U160, but 10 sellers sell the AOC E1659, 12 sellers sell the Asus MB169B+ and 4 sellers sell the HP EliteDisplay S140u. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Over two years older
The HP U160 is older than the Asus MB169B+ by 23 months and older than the HP EliteDisplay S140u by two years. The HP U160 is the same age as the AOC E1659.

Awards

1 Award
winmagpro.nl: Best Value
No awards found No awards found No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

40 months Ago 17 months Ago 13 months Ago 40 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 9.81
Electricity cost - standby $ 4.66
Total running cost $ 14.47
Purchase price $ 99.00
Total cost of ownership $ 113.47
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 6.12
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 6.12
Purchase price $ 179.99
Total cost of ownership $ 186.11
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 4.90
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 7.23
Purchase price $ 148.98
Total cost of ownership $ 156.21
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.094T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.094 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
2
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.04T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.04 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
1
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.047T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.047 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
1
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
15.6" 15.6"
BEST
14" 15.6"
Display Resolution
 1366 x 768
 1920 x 1080
 1366 x 768
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1366 x 768
 1920 x 1080
 1366 x 768
 1920 x 1080
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1366 х 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 720 x 400
 1366 х 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 720 x 400
BEST
 1366 х 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 720 x 400
 1366 х 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 720 x 400
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 396.2mm
Viewable Height
193.5mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 174.1mm 193.5mm
BEST
Viewable Width
344.2mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 309.6mm 344.2mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.252 x 0.252 0.179 x 0.179 0.193 x 0.193 0.252 x 0.252
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.26M 0.26M
Vertical Viewing Angle
50° 160° 50° 65°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
90°
BEST
160° 90°
BEST
90°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 700:1
 700:1
BEST
 700:1
 700:1
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 39.6cm 35.56cm 39.6cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
200 cd/m² 200 cd/m²
BEST
200 cd/m² 180 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 14ms 8ms 12ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 262144 colours
 16.78 million colours
 262144 colours
 16.78 million colours
 262144 colours
 16.78 million colours
 262144 colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
15 - 30 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 15 - 45
On Screen Display Language
 ENG
 FRE
 ESP
 ENG
 FRE
 ESP
 ENG
 FRE
 ESP
 ENG
 FRE
 ESP
OSD Language
14 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Typical Power Consumption
8W 5W 4W
BEST
5W
Standby Power Consumption
1W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
BEST
0.5W
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 7W Unknown - Click to provide data

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 95
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 RoHS
BEST
 RoHS
 RoHS
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
1.7kg
BEST
2kg Unknown - Click to provide data 2.1kg
Packaging Height
295mm
BEST
297mm Unknown - Click to provide data 96mm
Packaging Depth
84mm 57mm Unknown - Click to provide data 380mm
BEST
Packaging Width
442mm 435mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 455mm
Weight
1.1kg
BEST
800g 1.3kg 1.5kg
Height
234mm 236mm 217.1mm 278.5mm
Depth
23mm 8.5mm 13.5mm 26mm
Width
375mm 379mm 345.8mm 377mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
BEST
 USB
BEST
 USB
 USB
BEST
Feedback